dzek
Well done @A Smile!

Did you try to change IFs to IWs and keep the three AMs?
ZaZ said: Many times, but sometimes a team instruction that was previously tested can give good results when paired with other set of instructions, positions or player roles.

And do you think these team instructions are the best combination at the moment? The formation is undoubtedly one of the best for this year's game. Also, there may be no better combination of player roles. What interests me is to examine several combinations of team instructions to arrive at the best possible one. I realize that there are many combinations and it is impossible to check them all, but we have a good basis for conducting some logical tests.
@ZaZ have you experiment with different team instructions?
@ZaZ PWBs behave like CWBs?
Germaniac said: Yes, it's here. I'll request a retest.
Hope it goes well :)
@Germaniac did you also test it with IWs on both flanks?
jamzee said: whats the difference between the rest?

3 Goal Threats roles and rest creative threats
Rob said: Hey...will this league or similar be made for FM26. It had great benefit of using it on FM24. Hats off for the excellent work back then. I've tried to load the file in on FM26 but gets a problem with activating the different managers
Hi Rob,

I haven't played the game yet, nor have I bought it. I'm following the news around the game and I see that most people don't like it. If I buy it in the future, then maybe I'll try to make something similar.

Thank you very much for your kind words and I'm glad it helped you on FM24. :)
PERFECT STRANGERS 42112 WIWBA P107 EF (WB)

Changes:
- FB(At) to WB(At)

brainbox said: Do you happen to have a test league where every team is completely equal? Or would it best easy to edit this one to do that. As I want to test things like different attribute changes compared to other teams and PPMs.

All positions have the same attributes in all teams inside the league. If you mean every player to have equals attributes with any player of the league without consider the player’s position then no. I keep that logic on my league. You still have the opportunity to change things with the help of FMRTE tool.

Thanks 😉
Zebryn said: Where to find the weight from the game? and is this spreadsheet still valid?
Hello,

You don't have to find anything on your own. Just download my files and use them as I said in the first post. I think they are valid, but right now there are more effective ways to evaluate your players/staff.

I can't help you further at this time because I'm away from the game for a long time and I don't make changes/updates to my files anymore.

:)
SalientSalmorejo said: Could someone please explain how to use the excel sheet? There are currently 11 human-controlled teams and 15 tables.
Hi @SalientSalmorejo,

After you finished with a run of the Test League you just copy GF, GA and PTS of your teams. Follow these steps at least for 3 times (1st table, 2nd table and then 3rd table - from left to right). Your results will be shown on the 4th table in the right side.
Gerrard said: MU TEST
I mean if you have time to create more variations with different PIs on this formation maybe it gets more points than 63.
@Gerrard this should be a tactic that needs more testings. It produces some good results according @Gianaa9 HoF tactic too. If you can, experiment a little bit more on this :goofy:
chanho said: @dzek your advice
Not exactly. I suggested something different from this. Its not tested by anyone yet what I'm suggesting.
https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/40188/
Hi @chanho, if you can, try the opposite of that and use these:
• STCR -> PF - Su
• AML -> ML (W - Su)
• MR -> AMR (IF - At)
• DMCR -> DM - Su
• DL -> IWB - Su
• DR -> FB - At
@A Smile maybe this one with both of IF on attack duty?
@Gianaa9, did you try this formation with AM(At) instead of SS(At)?
Removed Underlaps
SK(De) to SK(Su)
PF(At) to PF(Su)

While I agree that we can't measure GKs for whether the "Tackle Harder" PI affects them, it doesn't seem to actually do anything. I wonder why SI added this PI to the GKs.

@mmigueis, you can find those tests here.

EDIT: In the meantime I have also looked at the 'Take More Risks' PI (with and without) and I have not found anything that should be announced.