TheSpambotGuy said: Do you switch to 'Play for Set Pieces' in games, or you never change the tactics? Expand
Hey, it depends on the size of my squad to be honest, if I have short arses then no, I also won't play invite crosses, but If I have quite a tall team and the oppisition is vulnerable to the odd set piece then Ill add it, I also look out for the assitant manager pre game telling me to do it
Gianaa9 said: There isn't BeMoreExpressive in the picture... but if it's really the same tactic it could be random effect
Edit: I checked and it looks to be identical to the top one Expand
Ah shit, you're right. Apologies @A Smile you were right too. I'll upload the correct version when I'm able to. I don't think I can get this thread removed due to it being tested
A Smile said: It is the same as the top tactical EF 424 IF HP V2 P101 AC...... but the score has dropped from 63.2 to 62.8, it is not known whether this is due to random test results or SI tweaks to the match engine. Expand
It's not the same pal, albeit all I added was be more expressive. Just wanted to see if this had any impact on the end result plus I also wanted to see how it would test with run at defence
mmigueis said: Do you make any changes to whom the inside forwards man-mark when you play against teams that play with wingbacks (instead of fullbacks)? Expand
To be honest, you've brought up a really good point. I haven't changed it in the past because I've forgotten about the instruction but I would say yes change it to the wing back. So alternate between full back and wingback depending on the opposition formation
Changes-
Added invite crosses
Hey, it depends on the size of my squad to be honest, if I have short arses then no, I also won't play invite crosses, but If I have quite a tall team and the oppisition is vulnerable to the odd set piece then Ill add it, I also look out for the assitant manager pre game telling me to do it
Changes-
Mentality to balanced
Edit:
I checked and it looks to be identical to the top one
Ah shit, you're right. Apologies @A Smile you were right too. I'll upload the correct version when I'm able to. I don't think I can get this thread removed due to it being tested
It's not the same pal, albeit all I added was be more expressive. Just wanted to see if this had any impact on the end result plus I also wanted to see how it would test with run at defence
This won't get tested unless you follow these steps https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
To be honest, you've brought up a really good point. I haven't changed it in the past because I've forgotten about the instruction but I would say yes change it to the wing back. So alternate between full back and wingback depending on the opposition formation
Changes-
Removed hold up ball, roam from position, close down more and mark specific position from IF
Added hold position to DM