ZaZ said: No, if it's like you say, it doesn't even make sense to test. Should I remove it? Expand
No, it's too late. They are under the test already.
Btw, I might be wrong about the Pass Into Space TI but I'm 99% sure that what I said is correct. Yeah, I'm sure we all wish FM to be more transparent about how the things work.
ZaZ said: I took the freedom to upload your version together with mine, I hope you don't mind. In my experiments, pass into space and stay on feet didn't perform as well for strong team, but performed better for weak team, so the only way to know which one is better is testing here. Expand
As far as I know the "Pass Into Space" TI just adds "Take More Risk" PI to all the positions and that's all but usually, the "Take More Risk" PI is already present so adding "Pass Into Space" TI won't have any effect.
As I already said the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) can be as high as 7.5% so when you make a very small change or a change that doesn't make any difference then the RNG can easily send you in a wrong direction and I think it's very important to understand that.
cptdoggo said: Added a version with a minor tweak: Dribble more on central defenders. I am curious as to if this makes any difference in conceding/scoring since everyone seems to use it. If the team could test this out I would appreciate very much. Expand
unfortunately, the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) is bigger than the difference of that change so there's no point in testing it.
V4N DAMAGE said: I've added the screenshot for you. Expand Thank you!
V4N DAMAGE said: The corner tweak is literally just my attacking corners added, i left everything else as it was. Expand Even the change is very small but it isn't the original tactic anymore and you just can't put the name of the original author on it.
Please tell us what you think about the Plagiarism problem and how we should handle it. Your opinions is very important to us!
Unfortunately, we've seen conflicts happen more and more often and we must come up with a solution. It's common to see people copy high rated tactics and post them as their own work without giving credits or make few insignificant changes and say that their tactics "inspired by" when it's obvious that 99% of the tactic it isn't their work and "inspired by" doesn't look like appropriate credits. Also, copying set pieces is a very common thing.
We want to hear your thoughts/opinions:
- How it can be proven that someone copied other person's tactic? What criteria should be used?
- Should there be a "punishment" for taking someone else's work without giving credits, if it should, then what kind of "punishment" it should be.
Please, add a screenshot of the tactic and some results with it.
Thank you.
Please, post your own result with the tactic.
Thank you.
Hi,
Please, use English.
Thank you.
Please, could you remove the tactic that was upload by accident.
No, it's too late. They are under the test already.
Btw, I might be wrong about the Pass Into Space TI but I'm 99% sure that what I said is correct. Yeah, I'm sure we all wish FM to be more transparent about how the things work.
We'll test the new versions you upload but I just don't want you to be misled by the RNG
As far as I know the "Pass Into Space" TI just adds "Take More Risk" PI to all the positions and that's all but usually, the "Take More Risk" PI is already present so adding "Pass Into Space" TI won't have any effect.
As I already said the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) can be as high as 7.5% so when you make a very small change or a change that doesn't make any difference then the RNG can easily send you in a wrong direction and I think it's very important to understand that.
unfortunately, the RNG of 2 runs ( 304 matches ) is bigger than the difference of that change so there's no point in testing it.
Thank you!
V4N DAMAGE said: The corner tweak is literally just my attacking corners added, i left everything else as it was.
Even the change is very small but it isn't the original tactic anymore and you just can't put the name of the original author on it.
Please, add a screenshots of the tactic to the opening post ( it should have the TIs and Mentality ).
Is the "a-jack-of-diamonds Corner Tweak" tactic your tweak of the "a-jack-of-diamonds" tactic ? If it is, then you should put your own name on it.
Thank you.
Please, post the changes between the versions.
Thank you.
Please, post your own result with the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, add a screenshot of the tactic.
Thank you.
Please, post your own result with the tactic.
Thank you.
The discussion here will help us to come up with the most optimal solution.
We want to hear as many people as possible.
I've edited the author and tactic name.
When you tweak someone else' tactic then you should put your own name on it even the changes you made might seem small.
Thank you.
Please tell us what you think about the Plagiarism problem and how we should handle it. Your opinions is very important to us!
Unfortunately, we've seen conflicts happen more and more often and we must come up with a solution. It's common to see people copy high rated tactics and post them as their own work without giving credits or make few insignificant changes and say that their tactics "inspired by" when it's obvious that 99% of the tactic it isn't their work and "inspired by" doesn't look like appropriate credits. Also, copying set pieces is a very common thing.
We want to hear your thoughts/opinions:
- How it can be proven that someone copied other person's tactic? What criteria should be used?
- Should there be a "punishment" for taking someone else's work without giving credits, if it should, then what kind of "punishment" it should be.
Looking forward to your comments.
Cheers.
Thank you.