Kerem tp said: 2* There are also tacitcs like void v2 (https://fm-arena.com/tactic/959-void-ver-2-0/) with a great score but when you try this tactic with teams like az alkmar, Galatasaray, Olympiacos they never give results the same way because its a complicated tactic so even if you are a subtop team of your leage with worse players than premier league the tactic will not going to work out. Expand
It isn't supposed to give the same result with different teams and expecting something like that would be quiet stupid.
A high score in the testing indicates a high efficiency which means you will do much better than your media prediction with any team.
You should look for high Acceleration, Pace, Agility, Balance, Dribbling and Vision attributes for any position except the central defenders because having high Dribbling and Vision attributes aren't that important for them.
As far as I know you can choose the volante role for a DM position only if there are 2 or more DMs positions in your tactic and if there's only 1 DM position in your tactic then the volante role isn't available.
BulldozerJokic said: Have you seen the formation of the time wasting tactic? It doesn't replicate VOID at all Expand
Yes, it has a slight different formation but it doesn't look like a problem to me at all because if you can fit your team in the default VOID 2.0 then you also can fit your team in the time wasting version without any problem.
BulldozerJokic said: The VOID tactic is awesome, although it is not flexible with its "very attacking" mentality. The author of VOID claims that toggling the mentality down seriously affects the performance. So there is almost no way to keep the lead in tough away games, for example. Would love to see how this tactic performs in tests. Expand
Hi,
Recently, Cyborg uploaded a time wasting version of the tactic, which can be used to protect the lead.
krozan said: Media prediction for this season has me finishing 7th Expand
Having 7th media prediction with Leeds in the 2nd season is kinda crazy... could you post a screenshot of the media prediction I want to see it.
Probably, in the 1st season you overachieved at a very extreme rate(got very lucky I think) and in the 2nd season you are still overarching but at a lower rate than in the 1st season and that's a quite normal thing.
ZaZ said: I hope my set pieces work there, because I am doing over 50 holiday runs to optimize it. Expand
I really doubt there'll be any significant changes when it comes to the set pieces. I think they'll just make strikerless tactics to be less effective.
Lapidus said: As the testing revealed the Dribbling attribute is an important attribute but I'm sure its importance varies for different positions.
I don't believe Dribbling is very important for Central Defenders or it's more important than Jumping Reach for them.
It had a significant impact on the result in the testing because there are still 8 positions in the tactic(except Central Defenders) that depend on Dribbling attributes and I'm sure all that also apply to Vision attribute. Expand
I agree, such positions as GK and Central Defenders have an unique behavior, it's very different from other positions and it's obvious that such attributes as Dribbling and Vision can't have the same importance to them as to other positions.
ZaZ said: Also, the difference of 0.08 points per match is basically the difference between a 7.0 and a 6.8 tactic here, so it shouldn't be considered negligible. Expand
That's true... but the difference between 7.0 rating and 6.8 rating is about 2.9% which means a 7.0 tactic is about only 2.9% more effective than a 6.8 tactic
Mentoring doesn't do anything when it comes to the playing positions.
Hi,
I'm afraid you can't improve a player's weak foot in FM21 because that option has been removed for FM21.
No worries. I'm just letting you know that there's a tactics that looks almost the same as your tactic and that has been tested already.
As I can see both tactics have 'Positive' team mentality or I'm missing something?
What's the difference between them?
https://fm-arena.com/tactic/987-universal/
It isn't supposed to give the same result with different teams and expecting something like that would be quiet stupid.
A high score in the testing indicates a high efficiency which means you will do much better than your media prediction with any team.
You really should read this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/1076-my-tactic-doesn-t-work-help-me-please/
@ZaZ Do you have player filters for this tactic?
You really don't need any filters. Just follow this table - https://fm-arena.com/table/9-important-attributes/
You should look for high Acceleration, Pace, Agility, Balance, Dribbling and Vision attributes for any position except the central defenders because having high Dribbling and Vision attributes aren't that important for them.
Reflexes, One On Ones, Handling Agility, Command Of Area, Concentration and Communication are the most important attributes for GK
Yes, you're right.
As far as I know you can choose the volante role for a DM position only if there are 2 or more DMs positions in your tactic and if there's only 1 DM position in your tactic then the volante role isn't available.
Yes, it has a slight different formation but it doesn't look like a problem to me at all because if you can fit your team in the default VOID 2.0 then you also can fit your team in the time wasting version without any problem.
Hi,
Recently, Cyborg uploaded a time wasting version of the tactic, which can be used to protect the lead.
https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/4350/
Thanks.
Having 7th media prediction with Leeds in the 2nd season is kinda crazy... could you post a screenshot of the media prediction I want to see it.
Probably, in the 1st season you overachieved at a very extreme rate(got very lucky I think) and in the 2nd season you are still overarching but at a lower rate than in the 1st season and that's a quite normal thing.
I had an incredible season with it, won everything.
just go to the 1st post of this thread
I really doubt there'll be any significant changes when it comes to the set pieces. I think they'll just make strikerless tactics to be less effective.
I don't believe Dribbling is very important for Central Defenders or it's more important than Jumping Reach for them.
It had a significant impact on the result in the testing because there are still 8 positions in the tactic(except Central Defenders) that depend on Dribbling attributes and I'm sure all that also apply to Vision attribute.
I agree, such positions as GK and Central Defenders have an unique behavior, it's very different from other positions and it's obvious that such attributes as Dribbling and Vision can't have the same importance to them as to other positions.
That's true... but the difference between 7.0 rating and 6.8 rating is about 2.9% which means a 7.0 tactic is about only 2.9% more effective than a 6.8 tactic