Rollerbob said: Wow, this tactic is immense. Admittedly, I'm playing with a very strong side, but I've played 17 games with this tac, won 14, drawn 3, lost 0.
In that time, we've scored 59 goals, and conceded 14.
Previously, I was using ZaZ Blue 3.0, which is a beast, but this one (somehow) seems better in both attack and defense. Madness. Expand
crazyfmguy93 said: Why does my player worth so little versus AI players? Lets hear your advices for buy players with less cost, also sell players with more money. Expand
The value of a player closely tied to his reputation, which can vary from 0 to 10,000. The reputation of a player increases when he wins highly reputable competitions such as Champions League, English Premier League, Spanish Liga and so on...
If a player plays in low reputable competitions then his value never will be as high as it could be.
Eric said: I've noticed that in Tookajobs's video the assistant manager picked this starting eleven for Chelsea:
The assistant manager choice of the best starting eleven for the tactic proves once again that unfortunately, even the best assistant manager can't properly pick the team for many tactics and testing tactics this way is a bad idea.
He picked very slow players for the tactic such as Marcos Alonso, César Azpilicueta and Thiago Silva:
But Chelsea's best starting elven for this tactic should look like this... Timo Werner, Mateo Kovacic, Callum Hudson-Odoi, Reece James and Antonio Rüdiger should be picked but they were left on the bench...
Expand
The main purpose of such videos is just to entertain people and show tactics so I wouldn't take the results seriously because you can't test a tactic just plugging it and going on Holiday... that's just ridiculous
Hazyjane said: Hi,OP and every one else. Xbox player also. What width does this tactic use? I'd like to give it a try. I have been using a fairly similar one, with some slightly different instructions, but it's gone to pot since 2.4 update Expand
Mark said: Cant believe that. I won 5 games straight with it with an underdog team. Oh well, good to know Expand
Hehe As it can be seen down below in my Tottenham save the season started quite well for me as well. I got 7 wins after 8 matches but then everything felt apart... I think it proves that 5 matches or even 9 matches isn't enough to test a tactic
Can someone tell me a bit more about inverted wing back ? I don't know what kind of players i should look for..
Btw, I look forward testing it with small teams so no top players.
Cheers Expand
I prefer having players like Joe Gomez, Éder Militão, Kieran Tierney and other similar players because they are able to cover multiple positions in the tactic, for example, the BPDs and IWBs positions.
ZaZ said: Low intensity compared to Blue 2.0. My main goal was to concede less goals and keep a similar win ratio, while having as low intensity as possible. That is the most I can go without sacrificing too much in performance. For even lower intensity, you can use the one from Magician. Expand
I think the point of this thread was having a tactic that offers the most effective "conditions" saving mode and something like that is only possible when the intensity bar is in the green zone.
If you need a defensive tactic then it's a different story because a defensive tactic might not be a low intensity tactic.
You can't tag a tactic with the intensity bar in the red zone as a low intensity tactic.
ZaZ said: Other than Weymouth, the worst position for Blue 2.0 was an 8th place. It also won che championship 18 out of 20 times, getting in promotion range 28 out of 40 times. For comparison, Phoenix won only 11 times and got in promotion range 26 times, very similar to Viola. Blue 1.0 would also fall in that range, probably, since the three have very similar performance. Expand
Mark said: An important thing worth noting is that ZaZ Blue 2.0 produced 18 champions from the 40 seasons across all leagues including one for a lowest ranked side. This is without buying any players. Very impressive. Expand
Only the points per match are important and the final standing means nothing because the standing depends on the performance of the AI teams which can greatly vary and depends on many random factors so in one test some of AI managers can do very good and in other test they might do poor.
Mark said: OK, the results are in. Just under 1800 games for each tactic.
Points per match by league using top ranked and lowest ranked sides:
I think ZaZ Blue 2.0 is a clear winner for lower league management. Expand
Good work, Mark.
But when you look at your points per match table I don't think you can determine which tactic is a clear winner because there's like a 3.5% between the tactics and probably, if you remove all random factors like fm-arena does in its testing then you'll get less than a 1.5% difference between the tactic when you look at the points per watch and that's why all three tactics are rated 7.0 because a 1.5% difference is almost nothing
I guess the attacking midfielders should be the main scorers
Natural Fitness is how fast a player recovers after injuries or something like that so it's a different story.
I would advise not to look for a high tackling attribute for CM(a) or DLP(s), I think only the central defenders need it.
Maybe, @ZaZ has a different opinion.
In that time, we've scored 59 goals, and conceded 14.
Previously, I was using ZaZ Blue 3.0, which is a beast, but this one (somehow) seems better in both attack and defense. Madness.
Can you share some screenshots?
The value of a player closely tied to his reputation, which can vary from 0 to 10,000. The reputation of a player increases when he wins highly reputable competitions such as Champions League, English Premier League, Spanish Liga and so on...
If a player plays in low reputable competitions then his value never will be as high as it could be.
"Determination" is responsible for that.
Only 1.122 Goals Againts... that's impressive
The assistant manager choice of the best starting eleven for the tactic proves once again that unfortunately, even the best assistant manager can't properly pick the team for many tactics and testing tactics this way is a bad idea.
He picked very slow players for the tactic such as Marcos Alonso, César Azpilicueta and Thiago Silva:
But Chelsea's best starting elven for this tactic should look like this... Timo Werner, Mateo Kovacic, Callum Hudson-Odoi, Reece James and Antonio Rüdiger should be picked but they were left on the bench...
The main purpose of such videos is just to entertain people and show tactics so I wouldn't take the results seriously because you can't test a tactic just plugging it and going on Holiday... that's just ridiculous
The default width for Positive mentality.
I easily won La Liga with Atletico Madrid.
Thanks.
I won La Liga with 105 pts and also, I got Champions League Cup defeating FC Bayern in the final.
Hehe
Can someone tell me a bit more about inverted wing back ? I don't know what kind of players i should look for..
Btw, I look forward testing it with small teams so no top players.
Cheers
I prefer having players like Joe Gomez, Éder Militão, Kieran Tierney and other similar players because they are able to cover multiple positions in the tactic, for example, the BPDs and IWBs positions.
I think the point of this thread was having a tactic that offers the most effective "conditions" saving mode and something like that is only possible when the intensity bar is in the green zone.
If you need a defensive tactic then it's a different story because a defensive tactic might not be a low intensity tactic.
You can't tag a tactic with the intensity bar in the red zone as a low intensity tactic.
You can't have all at once.
Mark said: An important thing worth noting is that ZaZ Blue 2.0 produced 18 champions from the 40 seasons across all leagues including one for a lowest ranked side. This is without buying any players. Very impressive.
Only the points per match are important and the final standing means nothing because the standing depends on the performance of the AI teams which can greatly vary and depends on many random factors so in one test some of AI managers can do very good and in other test they might do poor.
Points per match by league using top ranked and lowest ranked sides:
I think ZaZ Blue 2.0 is a clear winner for lower league management.
Good work, Mark.
But when you look at your points per match table I don't think you can determine which tactic is a clear winner because there's like a 3.5% between the tactics and probably, if you remove all random factors like fm-arena does in its testing then you'll get less than a 1.5% difference between the tactic when you look at the points per watch and that's why all three tactics are rated 7.0 because a 1.5% difference is almost nothing