Lad its impressive that you won the league with it..Whats not impressive is that its in 2029....Lets have it tested nevertheless but my hopes aren't up for it if im honest
Middleweight165 said: Sure. I'm just interested in the process. Did he notice something that could be improved or did he just randomly change things to see the difference. Just a personal interest to see how these changes came about Expand
I think he probably noticed that the advanced forward can be a tiny bit more efficient when centralized or maybe he ran it in a test league to verify this..But the efficiency between the tweak and original is still rather marginal and not even a fact it is better at all if you do another few runs hypothetically..
Middleweight165 said: @Pulsar I know you've mentioned the changes you've made but can you explain why these changes make the tactic better? Expand
Lad I think the tactical nuances of making a tactic better is often quite hard to Explain and often is just a nature of a specific patch scripts that make certain approaches better or worse.
The lad tried to keep thangs Simple with the tactic but as we all know simple isn't the way to go on football manager. You have to instruct many thangs with team and individual instructions in order for the players to really perform and overachieve.
Zippo said: it was long time ago, as I said now there's no difference between Team A and Team B, having 2 teams just allows to test for more matches per one run. Expand
I see in that case is it just a coincidence that every single time my tactic scored a lot higher in team A?
Well looks like a somewhat of an imporvement over v1 at least.. (based on the 2 runs) , lets wait for third..Still thinking how increase with underdog reputation..
Zippo said: Both teams have the same reputation, there's no difference between Team A and Team B Expand
Isn't the difference between team A and B was suppose to be reputation or what is the difference in current test?
Well looks like a somewhat of an imporvement over v1 at least.. (based on the 2 runs) , lets wait for third..Still thinking how increase with underdog reputation..
Hello plz if possible can u test Apeshyitt version 2. After observing version one I had came up with a seemingly improved (at least result wise but I think also play wise) version of the tactic with a bit revised roles and player instructions. Final league table 114 pts and +100goaldifference started to develop version 2 since february.
I am testing now 2.0 system but the changes would be relatively subtle with small role tweak namely dlp:segundo volante and sk support:defend and a few more subtle changes hopefully they go a long way for the Better. Now is february in the save if results are consistent with 2.0 and i see improvement only then change..but so far first game sunjic 8.3 average rating as volante support with assist already .
While the tactic tested higher than any tactic I uploaded so far and really good under favorite reputation , it suffers from the still-present effect of reputational adjustment of AI management that humbles its performance under the underdog reputation. Still , a half decent result.
Results have been good so far but I want to get the season through to make a conclusion...But kept 5 *edit:now 8* clean sheets in a row and never fail to score!
https://fm-base.co.uk/resources/%F0%9F%94%A5arnolds-4-2-3-1-by-narrra-aka-arnold-leeds-two-back-to-back-champions-leagues-%F0%9F%8F%86%F0%9F%8F%86%F0%9F%94%A5.1223/
https://fm-base.co.uk/resources/apepyss-version-2-by-magicnut-tested-with-atalanta-seria-a-first-season-92pts.1178/
https://fm-base.co.uk/resources/%F0%9F%94%A5%F0%9F%94%A5%F0%9F%94%A5%F0%9F%94%A5crackpistons-4-1-1-4-version-one-%F0%9F%94%A5%F0%9F%94%A5%F0%9F%94%A5%F0%9F%94%A5.1194/
I think he probably noticed that the advanced forward can be a tiny bit more efficient when centralized or maybe he ran it in a test league to verify this..But the efficiency between the tweak and original is still rather marginal and not even a fact it is better at all if you do another few runs hypothetically..
Lad I think the tactical nuances of making a tactic better is often quite hard to Explain and often is just a nature of a specific patch scripts that make certain approaches better or worse.
I see in that case is it just a coincidence that every single time my tactic scored a lot higher in team A?
Zippo said: Both teams have the same reputation, there's no difference between Team A and Team B
Isn't the difference between team A and B was suppose to be reputation or what is the difference in current test?
After observing version one I had came up with a seemingly improved (at least result wise but I think also play wise) version of the tactic with a bit revised roles and player instructions.
Final league table 114 pts and +100goaldifference started to develop version 2 since february.