Zippo
Mark said: Here is the download link to my updated ratings file for Genie Scout.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/r55jwbdutrq19n6/MDW22.grf?dl=0

The ratings are calculated off the attributes testing and the position weight table. See the previous post from last years game for more details.

You should save the standard FMGS ratings file before loading and changing to this file so you can reload the default if you are not happy with my ratings.

The standard place for Genie Scout ratings files is C:\FM Genie Scout 22g\Ratings. If you did a custom install it will be in a folder called Ratings under the FMGS install directory. Once you have copied the file to the correct location you should be able to select my ratings file by clicking on the GS symbol in the top left of the screen, and then clicking Ratings in the drop down menu, and then MDW22 from the sub menu. 

I have adjusted the weightings this year to try and align all the positions, as previously Wingers had much higher ratings.

Enjoy



@Mark, good work.

I think it deserves having its own thread
@TacticMaster, hi.

Please, post your own results with the tactic.

Thank you.
@TacticMaster , hi.

Please, post your own results with the tactic.

Thank you.
@chelsea fan, hi.

Please, add a screenshot of the tactic and some results with it.

Thank you.
@magicnut, hi.

Please, post your own result with the tactic.

Thank you.
RalfRangnick said: 作者你好 请问是否愿意将战术发布在爆棚论坛

Hi,

Please, use English.

Thank you.
rego8 said: i uploaded again thank you

Please, could you remove the tactic that was upload by accident.
@CSTG KANE, there was no need in creating a new thread, you could just edit the opening post by clicking the Edit button.
ZaZ said: No, if it's like you say, it doesn't even make sense to test. Should I remove it?

No, it's too late. They are under the test already.

Btw, I might be wrong about the Pass Into Space TI but I'm 99% sure that what I said is correct. Yeah, I'm sure we all wish FM to be more transparent about how the things work.
ZaZ said: Then it makes sense that I got inconclusive results, since the TI is doing absolutely nothing. Thanks for the clarification!

We'll test the new versions you upload but I just don't want you to be misled by the RNG
ZaZ said: I took the freedom to upload your version together with mine, I hope you don't mind. In my experiments, pass into space and stay on feet didn't perform as well for strong team, but performed better for weak team, so the only way to know which one is better is testing here.

As far as I know the "Pass Into Space" TI just adds "Take More Risk" PI to all the positions and that's all but usually, the "Take More Risk" PI is already present so adding "Pass Into Space" TI won't have any effect.

As I already said the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) can be as high as 7.5% so when you make a very small change or a change that doesn't make any difference then the RNG can easily send you in a wrong direction and I think it's very important to understand that.
cptdoggo said: Added a version with a minor tweak: Dribble more on central defenders. I am curious as to if this makes any difference in conceding/scoring since everyone seems to use it. If the team could test this out I would appreciate very much.

unfortunately, the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) is bigger than the difference of that change so there's no point in testing it.
V4N DAMAGE said: I've added the screenshot for you.
Thank you!

V4N DAMAGE said: The corner tweak is literally just my attacking corners added, i left everything else as it was.
Even the change is very small but it isn't the original tactic anymore and you just can't put the name of the original author on it.
@V4N DAMAGE, hi.

Please, add a screenshots of the tactic to the opening post ( it should have the TIs and Mentality ).

Is the "a-jack-of-diamonds Corner Tweak" tactic your tweak of the "a-jack-of-diamonds" tactic ? If it is, then you should put your own name on it.

Thank you.
@super korean, hi.

Please, post the changes between the versions.

Thank you.
@RalfRangnick, hi.

Please, post your own result with the tactic.

Thank you.
@V4N DAMAGE, hi.

Please, add a screenshot of the tactic.

Thank you.
@dakka, hi.

Please, post your own result with the tactic.

Thank you.
Your comments are highly appreciated! Please, keep them coming! :thup:

The discussion here will help us to come up with the most optimal solution.

We want to hear as many people as possible.
@rego8, hi.

I've edited the author and tactic name.

When you tweak someone else' tactic then you should put your own name on it even the changes you made  might seem small.

Thank you.