momentaryblink said: Most recent tactic comes in at 4.8, despite my testing database grading it out at 2.118 ppg (which would be a 7.0). I expected a regression with their DB, but not one that large. Was hoping for the 5.8 range and am surprised it performed that poorly.
I have to admit that I'm confused. Dino and I have worked hard to create a testing environment that mirrors the FM-Arena database and being more selective on the tactics that we/I post.
Perhaps Inter and Napoli are just that much better than Team A and Team B and we should be testing with the bottom teams in our DB?
Back to the drawing board... Expand
Just a heads-up, in the fm-arena testing league the teams are nothing more than just names. All the players and AI managers are tweaked.
ArsenalHighbury said: It’s probably already been mentioned but what is the starting value of the attributes in the attribute testing table, eg is the base value at 20 then dropped to 16 or is base value 16 then dropped to 12? Expand
If you tweaked someone else's tactic then you should put your name as the tactic's author even the changes might seem small. Just edit the opening post and give RDF credits for his work, also, add a link to his tactic.
saitjerome said: kanka tiki taka tam neresinde? pas isabetleri az sanki Expand
berdun said: kanka sienaya sürekli bir tiki taka oynattıramam tabii ki. ancak hücum geçişlerinde ve set hücumunda akıcı bir oyun oynuyoruz. top çevirme ve top dağıtımında çok güzel setler uyguluyoruz. tiki-taka dememin sebebi buydu. Expand
Hi,
This is an English speaking forum. Please, use English.
I guess I copied other people's tactics to improve my rating.
We will make sure these things never happen again. Expand
The point is that there's nothing wrong in tweaking other people's tactic but when you do that you should always give credit to them. For example, if your tactic is based on ZaZ's tactic then you should mention that in the opening post and give him credit for his work.
When your tactic is based on someone else's tactic you should always mention that and give credit to that person otherwise it looks like plagiarism and that's not cool at all.
Please, edit the opening post and add proper credits.
I would like to know how to add my Chinese forum link. You can click directly to my post.
I think in your case the best way to do that is putting the link in the opening post ( the 1st post of the thread ).
Cheers.
That's correct.
I have to admit that I'm confused. Dino and I have worked hard to create a testing environment that mirrors the FM-Arena database and being more selective on the tactics that we/I post.
Perhaps Inter and Napoli are just that much better than Team A and Team B and we should be testing with the bottom teams in our DB?
Back to the drawing board...
Just a heads-up, in the fm-arena testing league the teams are nothing more than just names. All the players and AI managers are tweaked.
You can download any game save and see for yourself - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/1976-arrowhead-1-4-4-2-2-1-1/
Hope that helps.
Cheers.
??
Hi,
This is an English speaking site. Please, use English.
Thank you.
When you propose someone else's tactic for the testing then please, post your own result with it.
Thank you.
Please, add screenshots of the tactics.
Thank you.
You can download any game save and check the default attributes - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/1639-fanecas/
Please, add a screenshot of the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, write up all the changes you made.
Thank you.
I've the edited the author.
If you tweaked someone else's tactic then you should put your name as the tactic's author even the changes might seem small. Just edit the opening post and give RDF credits for his work, also, add a link to his tactic.
Thank you.
berdun said: kanka sienaya sürekli bir tiki taka oynattıramam tabii ki. ancak hücum geçişlerinde ve set hücumunda akıcı bir oyun oynuyoruz. top çevirme ve top dağıtımında çok güzel setler uyguluyoruz. tiki-taka dememin sebebi buydu.
Hi,
This is an English speaking forum. Please, use English.
Thank you.
Total Conceded ( 281 ) and Conceded From Corners ( 27 )
Jumping Reach has been reduced by 4 points
Total Conceded ( 311 ) and Conceded From Corners ( 46 )
Total Goals ( 355 ) and Goals From Corners ( 67 )
Jumping Reach has been reduced by 4 points
Total Goals ( 313 ) and Goals From Corners ( 41 )
Please, add a screenshot of the tactic.
Thank you.
The screenshots are too small. Please, upload them as attachments.
Thanks.
Please, add a screenshot of the tactic.
Thank you.
I guess I copied other people's tactics to improve my rating.
We will make sure these things never happen again.
The point is that there's nothing wrong in tweaking other people's tactic but when you do that you should always give credit to them. For example, if your tactic is based on ZaZ's tactic then you should mention that in the opening post and give him credit for his work.
Do you agree with that?
When your tactic is based on someone else's tactic you should always mention that and give credit to that person otherwise it looks like plagiarism and that's not cool at all.
Please, edit the opening post and add proper credits.
Thank you.
Hi,
Please, explain what changes you made.
Thank you.