DreadPirateRoberts said: If you look at the result of -5 decisions test which was also run today, you will see that there is an effect going from 10 to 5 , however going from 10 to 15 doesn't do a single thing, that means there is in fact a point in which attributes start to give diminishing returns, the results are right in front of you Expand
The results indicate that by adding +5 that the result increased by 21 points, how is that diminishing results? Diminishing results is making large changes for little gain however I would say the result of 81 points, increase of 21 points is a big gain in comparison to say work rate which only gained 1 point
Stuaret said: Interesting, by adding 5 pace points we gained 21 points, while by subtracting 5 pace points we lost 31 points. Does this mean that there is a diminishing return when increasing the value of an attribute? Have any studies ever been done on this? Expand
I don't know if I've read your question right but there isn't a diminishing return when increasing the value of the pace attribute. This test proved that pace is OP and the higher the value the better
To be honest I'm surprised it's not been raised for testing before, but same with the PI tests I just want to see if the instructions that can be mirrored have the same results as the main tactic
The results indicate that by adding +5 that the result increased by 21 points, how is that diminishing results? Diminishing results is making large changes for little gain however I would say the result of 81 points, increase of 21 points is a big gain in comparison to say work rate which only gained 1 point
I don't know if I've read your question right but there isn't a diminishing return when increasing the value of the pace attribute. This test proved that pace is OP and the higher the value the better
???
Changes -
Mirrored formation roles, e.g left inside forward moved to SS
Changed focus play down left to focus down right
Changed overlap right to overlap left
Made some changes to this years version though, WBs to WBa, DMd to DMs and CMa to DLPs
Changes -
Removed all PIs where applicable but left in PIs relating to when player has ball e.g Take more risks
42
I can't I'm afraid what is it you want to know?
Changes -
Removed all PIs where applicable leaving just the Opposition has ball PIs in place, e.g tackle harder
Changes -
Removed all PIs except PIs related to role width ee.g sit narrower
Changes -
Removed all PIs where applicable to all positions
Changes -
AMa to SS
Changes -
Middle AF to AMa
Added take more risks, dribble more, shoot less often and tackle harder to AM
I assume he's predicting a score of 70 when tested