If SI thinks that Acc and Pace should be the most important attributes then ok, I can live with that.
If SI don't want to tell us that because they want we found out it by ourselves then it's also fine by me.
BUT FOR GOD SAKE... I just don't understand if they don't want to help us then can we at least expect that they won't try to confuse us by putting something like the highlighted attributes?
As you can see the test result of the OIs isn't great and @Delicious himself says that he isn't 100% sure about the OIs because he's still testing them and trying things...
opq said: Tbh I’d take just like that: guys it’s no need to play only with this tactic. Look, you can change this and that and result is +- the same if just this approach suits more to you. And yeah, sometimes it makes a tactic really better, and sometimes much worse xD Expand
Anyway at the end all roads lead to one point and that point is the quality of your players.
If your team is like PSG and you play in a less competitive league such as French League then I bet you can easily win the league even using a tactic that got less than 30 points in the testing.
Something on the lines of 'the set pieces could be improved, check out this link' may have been a little more helpful, my tactics are scoring low? would say 50 is pretty decent Expand
Sorry if I offended you, I really didn't mean.
For a wide diamond formation with DWs and IWBs 48-50 pts is a really low score... but it's only my opinion, feel free to disagree
If SI don't want to tell us that because they want we found out it by ourselves then it's also fine by me.
BUT FOR GOD SAKE... I just don't understand if they don't want to help us then can we at least expect that they won't try to confuse us by putting something like the highlighted attributes?
UNBELIEVABLY poor game design
Erling Haaland scored 101 goals
Ruben Dias 48 goals from corners
I think it was about 40 or 50 goals
The team won the title with 109 pts and had only 1 draw and 1 lose during the season.
I'm really impressed.
Unforutanlty, I couldn't keep Victor Osimhen. Chelsea stole him from me.
Nah, that's wrong thinking
The OIs that @Delicious suggest using - https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/20729/
The test result of the OIs - https://fm-arena.com/thread/4534-424-extreme-volts-iv-opposition-instructions/
As you can see the test result of the OIs isn't great and @Delicious himself says that he isn't 100% sure about the OIs because he's still testing them and trying things...
I don't think so because it didn't hit the 1st spot.
I think people who like playing with 3 strikers are just happy.
Anyway at the end all roads lead to one point and that point is the quality of your players.
If your team is like PSG and you play in a less competitive league such as French League then I bet you can easily win the league even using a tactic that got less than 30 points in the testing.
Ok
I'm not a native English speaker so I don't understand what you mean.
Something on the lines of 'the set pieces could be improved, check out this link' may have been a little more helpful, my tactics are scoring low? would say 50 is pretty decent
Sorry if I offended you, I really didn't mean.
For a wide diamond formation with DWs and IWBs 48-50 pts is a really low score... but it's only my opinion, feel free to disagree
Your tactics use Long Throw-ins but they are terrible in FM23, no one uses them.
Dude, your set pieces are terrible that's why your tactics have been getting such low scores
https://fm-arena.com/thread/3100-reliable-set-pieces-fm23/