Gianaa9
Uaing CF(Su) instead of PF(Su)
Yuri said: Hello friend, is your last tactic good defensively?

To be honest as you can see, using a striker instead of a midfielder leads to allow more goals, maybe if you want something more solid in defense, you should use 4231s like Katana one
CBP87 said: Have you seen team C in the last run (Test 10)? Bravo mate, Bravo. 196 points!!!
Also very consistent, looking at the points scored in the first and second run, test 1 - 3 and 4 - 6, both scored 2007 points!!


My aim was exactly finding a consistent tactic, glad it turned out to be pretty good!
karateviktor said: what type of af do you need for these kind of tactics to work?
with fullbacks id imagine jumpingreach/heading since there will be a lot of crossing?

I tried "Levante x Pirate 2" but in a half season my best striker scored only 2 goals (15+ in previous seasons), but he also has heading/jumpingreach around 8..

e: Giuseppe Caso is the same type of striker it seems. Hmm


I don't pay attention to players i use with Frosinone cause it's so bad in respect to other teams that the difference would be minimal. In my careers i use fast players with good finishing and movement off the ball, and i also watch atrributes like jumping reach, heading and aggression. I also try to have 180+ cm strikers
CBP87 said: Positive mentality....



Well done mate


Yep, just like Box Levante x Pirate 2 did, already tested with attacking and now waiting for balanced one result, already uploaded few hours ago e.e
Trying with Balanced mentality instead of Attacking
Using Positive mentality instead of Attacking
Trying to merge Katana 4231 right flank with Striker Madness V5 left flank in offensive roles
Using Katana 4231 logic for defensive roles
Triyng attacking mentality on 4213 Striker Madness V5
Removed Dribble More from all positions
Removed Focus on both flanks
Lapidus said: He already said that the positions have only 2 PIs: Dribble More and Tackle Harder.

oh sorry i just thought they were regarding only FBs, don’t know why, thank you!
Could you provide IF and FB PIs? I think that using Hold Up on IFs could improve Overlaps’ rating respect to others one, did you used it?
Thank You!
CBP87 said: Is the tactic download 99p mate? I cant check as I'm not on my laptop

nop it's the 104 pts
Uploaded wrong tactic i guess, but still great result!! ahah
Trying with PF(A) instead of AF(A)
Trying Sk(Su) instead of SK(De)
Returned to FBs and trying to use marking with Mark Tighter
Added Cross From Byline on FBs
Tried with asymmetric FB/WB