I suggest when these tests finish, to start a tactical testing of the best tactic to polish it even more. For example remove or/and add some TIs. What do you say?
opq said: It doesn't work sadly. And with cautious there are too much gaps between forwards and others, they stay pretty high on the pitch even on defensive duty. Expand
Something I want to point out here is that in the testing league this tactic comes up against with only three tactics and with relatively defined team instructions for AI Teams/Managers.
I agree with everything you have written. Well done!
filipss said: Is it bad if the wingers are not left footed for left side and right footed for right side? Expand
If you use opposite footed player in winger positions, wingers/defensive wingers will act like an inverted winger with ball because they tend to use their preferred foot more often so they will try to cut inside with ball but from wider positions than a normal inverter winger/inside forward. Winger and defensive winger in general tends to stay wider.
pixar said: I feel that if we gathered this kind of pill information about match engine coding under one title, we could get closer to the perfect tactic. Expand
Better yet, we should invite a SI developer here on the forum to explain it all to us in details.
@Zippo, did you change anything on FM-Arena Testing League since you gave us that savegame? If yes, can we have a newly savegame file? It will be very helpful
Did you run the test on holiday? If yes it will be difficult to understand if it works like that or the other way. I'm doing also many tests with different shapes and especially with different playing styles. Keep going man!
Geek said: Please, no need to confuse people saying that SI has confirmed anything when they don't. Expand I'm 100% sure about it. It will be very helpful if you test it yourself and if you find anything different, it will be nice to share it with us.
Delicious said: But that's 100% sure? I've saw this video 2 days ago, but how the hell is working then ?_?! Thanks to you now i want to test do early crosses... Expand He is moderator in SI official forum named "Rashidi". Everything he drops out it's confirmed by SI, at least the most out of them. You can test it by your own. I just try to help.
@Delicious, as SI has confirmed, "Take More Risk" is more about the decision that the individual player makes about how risky his moves and passes will be. So given that, we could add this PI(at least to the strikers) to improve "Pass Into Space" even more, of course with the downside of passing the ball unnecessarily forward if you don't have the right players to do so.
Changes: Team Instructions: - Removed: IN POSSESSION: Shorter Passing IN TRANSITION: Distribute To Centre-Backs - Added: IN POSSESSION: Underlaps IN TRANSITION: Distribute To Full-Backs
Lapidus said: Removing Take More Risks across all position won't make any difference because there's "Pass Into Space" TI that automatically turns on Take More Risks PI for all positions. Expand
You can check here the differences between "Pass Into Space" and "Take More Risks".
And with cautious there are too much gaps between forwards and others, they stay pretty high on the pitch even on defensive duty.
Try it with mid block.
I agree with everything you have written. Well done!
If you use opposite footed player in winger positions, wingers/defensive wingers will act like an inverted winger with ball because they tend to use their preferred foot more often so they will try to cut inside with ball but from wider positions than a normal inverter winger/inside forward. Winger and defensive winger in general tends to stay wider.
Better yet, we should invite a SI developer here on the forum to explain it all to us in details.
I'm 100% sure about it. It will be very helpful if you test it yourself and if you find anything different, it will be nice to share it with us.
Thanks to you now i want to test do early crosses...
He is moderator in SI official forum named "Rashidi". Everything he drops out it's confirmed by SI, at least the most out of them. You can test it by your own. I just try to help.
Changes:
- WB(Su) -> IWB(Su)
- Tweaks on player instructions for IW position.
Changes:
Team Instructions:
- Removed:
IN POSSESSION: Shorter Passing
IN TRANSITION: Distribute To Centre-Backs
- Added:
IN POSSESSION: Underlaps
IN TRANSITION: Distribute To Full-Backs
Roles and Duties:
- DW(Su) -> IW(Su)
- DLP(Su) -> DM(De)
- IWB(Su) -> WB(Su)
- SK(De) -> SK(Su)
Player Instructions:
- Improvements to all player positions.
You can check here the differences between "Pass Into Space" and "Take More Risks".
Changes:
IW(Su) to W(s) - customized PIs
Changes:
Dropped back WBRL(WBs) to DRL(IWBs).
W(At) to IW(Su).
Changed PIs to all positions and TIs.
I had only 2 loses in the season.
Did you test it on holidays or as a normal run?