Wardie37 said: I've noticed particularly after the latest update a lot of 65% possession and 48 shots to their 1 coming away with losses and draws. Do you have any tips on how to avoid this or changes shouts during a match where this is happening? Or is it down to the good old getting FM'd randomness? Expand
It happens from time to time, it's just the nature of FM, you really can't do anything about it.
ta2199 said: I think Injury Prone also depend on the position the player is playing. Personally I feel that Winger get injured more. Expand
Injury Proneness is an attribute that increase the probability of getting injured.
It makes sense that wingers get injured quite more often compared to other positions because they do much more sprints and get tackled more often than any other positions.
Thanks for a great and well explained tactic. But vs Big teams (man city, liverpool etc) I'm really struggling to not concede 3-4 goals. I'm playing as Petersborough and last season I ended up in 5th place in premier division. Expand
Flunshexmex said: Hey guys! could someone explain to me: I play for Leeds, I started using zaz-blue 3.2, but this tactic is more designed for strikers, but the strongest players in my team are wingers (Harrison, Raphinha)and the role of DW does not effective for them. What role can I set my winger in this tactic for maximum effectiveness? Expand
Ignore the role suitability because it means nothing
if they can play on DL/R positions then use "ZaZ - Blue 3.2" tactic and if they can only play on AML/R positions then use "ZaZ - Blue 3.2 AW" tactic
nator said: It will not get tested never or it will be after others? I think i have change the only bad things the other had and made the perfect one thats why i upload it Expand
Cheekyhalfling said: What would you believe are the key positions for best players, say you had an average team and money to sign 2 or 3 star players, what positions would you think would be best? Expand
CBP87 said: Not so sure about that pal, I mean I've tested it with multiple teams and it did better than pre season prediction, with the likes of Villa and PSG they have very strong wide players but it still did very well. I suppose its personal preference, I'm using this in one of my saves and I sold all the wide players and brought in work horses for the midfield roles (Bissouma is fantastic by the way). Messi mostly played as the right sided Mez in the PSG save Expand
No doubts, it's a great tactic and you'll do better that the prediction with any team.
I just tell my experience. I would bother with an "exotic" formation only if it promises a head above result than any other tactics and I think most people also think that way. I really wanted to try this tactic but it's was hard to find a team that fits it. I found few teams that somehow fits it, I mean they had enough central midfielders but even that the central midfielders were a way worse than the wingers or inside forwards. Also, it's obvious that speed matters a lot in FM but there're very few fast central midfielders in the game.
Once more, it's a great tactic, unfortunately, the formation is a bit exotic.
But unfortunately, it's very hard to find a team that fits this formation. Most team have Inside Forwards and Wingers and they don't have enough central midfielders, especially, very quality central midfielders so I doubt it'll be very popular
Belmorn said: @Sandro thank you for that link , team cohesion not being editable / freezeable can definitely contribute to slightly off expected results , as well as the obvious rng is rng or better said on a forum like this : fm is fm. Expand
Obviously, Team Cohesion has some influence but I don't think it's responsible for the results' variation we see in the test league. If you remove all the RNG factors from the game then it still will be that random because the game is that random and you can't do anything about it, you can just slight reduce the RNG by eliminating as many as possible random factors but still it'll quite random because the developers from SI want the game to be like that.
Belmorn said: Once again I think you are doing awesome work. Do you have any idea what’s causing quite some fluctuation between the same tests ? Take Tika taka for example , in a test their b team is almost relegated while in the test after it , it’s 2nd after team A. Given that all circumstances are equal , I don’t expect quite such a large difference in results ( 50 points ? ) I’m not a data analyst person so I don’t really have an answer to this. Expand
I guess you need to post screenshots of the tactic and your own result with it.
It happens from time to time, it's just the nature of FM, you really can't do anything about it.
Injury Proneness is an attribute that increase the probability of getting injured.
It makes sense that wingers get injured quite more often compared to other positions because they do much more sprints and get tackled more often than any other positions.
I find the following hidden attributes are the most important:
- Professionalism
- Consistency
- Injury Proneness
"Professionalism" is how well a player develops and it determines his attitude and reactions on different events.
"Consistency" is how frequently a player plays at 100% of his ability.
"Injury Proneness" is how often a player gets injured.
Yes, ZaZ changed the set pieces.
Thanks for a great and well explained tactic. But vs Big teams (man city, liverpool etc) I'm really struggling to not concede 3-4 goals. I'm playing as Petersborough and last season I ended up in 5th place in premier division.
https://fm-arena.com/thread/1076-my-tactic-doesn-t-work-help-me-please/
Ignore the role suitability because it means nothing
if they can play on DL/R positions then use "ZaZ - Blue 3.2" tactic and if they can only play on AML/R positions then use "ZaZ - Blue 3.2 AW" tactic
I played with Bayern Munich and had only 1 lose in the league and the team scored 127 and conceded only 21.
Champions Cup Final vs Liverpool
I'm sure what he said means "never"
https://fm-arena.com/thread/2276-changes-in-the-representation-of-the-tests-results/
Probably, the wingers or the central defenders.
I concede twice less on Positive than on Very Attacking.
It's going strong!
No doubts, it's a great tactic and you'll do better that the prediction with any team.
I just tell my experience. I would bother with an "exotic" formation only if it promises a head above result than any other tactics and I think most people also think that way. I really wanted to try this tactic but it's was hard to find a team that fits it. I found few teams that somehow fits it, I mean they had enough central midfielders but even that the central midfielders were a way worse than the wingers or inside forwards. Also, it's obvious that speed matters a lot in FM but there're very few fast central midfielders in the game.
Once more, it's a great tactic, unfortunately, the formation is a bit exotic.
Nice score!
But unfortunately, it's very hard to find a team that fits this formation. Most team have Inside Forwards and Wingers and they don't have enough central midfielders, especially, very quality central midfielders so I doubt it'll be very popular
Obviously, Team Cohesion has some influence but I don't think it's responsible for the results' variation we see in the test league. If you remove all the RNG factors from the game then it still will be that random because the game is that random and you can't do anything about it, you can just slight reduce the RNG by eliminating as many as possible random factors but still it'll quite random because the developers from SI want the game to be like that.
Do you have any idea what’s causing quite some fluctuation between the same tests ?
Take Tika taka for example , in a test their b team is almost relegated while in the test after it , it’s 2nd after team A.
Given that all circumstances are equal , I don’t expect quite such a large difference in results ( 50 points ? )
I’m not a data analyst person so I don’t really have an answer to this.
Look at this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/442-my-attempt-to-measure-the-game-rng-random-number-generator/