Gaksital said: Thank you for the understandable explanation. Expand
You're welcome. I'm glad to see you understand that.
Gaksital said: I still haven't found another tactic exactly the same as this one Expand
Let's say you make a change CD->BPD in your tactic and offer it for testing but we have already tested that change in other different tactics many times and found that it didn't make any meaningful difference so it's highly unlikely we'll test that change once more.
We find 2-3 tactics with the same formation from one author is enough. You already have 6 tactics(4231) tested. In general, we want the number of tested tactics from one author to be reasonable and we find about 10 is enough and you've already got 16.
Also, the changes you offered for testing have been already tested many times and there's nothing new. We want to see people learn from what has been tested and they don't start from a clean slate. I hope you understand.
dakiri said: Yes, definitely agree with you both! Just pointing out that if there's a 3 games/week schedule in FM22 (even for just 1 year), it'll be even more important, and some of the lower intensity tactics that tend to score poorly here might be comparably even stronger than they appear. Expand
A high intensity tactic always will be giving you higher chances on success in a match than a low intensity tactics, like in real life when you do something at full of your capabilities your chances on success are higher than when you do that at half of your capabilities.
Using only a high intensity tactic or only a low intensity tactic all the time won't give you the best result. The trick is proper using a high intensity tactic and a low intensity tactic when there's an appropriate moment for it.
dakiri said: Hmm, I wonder if that will make FM Arena's current testing method too unrealistic? There's already the conflict where high-intensity tactics can sometimes overperform here since there's no fatigue in the testing league. With good enough players and 1-2 games per week it doesn't seem to really make a big difference in an actual save. But in FM22 if we're forced to use way more backup players due to squad fatigue, I wonder if low-intensity tactics might be a more successful season-long option, allowing the best players to play more often. Expand
Our testing just shows that in FM high intensity tactics give you better chances on success than low intensity tactics but using a high intensity tactic all the time during your game would be a quit stupid thing to do because that way you would drained the conditions of your players very fast. Don't forget you're the manager and it's up to you to decide when to use a high intensity tactic and when it'd be better to save the conditions of your players and use a low intensity tactic.
Also, don't forget it isn't necessary to use a high intensity tactic during a whole match, for example, if your team got a lead by few goals then you can change to a low intensity tactic to save the conditions of your players.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Is this the same tactic? - https://fm-arena.com/thread/1403-4-2-4-double-targeter-44-game-undefeated-streak-best-scoring-best-loss-point/
I've added v2 of Shield. I find it's slight better and more stable than v1.
Can you test, @Zippo ? I don't know how to put it in the download manager, sorry.
Hi,
I suggest creating a new thread for it.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
The tactic on the screenshot and the tactic you uploaded don't match. Could you fix that.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Hi,
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
You're welcome. I'm glad to see you understand that.
Gaksital said: I still haven't found another tactic exactly the same as this one
Let's say you make a change CD->BPD in your tactic and offer it for testing but we have already tested that change in other different tactics many times and found that it didn't make any meaningful difference so it's highly unlikely we'll test that change once more.
The way to pick the tactics of this site is too ambigious, i think. Can anyone explain why this much-changed tactic has not been tested again?
I tried not to do "brute-force cracking". but have I been too active in this quiet forum recently? I'm really curious.
Hi, @Gaksital.
We find 2-3 tactics with the same formation from one author is enough. You already have 6 tactics(4231) tested.
Also, the changes you offered for testing have been already tested many times and there's nothing new. We want to see people learn from what has been tested and they don't start from a clean slate. I hope you understand.
A high intensity tactic always will be giving you higher chances on success in a match than a low intensity tactics, like in real life when you do something at full of your capabilities your chances on success are higher than when you do that at half of your capabilities.
Using only a high intensity tactic or only a low intensity tactic all the time won't give you the best result. The trick is proper using a high intensity tactic and a low intensity tactic when there's an appropriate moment for it.
Our testing just shows that in FM high intensity tactics give you better chances on success than low intensity tactics but using a high intensity tactic all the time during your game would be a quit stupid thing to do because that way you would drained the conditions of your players very fast. Don't forget you're the manager and it's up to you to decide when to use a high intensity tactic and when it'd be better to save the conditions of your players and use a low intensity tactic.
Also, don't forget it isn't necessary to use a high intensity tactic during a whole match, for example, if your team got a lead by few goals then you can change to a low intensity tactic to save the conditions of your players.
@Carex okamotoi, hi.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
use good defenders and goalkeeper with good aerial reach
@eehr, hi.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Hi,
Please, add some result with the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic and some result with it.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, add some results with the tactic.
Thank you.