Poacher
no doubts, if you know how to Min/Max the attributes then you can achieve an incredible result in FM
Nice one!
tzahy said: thanks mate

NP, it's been bothering me too
OMG... I've found it finally :D


@ntr master, just post a screenshot where did you set the switching thing
Filer974 said: I just went up to the 1st league, I'm supposed to be the last

wow, then that's a very good result
Filer974 said: After 19 matches... Quiet

what was your media prediction?
maxdsn said: Here is a new tactic created by @Kiderian94. Finished 3rd with Aston Villa first season (simulation)

Can you show the result?
Nice one! :thup:
Yeahh... it seems strikerless tactics are dead :getlost:
Chewbacca said: sadly, the defense doesn't look good :(

obviously, the defense needs to be improved
MakeSuRE said: ManUtd got 1st in PL before the World Cup, with an eight-macthes-in-a-row clean sheet.

Keep in mind that what's really important is the points not the place because sometimes you can have the 1st place with only 80 pts and sometimes you're only the 2nd despite having 100 pts bet the second result is much better even you got a lower place.
Droid said: I wonder whether IWBs are still better than regular wingbacks in the beta

obviously, something has changed regarding the iwbs in the beta but I still can't figure out what exactly :)
dzek said: So for wingers we use the best side of the position familiarity of the player without care about his preferred foot?

I remember fm-arena tested that and found the preferred foot doesn't make any significant difference so you should care only abut the position familiarity.
kdr03097 said: 파이널 버전이 제일 좋나요??

Only English language is allowed on this site.
lHollow said: I have a question: Is it necessary to train the specific role? For example: Burki (POR) -> SK - SU?

I guess, the only benefits of that is increasing the tactic familiarity Roles/Duties/Positions area.
ZaZ said: You can see total goals and combine it with goals scored from corners, direct free kicks and indirect free kicks, then see the percentage of goals scored from each set piece. You can do the same for defense too. Then, you can see points per match and goal difference and use all that info to decide which set pieces are the best. It's not so simple and requires lots of runs to make sure RNG isn't playing a role in results.


Let's say in one test you got these stats:

Total Goals = 200

Goals From Corners = 50

Total Corners Taken = 100 ( but you don't know this stat )


And in other test you got these:

Total Goals = 200

Goals From Corners = 40

Total Corners Taken = 50 ( but you don't know this stat )


So without knowing Total Corners Taken the results might be very misleading because without knowing Total Corners Taken the result of the 1st test looks better than the result of the 2nd test.



But if you know Total Corners Taken:

The 1st test: Goals From Corners / Total Corners Taken = 0.5 Goals per one corner

The 2nd test: Goals From Corners / Total Corners Taken = 0.8 Goals per one corner
ZaZ said: After it's tested, if results are better than 3.2, I will update all set piece pictures. (P.S.: If someone would be so kind as to add the pictures for him, it's fine too. Running other tests now and preparing to sleep.)

How do you test set pieces?

I mean, are there any stats of total corners taken and goals scored ? Or total corners against and conceded?
Blue 3.2 AW is very good

I just won the title with Napoli

The team was predicted 4th

120 Goals Scored!