Nikko
Thanks, for this test, @Zippo :thup:
I just wonder why SI makes team instructions that duplicate the effect of player instructions, just to make the game even more confusing? :blink:
Great tactic!

I've won everything with Arsenal! :cool:



CBP87 said: Sorry, just read my replies back and I'm coming aross as a bit shitty. Wasn't my intention. I get what you're saying though and appreciate it can be confusing. It just helps me identify my tactics a little better and previously the v1 or v2 made identifying how the tactic performed a little tricky as I would have to go and do some digging where as putting the points tally in the name gives me a better indicition at a glance

:thup:


CBP87 said: Like I said that's your opinion.

I do add a version number if the same points total is achieved. I'm not going to change how I name my tactics, you're the only person that seems to have an issue with it.

I've been posting tactics using this naming method for years and you're the first person to moan about it.


That's ok, pal.

As I said, no offense. I just wanted to understand the logic behind that way of naming tactics.

Peace. :)
CBP87 said: Ok well that's your opinion mate, but I prefer to put the points in the name as it helps me identify the tactic, I think it provides a more unique identifier than v1 or v2

But what if two of your tactics/versions hit the same points in your tests? in this can you need to find some workout around.

Why not putting any information that helps identify the tactic in the description and keep the tactic name as clean as possible?

My mind is blowing when I see people come with name likes:

"433mybestevertactic 100pts LW IF KKTW ATTACK MANY GOALS"

For God sake... that's madness :)
CBP87 said: what's the difference?

"the versions names" consist less character and it's easy to memorize them and refer to. Also, they makes sense, by looking at the version numbers you can conclude which tactics were released earlier/later.

"the points names" complete makes no sense and I always wonder what's the point in putting them in tactic names.
@CBP87, no offense but what's the point in using "101p", "103p", "111p" in tactic names instead of "v1", "v2", "v3"

The "points" thing looks unlogical, ambiguous and unnecessary.

The "versions" thing look clean and nice.

I just really don't get it. :)
@letsgo9, we need to test more tactics with Mark Tighter PI :D , I think it might make a solid difference
Joexaw said: And what's the opponents stats? Thanks!

It's the same.
ryan3 said: Is this what the 23.4 (N) patch is for?

Yes.
Poacher said: There can't be different opinions that the design behind the role attributes is terrible and should be redone long time ago and it's really embarrassing that we still have it.

I think SI should focus on improving the exiting features instead bringing new and useless one
This is really an eye-opener, thanks.
Zippo said: Probably, the first wave of test results on the new tactic testing league should pop up in the next couple of hours.

The delay occurred because we couldn't apply a fix that protects the AI managers from being sacked, it didn't happen often but still happened and added a negative impact on the accuracy of the testing but now it's been sorted out.


Awesome :thup:
ed favaro said: hey can I ask what skin is that

Hi,

OPZ Elite 2023
I got 99 points with Atletico Madrid, not too shabby... I guess :cool:

Diego Simeone would be proud of me. :D





This tactic is the best 4231 that I've tried in the new patch :thup:

Here's my result with Newcastle