ZaZ
saitjerome said: Is "much shorter passing" viable?

In short, it lowers the performance. Why would you want to have much shorter passing?
Keshk said: @ZaZ  Can u upload ur training schedule files (pre-1-2) pls :love:

https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/12345/
It's 2031, so it's hard to judge. If you played Fulham from first season, then your team is probably way stronger than the rest.
To be fair, youth setup is more useful in real life than in FM. If you play ten seasons, you will get at most two or three players that are worth using. Meanwhile, you can get very good youth players from other team and use them instead, possibly for a cheaper price than you pay to keep a state of the art youth setup running.

P.S.: Just to be clear, it's very useful to have good training facilities to develop the players in your main squad, I just never saw much benefit in youth setup (youth facilities, coaching, recruitment and youth level). Unlike real life, FM doesn't have strong competition for young talents, so it's not so hard to hire the best from other teams.
kjordafen said: Of course not, just weird that so many using narrow and strikerless tactics when most of the top tactics uses strikers and wingers :)

If I post videos of how I became champion of Premier League playing with Blue or any other top tactic, people will say "Great thing, even a monkey can do that in vacation mode". However, If I post a video showing how I won everything with a novel goalkeeperless tactic, then everyone will watch it. Youtube is about entertaining, not about showing the best tactics.
kjordafen said: Seen a lot of streamers and friends using narrow tactics lately and performing well. But this keep being a top tactic. Have you tested something of a strikerless and/or narrow tactic?

It's not like the top tactics will start performing worse just because some people started playing narrow or strikerless. Anyway, new tactics are tested every day, you can just check the tactic testing log.
Grimlock said: Do you think Libero would work better in the middle than regular defenders roles?

Yes, Libero worked better in all my experiments with 3 defenders.

P.S.: Yellow didn't go very well, so people should use this tactic instead:
https://fm-arena.com/tactic/2741-abc-3-4-2-1/
Nikko said: How is it going? Any results yet? :)

Just added. It's probably not gonna be anything special, I would be happy if it reached close to 6.0. However, there's this tactic that already got tested and is probably better.
Solaris said: Hi,

Could you post screenshots of the tactic and result? Thanks in advance.


Sure. I still have to run it to get results. I didn't save them since I wasn't going to post the tactic.
@valerienismael, I have uploaded Yellow 3.0, as you requested.
G1102 said: So i promoted to the PL back to back using ZaZ 4.0 .
This is where things became difficult.
I tried using the same tactic but the results were dreadful. First 13 matches i started to think i'm going to get relegated.
But then i made the switch tot ZaZ 4.0 Solid and just started to spam NO Pressure and praise after goals and that did the trick.
Results started to look good again.
It seems that first season in the PL you can't go employ a positive mindset tactic.
I regret not making the change sooner as i would have probably be in the running for european places.
The loses and draw in the club form are against livepool both home and away and a draw against man utd at home. Last two wins against leichester and tottenham away.


It might also just be that you had a bad spell of games, by random factors that you couldn't control. Sometimes it happens and it can last several games. Anyway, good that you manage to hold on Premier!
Koopa said: is your ss version better than the cm version? sorry for the dumb questions, i'm new to the game

No. CM is better. If you are unsure, use the version from @Geek that was tested here and did very well.
LUDEN said: So I can't test my tactics? Shall we post more results from testing with other teams?

I didn't say that, I just reassured that the tactic will probably do well.
LUDEN said: mancity 134goal

That formation and roles work quite well, I tested it before.
Koopa said: ironically, i've had a lot of trouble with that tactic, are the CMs supposed to be world class attackers? cos i have an easier time scoring with blue

That tactic is more solid, meaning better defense. Blue is better at attacking.
Koopa said: is the tactic suited for underdog teams? ive had some good results with it in my first year in the prem (managing Blackburn), but it feels like my players have regressed and i'm giving up a ton of goals to big teams

It does work well for underdogs, but if you want a more solid tactic, try this one or Green 5.0.
Sane said: @ZaZ  how important is it for the player to have the same traits as the role? Will it greatly affect the win in the match?

That's very hard to measure. What I know is that opposite traits and instructions harm performance, but I can't say how much it improves if you use the correct traits. Personally, I don't bother about player traits at all.
Too similar to this, so it probably won't get tested.
ZaZ Blue DM FM 22 said: good

Thanks, but that kind of nickname should probably be changed so it doesn't cause confusion. @Zippo
Koopa said: I'd like to second a request for a guide to genie scout ratings. Is it the percentages that we look at? E.g. after loading the grf file, it says one of my players has a rating of 67% in the AMC role, is that the only number to look at? I assume that's the weighted rating cos I couldn't find any other numbers

https://www.fmscout.com/a-genie-scout-guide.html