cptdoggo said: Added a version with a minor tweak: Dribble more on central defenders. I am curious as to if this makes any difference in conceding/scoring since everyone seems to use it. If the team could test this out I would appreciate very much. Expand
unfortunately, the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) is bigger than the difference of that change so there's no point in testing it.
V4N DAMAGE said: I've added the screenshot for you. Expand Thank you!
V4N DAMAGE said: The corner tweak is literally just my attacking corners added, i left everything else as it was. Expand Even the change is very small but it isn't the original tactic anymore and you just can't put the name of the original author on it.
Please tell us what you think about the Plagiarism problem and how we should handle it. Your opinions is very important to us!
Unfortunately, we've seen conflicts happen more and more often and we must come up with a solution. It's common to see people copy high rated tactics and post them as their own work without giving credits or make few insignificant changes and say that their tactics "inspired by" when it's obvious that 99% of the tactic it isn't their work and "inspired by" doesn't look like appropriate credits. Also, copying set pieces is a very common thing.
We want to hear your thoughts/opinions:
- How it can be proven that someone copied other person's tactic? What criteria should be used?
- Should there be a "punishment" for taking someone else's work without giving credits, if it should, then what kind of "punishment" it should be.
99357 said: and so? credits should be given where its due or fm-arena is encouraging silent plagiarism many will just take a top tactic here, change few roles and call it their own Expand
I agree, something must be done about it. Soon, we'll come up with a solution.
@Dino, I agree with @Chewbacca. Please, edit the OP and add that "Rush" tactic is revelation's tweak with SS instead of AF and "Rush 4" tactic is revelation's tweak with SS instead of AF and IWs instead of IFs.
beinEthen said: That's the top source. The last post from my friend can be set. But I can not find the post how to set. Expand
Your friend was able to add the "external source" link because he was sharing not his own tactic but you can't do that because you share your own tactic.
As I said if you want to add a link to the Chinese forum then the only way to do that is putting the link in the opening post ( the 1st post of the thread ).
unfortunately, the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) is bigger than the difference of that change so there's no point in testing it.
Thank you!
V4N DAMAGE said: The corner tweak is literally just my attacking corners added, i left everything else as it was.
Even the change is very small but it isn't the original tactic anymore and you just can't put the name of the original author on it.
Please, add a screenshots of the tactic to the opening post ( it should have the TIs and Mentality ).
Is the "a-jack-of-diamonds Corner Tweak" tactic your tweak of the "a-jack-of-diamonds" tactic ? If it is, then you should put your own name on it.
Thank you.
Please, post the changes between the versions.
Thank you.
Please, post your own result with the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, add a screenshot of the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, post your own result with the tactic.
Thank you.
The discussion here will help us to come up with the most optimal solution.
We want to hear as many people as possible.
I've edited the author and tactic name.
When you tweak someone else' tactic then you should put your own name on it even the changes you made might seem small.
Thank you.
Please tell us what you think about the Plagiarism problem and how we should handle it. Your opinions is very important to us!
Unfortunately, we've seen conflicts happen more and more often and we must come up with a solution. It's common to see people copy high rated tactics and post them as their own work without giving credits or make few insignificant changes and say that their tactics "inspired by" when it's obvious that 99% of the tactic it isn't their work and "inspired by" doesn't look like appropriate credits. Also, copying set pieces is a very common thing.
We want to hear your thoughts/opinions:
- How it can be proven that someone copied other person's tactic? What criteria should be used?
- Should there be a "punishment" for taking someone else's work without giving credits, if it should, then what kind of "punishment" it should be.
Looking forward to your comments.
Cheers.
Thank you.
many will just take a top tactic here, change few roles and call it their own
I agree, something must be done about it. Soon, we'll come up with a solution.
Stay tuned!
Send me a personal message - PM what name would you like to have.
It's working now. Cheers.
@lizhidegemen, please add some results with the tactic.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi,
Please, read this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/1661-how-fm-arena-picks-tactics-for-the-testing/
If your tactic is a tweak of someone else's tactic then give credits, provide a link to the original tactic and write up the tweaks you made.
Thank you.
Your friend was able to add the "external source" link because he was sharing not his own tactic but you can't do that because you share your own tactic.
As I said if you want to add a link to the Chinese forum then the only way to do that is putting the link in the opening post ( the 1st post of the thread ).