opq said: I’ve got 3pts more on mistakenly uploaded twice tactic. And both runs there were 1920 games being played. So I wouldn’t seriously take +-1-2pts as a straight result of little tweaks to initial tactic Expand
@Delicious Did u tried whipped or mixed crosses on Poirer? Is cosmectic too or just useless? I dont know why ppl has this sexual appeal by low crosses. In my brain whipped crosses makes much more sense in this context.
BUT I also think that for some shapes the Defensive Line still might have a small effect because as @crizeKOS said "Higher Defensive Line" improved the result of XMAS_twkd3 but the improvement was a quite small it could be just the RNG Expand
it was tested as the only variable changed on XMAS_twkd3... it dropped 2 points on her
Zippo said: I've merged the results of both tests into one.
My congratulations, this tactic has been officially tested for 3,840 matches.
If you value the result of our testing more than the result of your testing then you should based your idea on the result of our testing. I think it's simple as that.
There are about 1,000,000,000 different tactical combinations in the game so it would take ages to test them all.
So that's why we greatly value any tactician:
- who spends his time to analyze the result of our testing - who finds the patters in the result of our testing to further improve the results - who doesn't propose for the testing tactical approaches that have been already tested very well
crizeKOS said: @Zippo there is any metric you would suggest us to take a look when making our test in these holiday premier league tests? Coz i had low score tactics grabbing everything and I had good ones doing ok. U guys asks this how it was some kind of pattern but it gets more crearly that is not that worth it and doesnt proofs much. Mainly coz the readons u r always mentioning... Expand
@Zippo Im asking this because my fear is that we may endind like @Delicious micro testing stuff everywhere and maybe getting mad.
@Zippo there is any metric you would suggest us to take a look when making our test in these holiday premier league tests? Coz i had low score tactics grabbing everything and I had good ones doing ok. U guys asks this how it was some kind of pattern but it gets more crearly that is not that worth it and doesnt proofs much. Mainly coz the reasons u r always mentioning...
crizeKOS said: In his log in the main post he said he made this one with overlaps instead of underlaps. I was confused because the picture in this post over here. I guess he needs to upload the right tactic img. Expand
So, despite RNG, OVERLAPS gave 0.2774 more points then.
Zippo said: I think @Delicious accidently uploaded the same tactic twice or maybe there's some difference in the PIs, I don't know I haven't checked it.
In his log in the main post he said he made this one with overlaps instead of underlaps. I was confused because the picture in this post over here. I guess he needs to upload the right tactic img.
This one has underlaps or overlaps? Fix it please, coz is leading ppl to think that underlaps with focus play on flanks is better. The tactics name diference is just an "A" @Zippo@Droid
We cant allow that, the heresy. In an inquisition act I've changed only the focus play that is on it's LiciousXMAS (now is focus play through the middle). May we rest certain that we need keep our good faith on the Dark Lord.
Yeah, so probably I got lucky with XMAS then.
BUT I also think that for some shapes the Defensive Line still might have a small effect because as @crizeKOS said "Higher Defensive Line" improved the result of XMAS_twkd3 but the improvement was a quite small it could be just the RNG
it was tested as the only variable changed on XMAS_twkd3... it dropped 2 points on her
well it debuffed xmas, may the amount u players that u have upfront matters... or is just RNG
@Delicious You rock dude! Gj!!!!
Base Tactic: It's XMAS_twkd3 - https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/16759/
Changes made to the base tactic:
- run at defence removed
- be expressive added
Im so stupid sometimes, how I didnt come with this one b4? Please someone kill me
Spoiler
Base tactic: frisk424
Changes made to the base tactic:
- Run at defense added
I want to check if there ll be any impact on this instruction on my tactic
i ll put this on my list, thanks:
- 352
- 334
- 523
- 532
- 541
- 5122
- 5212
- 5221
- 3331
- 4222
- 41212
- 4411
- JUSTICE HAMMER
XMAS cant be upgraded I fear
My congratulations, this tactic has been officially tested for 3,840 matches.
If you value the result of our testing more than the result of your testing then you should based your idea on the result of our testing. I think it's simple as that.
There are about 1,000,000,000 different tactical combinations in the game so it would take ages to test them all.
So that's why we greatly value any tactician:
- who spends his time to analyze the result of our testing
- who finds the patters in the result of our testing to further improve the results
- who doesn't propose for the testing tactical approaches that have been already tested very well
Are you that kind of tactician? Then we need you!
@Delicious did u see that? he said he love us
@Zippo Im asking this because my fear is that we may endind like @Delicious micro testing stuff everywhere and maybe getting mad.
You can download both tactics and check the TIs yourself.
I was asking coz Im not home atm. I have only the image picture as source.
So, despite RNG, OVERLAPS gave 0.2774 more points then.
https://fm-arena.com/tactic/3825-433-whisper-in-the-wind/
In his log in the main post he said he made this one with overlaps instead of underlaps. I was confused because the picture in this post over here. I guess he needs to upload the right tactic img.
We cant allow that, the heresy. In an inquisition act I've changed only the focus play that is on it's LiciousXMAS (now is focus play through the middle). May we rest certain that we need keep our good faith on the Dark Lord.
Ty
Spoiler
it's LiciousXMAS v3 - https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/17719/