NERU said: The assistent put defensive midfilders at Shadow striker That explains some results in the tactic test... if you want to use this tactic it take some time to train your striker or your wingers to play at CAM and shadow striker.
If you play in a underdog team, change to the mentality to positive or cautious Expand
There are no defensive midfielders or central midfielders or attacking midfielders in our testing league.
We use universal midfielders to test tactics that have DM/MC/AMC positions.
This year we intentionally merged DM/MC/AMC positions because it better represents what we get when we play the game in normal way.
If your tactic is based on someone else's work or it uses some elements of other tactics then you should give proper credit for that in the OP. Please, update the OP and do that.
ZaZ said: I have updated the important attributes in first post. I also created a separated thread for it in the general section, which @Zippo coult kindly pin if possible. Expand
If you ask my opinion then I would not blindly follow it.
For example, if look at the central defenders spreadsheet then you'll see that "Long Throws" and "Crossing" has more weight than "Heading" but we know that Central Defenders don't take throw-ins and don't do crosses but they take a lot of headers so I don't understand how "Long Throws" and "Crossing" can be more important than Heading for Central Defenders... that doesn't make sense at all
KOniGun said: Hi, sorry but I wouldn't have time to launch an entire season for V2, I actually play all my seasons to test, I don't simulate them. Expand
No worries, we'll test V1 but V2 will be put on hold until you can provide some results.
KOniGun said: V2 has made the tactic leak alot less goals without taking away from the goal scoring both versions scored 145 goals in the league however V1 conceded 22 goals and V2 only conceded 10 goals
Changes: Roaming playmaker changed to centre midfielder some player instructions changed Expand
Hi,
It also requires posting results for V2 ( table/fixtures )
If you play in a underdog team, change to the mentality to positive or cautious
There are no defensive midfielders or central midfielders or attacking midfielders in our testing league.
We use universal midfielders to test tactics that have DM/MC/AMC positions.
This year we intentionally merged DM/MC/AMC positions because it better represents what we get when we play the game in normal way.
I hope that helps.
Cheers.
@Heisenberg, hi.
I agree with @ZaZ.
If your tactic is based on someone else's work or it uses some elements of other tactics then you should give proper credit for that in the OP. Please, update the OP and do that.
Thank you.
If you ask my opinion then I would not blindly follow it.
For example, if look at the central defenders spreadsheet then you'll see that "Long Throws" and "Crossing" has more weight than "Heading" but we know that Central Defenders don't take throw-ins and don't do crosses but they take a lot of headers so I don't understand how "Long Throws" and "Crossing" can be more important than Heading for Central Defenders... that doesn't make sense at all
Please, post your own result with the tactic ( table / fixtures )
Thank you.
Please, post your own result with the tactic and a screenshot of the tactic.
Thank you.
I've changed that for you.
Cheers.
Ok, now the external source link is correct but you still need to post your own results with the tactic ( fixtures / table ).
When I follow the external source link I still can't find the tactic that you posted in the opening post.
Forum name "a876244515"
the same person
I've edited the author name and changed it to "a876244515"
Please, in future always refer to a forum nickname because it's the only way I can identify the author.
Still the tactics don't match. In the opening post I see a different tactic than the external link shows me.
No worries, we'll test V1 but V2 will be put on hold until you can provide some results.
Changes:
Roaming playmaker changed to centre midfielder
some player instructions changed
Hi,
It also requires posting results for V2 ( table/fixtures )
Thanks.
TACTIC from china forum
Sorry, I can't identify the tactic and author.
When I follow the external source link I see a different tactic than you posted in the opening post, also, I see a different author - "a876244515".
TACTIC form China forum
Sorry, I can't identify the tactic and author.
When I follow the external source link I get this:
Please, post your own result with the tactic (table/fixtures)
Thank you.
The external source link is invalid. Please, fix it.
Thank you.
The external source link is invalid. Please, fix it.
Thank you.
The external source link is invalid. Please, fix it.
Thank you.
Please, post your own results with the tactic (table/fixtures).
Thank you.
Please, post your own results with the tactic.
Also, keep the information about the tactic in the 1st post, you can update it if needed.
Thank you.
Please, post your own results with the tactic.
Thank you.