ZaZ
Thank you for testing!
CreeZ said: Firstly, thank you for your comment! as I am kind of testing blue 4.0, if I have to rate my squad`s rate out of 100, I can say about 75, and almost all equal teams are defeated by me. Also, I can say better teams like 85+ overalls almost equalized all the games with blue 4.0. On the other hand, Fire 1.0 was unfortunately sad experience for me. I lost almost half of the games, maybe because my squad and player quality were not able to follow up all the tactics and pressing.

The form analysis says always the same things as;

Is there any recommendation for negative form analysis? Thank you!


Those negative analysis can be very deceiving. For example, few touches to shot can just mean the opponent can't pass the ball very well close to your box, so they need to reach the goal with direct passes instead. It's not exactly a negative. The other about 107 entries by the middle is also a bit deceiving, as it's just slightly above 1/3 of the occasions (which can only happen from three directions).

Anyway, the strong of Fire is the attack, not the defense, so it will always have negatives in the defensive department.
CreeZ said: I have just signed-up to the website to reply this post. ZaZ you are a wonderful guy bro with all the tactics, I used your blue 4.0 all fm22 seasons and carriers, although I scored 100+ goals every season with blue 4.0 on FM22, I couldn`t score and win any game with fire 1.0 on FM23. I loaded blue 4.0 from FM22 save as tactics, and my team started score again and now I win most of the games. I play the team in real life also similar to your tactics but a smaller team than premier league teams.
I just wanted to let you know. Thank you for your all help to us.


Fire 1.0 is just Blue 4.0 with Drop Off More and Higher Defensive Line. Results shouldn't be much different, but I will test again to see if it is actually better or worse. Keep in mind that the game was released less than 24h ago, so I didn't have time to test much.

@Zippo, do you plan to test the top tactics of last year, or I should post Blue 4.0 for it to be tested?
nicolae said: it seems to me that the attackers are no longer scoring

I just ran a holiday test here and got 170 goals with Manchester City. They still seem to be scoring.
sheso182 said: Amazing work as always ZaZ.

Thank you!
McDonalds said: 23.1version result is totally different,maybe you should test again:shock:

There was no change to the match engine. What you are feeling is just random deviation.
I can't find FM23 pre-game editor in steam. I click tools, it shows editor from all previous editions, except FM23. Anyone having the same issue?
P.S.: Nevermind, it's a bug that is fixed restarting Steam.
vankosi said:

the first half of the season

prediction 17 and i am first


Thank you for testing, and good luck in your season!
Belladonna said: My results using Fire 0.3 so far after training the tactic preseason, I did move SS to MC At as my best midfielders play there and i feel it provides more cover in central midfield, I'm Airbus in Wales second season predicted 6th

I do make the odd tactical change during the match if its not going well ie take off roll it out or play out of defence.
I'm really enjoying the tactic and the games are pretty crazy, i feel so far in the beta there are quite a few defensive errors and long balls over the top are a bit op so attack is definitely the best form of defense. I have been using Fire 1.0 light recently to shut out games if winning and it still scores goals, so far so good.
Thanks Zaz ;)


Thank you for testing! Glad it's working for you.
Tejash said: Which one is the best you feel or good in defence?

I'm not committing to anything yet, I'm just testing to see which is the best one. I want to set two tactics as a focus for FM23, one for attack and one for defense, and find a way to change in between easily.

P.S.: Remember that FM was not even released yet. There are some good tactics for defense that were tested by other people, like this one here.
Tejash said: @ZaZ What is the difference between water and fire and the rest?

They are all different formations.
Falbravv said: Here is some tests with Low FIRE.
Not impressed to be honest, however results are good for Europa teams, but i will run the same test with FIRE 1.0 which is for me clearly the best, with Cautious mentality.





Thank you for testing! In my experiments, it is as good as Fire, but not much change defensively. That's why I moved to other formations for now.
Chewbacca said: @ZaZ, what does "Low" mean in the tactic names?

Wingers in MLR position, like the difference between Blue and Blue Legacy. People have been complaining of Blue being leaky since the first day, and that is one of the alternatives to get better defense, for a variation to use during matches.

P.S.: I pick W instead of DW because you can change to Ease Off Tackles, which helps against cards, or for a light variation to save energy.
Tejash said: @ZaZ Can you pleas share your new work? Would love to test it!!

Those are the three formations I'm testing for a more defensive tactic. Feel free if anyone wants to help testing them.

P.S.: I'm also trying some variation with Frost (based on Green), but I didn't manage to get it right yet.

P.S.2: Added Water, the one I'm currently testing right now.
ZaZ - Low Water 1.0.fmf
Downloaded : 200 times
Uploaded : Nov 7, 2022
ZaZ - Low Shock 1.0.fmf
Downloaded : 180 times
Uploaded : Nov 7, 2022
ZaZ - Low Fire 1.0.fmf
Downloaded : 189 times
Uploaded : Nov 7, 2022
ZaZ - Low Acid 1.0.fmf
Downloaded : 290 times
Uploaded : Nov 7, 2022
Petrades said: I can confirm that is also works with small clubs. I just put one AF as a midfielder. Media prediction is 15.

I have been testing a number of different shapes to improve defense, like moving one striker to CM, or moving wingers to MLR position. I'm still testing to see what option is the best, and it will probably only be finished after the end of Beta.
Tejash said: @ZaZ  What's the upgrade? Anything interesting??

Still testing if it's better or worse.
Mark said: Group 12 Update



A small movement of a handful of points and Roll the Dice moves down the list. I still think a very stable tactic and so far has the best defence. Interestingly Fire 0.2 moved fractionally in front of Fire 0.3. A mere 2.6 points between the top 10 tactics. All these are definitely worthy of playing in your game. Onto the final Group. It will probably be tomorrow before I finish it.


If it wasn't so close to the new version, I would send you my newer Fire upgrade to test.
MarcoL said: Sorry for the (silly ?) question. Are Fire 1.0 and Fire 1.0 light in this thread diferent? Thanks

Light is a variant to rest players and avoid cards. It is the same as Fire, but all players have Ease Off Tackles, mentality is Cautious, goalkeeper is set to Slow Pace Down, and players are instructed to Stay On Feet.
Tejash said: Somehow keep losing and leaking goals with fire 0.3 and lose simple home games with Arsenal against lower sides. Wonder why it doesn't work for my Arsenal team

Fire has a good win rate on average, meaning by the end of the season, it will allow you to overachieve. That doesn't mean you will win all matches, and it doesn't mean you can't lose 4x0 against a team from a lower division.

However, keep in mind that the right way to play FM is not to just plug a tactic and use it in any situation. You need different tactics for different moments of the match, and for different moments of the championship. Last year, I suggested alternating between Blue and Green, one for attack and another for defense. However, I just started testing with defensive tactic, but I also decided to wait until launch to resume tests since anything becomes invalid after the match engine changes.

In short, I don't have a sort of oracle that gives the perfect tactic, and it takes time to find out how things work in FM23, and to create a good tactic based on that knowledge.
Gabachinho said: Hi!

Goode job Mark:thup:


Can you tell me where i can find "Roll the Dice" tactic please?


https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/14881/