ZaZ said: I can either hire better players, save to become professional or upgrade my training facilities. I am leaning towards becoming professional first. What are your opinions? I will post the finances and squad below. Expand
I don't think that improving the training facilities would give you any significant benefits but I haven't played much in the lower leagues and I have no idea what benefits you get from becoming professional... could you enlighten me?
ZaZ said: The number of titles was just an interesting fact. I believe extra data is always useful. Expand
I agree, having extra data doesn't hurt and it might be interesting to see but the points per match is the only stat that should be looked at when you compare tactics
Mark said: An important thing worth noting is that ZaZ Blue 2.0 produced 18 champions from the 40 seasons across all leagues including one for a lowest ranked side. This is without buying any players. Very impressive. Also worth noting that Phoenix wasnt far behind and performed better with some of the lower ranked teams. Viola was a bit behind the other 2 tactics but mainly with underdog teams. Viola was still very competitive though. Expand
As @Milakus rightly said the standing is a meaningless stat and only the points per match matters
Here's a good example from real life
In the season 2018-19 Liverpool got 97 points and it wasn't enough to win the title because Man City was on fire too and got 98 pts at the end
But in season Leicester City won the league with only 81 points because other teams in the league played very poorly in that season
so as you can see the standing is a quite irrelevant stat when it comes comparing tactics, the points per match is the only what matters
babemocni1988 said: It is still beter team by the way thanks for this analise! And i was thinking that natural position of Ilicic and Gomez should do much beter then Rebic and Dias,there is no logic two world class AMC against two sub. players... Expand
Anyway, it's hard to say why one person has better result than other person because there could be many factors for that. For example, he might be better in managing the morale and conditions of the players or making substitutions or handling touchline shouts during matches or just had a great luck during the season... you know FM could be very random
I don't think that improving the training facilities would give you any significant benefits but I haven't played much in the lower leagues and I have no idea what benefits you get from becoming professional... could you enlighten me?
https://fm-arena.com/table/9-player-attributes-importance/
I agree, having extra data doesn't hurt and it might be interesting to see but the points per match is the only stat that should be looked at when you compare tactics
As @Milakus rightly said the standing is a meaningless stat and only the points per match matters
Here's a good example from real life
In the season 2018-19 Liverpool got 97 points and it wasn't enough to win the title because Man City was on fire too and got 98 pts at the end
But in season Leicester City won the league with only 81 points because other teams in the league played very poorly in that season
so as you can see the standing is a quite irrelevant stat when it comes comparing tactics, the points per match is the only what matters
Hi,
Have you tried this tactic in EPL yet?
I think people do that because it's fun!
Who said that he tested something? He just played the game as he liked and had fun. He really don't owe you anything...
Nope, I haven't had time to try it yet.
And i was thinking that natural position of Ilicic and Gomez should do much beter then Rebic and Dias,there is no logic two world class AMC against two sub. players...
Anyway, it's hard to say why one person has better result than other person because there could be many factors for that. For example, he might be better in managing the morale and conditions of the players or making substitutions or handling touchline shouts during matches or just had a great luck during the season... you know FM could be very random
Atalanta team:
Ilici - 153CA
Gomez - 157CA
Biraghi - 139CA
Malinovskyi - 147CA
Faraoni - 136CA
De Roon - 148CA
Gosens - 149CA
Palomino - 146CA
Rafael Toloi - 146CA
Hateboer - 145CA
Gollini - 145CA
Avg. CA = 146
AC Milan team:
Diaz - 136CA
Rebic - 147CA
Castillejo - 141CA
Hakan Çalhanoğlu - 149CA
Saelemaekers - 141CA
Sandro Tonali - 138CA
Theo Hernández - 153CA
Alessio Romagnoli - 149CA
Simon Kjær - 145CA
Davide Calabria - 139CA
Gianluigi Donnarumma - 156CA
Avg. CA = 144
So... Atalanta avg. CA is 146 nad AC Milan avg. CA is 144... even I with my poor mathematics skills can say that 146 is not 3 time more than 144
Who are the best IWs for this tactic?
Got 100 pts in the league.
I can say this is a very good 4-4-2 tactic.
Honestly, I wouldn't trust to do such important thing to the assistant manager
I find that Team Cohesion has a great impact on the performance stability