Costacurta said: Hi, to see a close game out when winning, would you suggest making any changes to the tactic? Expand
I took a lot to convince myself, but i noticed that sticking to Balanced mentality is almost always the best choice, so trust it even if you're losing/winning. I often use "Demand More" also when i'm winning to close out it when i'm afraid of an opponent comeback, but i know that often it happens anyways, the only advice i can give is to anticipate subs, especially FBs and DMs in order to have more freshness in defensive roles, but i think that this isn't about the tactic, but more about shouts/pep talks
at0myq said: Does the Complete Forward need to be the better striker? Expand
If it can help you, these are examples of players i use for AF (Corsini) and CF (Meyer). As you can see Meyer is way more "complete", instead Corsini has attributes more focused on Pace,Acceleration,Dribbling and Jumping Reach, which are the more effective ones for offensive roles. Meyer has instead these but also good Passing, Vision and Balance, that i think are very important to collect the ball and deliver it to IFs or AF effectively. Hope it could help!
at0myq said: Does the Complete Forward need to be the better striker? Expand
I'd say: put your best finisher as AF and your "offensive regista" as CF, the idea is that your CF will lye between attack and midfield and will often drops to collect the ball, so it should have good passing attributes moreover pace/shooting like a normal striker. It isn't so easy to find a good CF (at least, it wasn't in my careers) but you have to think it like a false 9 merged with a finisher
bwig said: no, absolutely right. You have to test it. There should be a system, that those get tested but then not listed if providing no difference. But maybe it makes no sense at all , because where to draw the line who was the creator. Expand
Honestly from my point of view it isn't about finding who is creating the best tactic, but finding the tactic. I'm always happy when someone score +2 points from current best tactic and it doesn't matter if the outscored one was mine, i can't see it as a competition, we're just working together trying to improve more and more. By the way when i take some ideas from someone else i always try to mention him, as you can see in some of my tactic, obviously i can't do it everytime, sometimes i upload 10+ tweaks of the same tactic and i think it would be useless mention everyone whose ideas i saw in every tactic ahah As you can see in my threads, i took inspiration from @CBP87 and @A Smile ideas
bwig said: No offense to the creator, but to me, this is no new tactic. Especially not the new no1 Listing. If it provided any better results it would work for me. But one thing changed to no1 with no effect at all shouldn´t even be listed in my honest opinion. @FM Arena Expand
Hi, dont'worry ahah, i just applied CF(S) + IF(A) from A Smile's tactic to previous versions of 424 Classic, with FBs, TakeMoreRisks on AF, etc... By the way i'm just trying to find out the best possible tactic, and by now 424 looks most promising way, so tweaking small PI/TIs is the only thing i can think to discover something better, i decided to invest my two daily uploads to explore this path, and it's normal that with the 9600 games accuracy some tactics show same results, but how can we know it before testing them?
Thanks you very much guys.
First reply to the post
I took a lot to convince myself, but i noticed that sticking to Balanced mentality is almost always the best choice, so trust it even if you're losing/winning. I often use "Demand More" also when i'm winning to close out it when i'm afraid of an opponent comeback, but i know that often it happens anyways, the only advice i can give is to anticipate subs, especially FBs and DMs in order to have more freshness in defensive roles, but i think that this isn't about the tactic, but more about shouts/pep talks
If it can help you, these are examples of players i use for AF (Corsini) and CF (Meyer). As you can see Meyer is way more "complete", instead Corsini has attributes more focused on Pace,Acceleration,Dribbling and Jumping Reach, which are the more effective ones for offensive roles.
Meyer has instead these but also good Passing, Vision and Balance, that i think are very important to collect the ball and deliver it to IFs or AF effectively.
Hope it could help!
I'd say: put your best finisher as AF and your "offensive regista" as CF, the idea is that your CF will lye between attack and midfield and will often drops to collect the ball, so it should have good passing attributes moreover pace/shooting like a normal striker. It isn't so easy to find a good CF (at least, it wasn't in my careers) but you have to think it like a false 9 merged with a finisher
From DataHub i noticed many errors in the beginning of the possession phase, i tried to reduce these errors with simpler options for GK and defenders
Tackle Harder on everyone (also GK)
Dribble More on BPDs
CrosseFromByline and TakeMoreRisks on FBs
Honestly from my point of view it isn't about finding who is creating the best tactic, but finding the tactic. I'm always happy when someone score +2 points from current best tactic and it doesn't matter if the outscored one was mine, i can't see it as a competition, we're just working together trying to improve more and more. By the way when i take some ideas from someone else i always try to mention him, as you can see in some of my tactic, obviously i can't do it everytime, sometimes i upload 10+ tweaks of the same tactic and i think it would be useless mention everyone whose ideas i saw in every tactic ahah
As you can see in my threads, i took inspiration from @CBP87 and @A Smile ideas
Removing TakeMoreRisks from AF
Hi, dont'worry ahah, i just applied CF(S) + IF(A) from A Smile's tactic to previous versions of 424 Classic, with FBs, TakeMoreRisks on AF, etc... By the way i'm just trying to find out the best possible tactic, and by now 424 looks most promising way, so tweaking small PI/TIs is the only thing i can think to discover something better, i decided to invest my two daily uploads to explore this path, and it's normal that with the 9600 games accuracy some tactics show same results, but how can we know it before testing them?