Gianaa9
AF(A) -> PF(S)
PF(S) -> PF(D)
Removed CutInsideWithTheBall from left FB(A)
Added RunWideWithTheBall on left FB(A)
CBP87 said: It's not the same pal, albeit all I added was be more expressive. Just wanted to see if this had any impact on the end result plus I also wanted to see how it would test with run at defence

There isn't BeMoreExpressive in the picture... but if it's really the same tactic it could be random effect

Edit:
I checked and it looks to be identical to the top one
Removed StayNarrow from right IF(A)
Removed TakeMoreRisks from left FB(A)
Added MoreDirectPasses on right FB(A)
IF(S) -> AP(S)
IF(A) -> RMD(A)
Ws(S) -> WTs(A)
DM(S) -> VOL(A)
IFs(S) -> Ws(S)
PF(S) -> AF(A)
FBs(A) -> IWBs(S)
Removed FocusPlay on both flanks
Trying asymmetric PI for the IFs inspired by 4231 Miracle from WC. Also tried to add PlayForSetPieces and PlayOutFromDefence
Trying 433 with three DMs and double IF on support on the front
DLP -> DM
fmanagerenjoyer said: Hello. Is left footed cb is necessary or it is only a choice?

It depends on what are you asking him to do. Is he a traditional CB? Or maybe you require him to build up? His teammates already have good passing skills? Are you starting your actions from your defenders? Are you mainly using left side of the field? Do you often require your centerbacks to play ball on thei flank? Answering these questions i think you could understand if you need it or not, often in 4atb shape a right footed defender with a "Reasonable" left foot is enough..
Trying double WCB(A) combination + DLP + WB(S).

DISCLAIMER: This tactic is one of the most succesful i've ever tried, in terms of defensive solidity and goalscoring, but it's also very risky so make sure to have very accomplished players before use it, and consider that being a tactic with some "unusal" roles it could take a bit before your team will feel comfortable.
WB(S) -> WB(A) (both)
SS(A) -> AM(A)
Trying double libero 3 atb shape with two SS instead of IFs
Added DribbleMore on VOL(A),FB(A),IWB(S),DM(S)
Removed RunAtDefence
AF(A) -> PF(S)
PF(S) -> PF(D)
Diogo20 said: Oh i see, left winger need left foot & high speed and good for cross ?

exactly
Diogo20 said: Thanks, Lwb is like to dm position ?

In possession phase he act like a Dm, so i'd use a player with good passing/positioning attributes, more than pace/crossing ones that are more typical for a traditional left back
Diogo20 said: Hi,this version better than older version?
If away game change the mentaily is better?


Yes it is, you could change mentality to Balanced if you're winning in last minutes, otherwise i'd go with Attacking
Removed MoveIntoChannels from PF(S)