The full back on attack is very similar to how the wing back on attack performs. I'm not on my computer at the moment so can't look at the difference in PIs but the PIs set on the FB push them to act more like wingbacks so changing the role to wingback shouldn't have too much of an impact. The DM role in my opinion is the best role for the defensive midfield especially covered with another DM. I've checked out other role combinations and they weren't as effective as the double pivot DM. In regards to AP role in AM I'm not a fan. Something doesn't seem right with it even alongside an AF. The game may tell that role is more effective along with another role but I think it's been proven for a while now that AM and AF are most effective. Thank you for the kind words. Appreciate it 👍
Zippo said: The purpose of fm-arena tactic testing is not to create competition between tactic creators, the purpose is to help people to find the most effective to play FM and try to reveal how FM work under the hood.
I also want to add that at the moment we find the accuracy of fm-arena tactics is already excessively high and something much more less accurate would work just fine to play FM.
I mean an accuracy of +/- 5 pts or even -/+ 10 pts would be enough already and gave people a massive edge over AI managers in the game. We really don't need an accuracy like +/- 1 or 2 pts or even 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 pts. Expand
I appreciate that and like I said it wasn't meant to come across as being disrespectful
At this moment the highest score is 63.2 pts(the 1st place) so to be tested for more than 4800 matches (up to 9600 matches) a tactic must score higher than 63.2 pts after 4800 matches and keep getting a score above 63.2 after every additional test until it reaches 9600 matches.
I hope it helps.
Cheers. Expand
I don't mean no disrespect to you or the creators of the tactics but I don't see how that is a fair comparison on the tactics around these 2. All other tactics around these have had 9600 matches and has more than likely had a drop in points over them additional 4800 matches but yet are showing further down the table against a tactic that has been tested for half of the games they have.
Have you submitted right screenshots? a mirrored version would see the PF and IFa on the left side but the screenshot is showing both IF's on support and both strikers as AF
Changes-
Added be more disciplined
Attacking, it's on the first screenshot pal
Holiday tested, AM in charge of training. Set pieces left to SP coach
Changes-
Removed roam from position to IF left
Removed hold up ball from IF right
Added roam from position to AF
Holiday tested, AM in charge of training, best XI selected. Set pieces left to SP coach
Changes-
Added roam from position to PF
Changes-
Removed roam from position from PF
Removed hold up ball, roam from position and close down more from IF
Holiday tested, AM in charge in training, best XI selected. Set pieces left to SP coach.
Changes-
Removed hold up ball from IF
Removed roam from position from PF
I also want to add that at the moment we find the accuracy of fm-arena tactics is already excessively high and something much more less accurate would work just fine to play FM.
I mean an accuracy of +/- 5 pts or even -/+ 10 pts would be enough already and gave people a massive edge over AI managers in the game. We really don't need an accuracy like +/- 1 or 2 pts or even 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 pts.
I appreciate that and like I said it wasn't meant to come across as being disrespectful
No, this tactic won't be tested further.
At this moment the highest score is 63.2 pts(the 1st place) so to be tested for more than 4800 matches (up to 9600 matches) a tactic must score higher than 63.2 pts after 4800 matches and keep getting a score above 63.2 after every additional test until it reaches 9600 matches.
I hope it helps.
Cheers.
I don't mean no disrespect to you or the creators of the tactics but I don't see how that is a fair comparison on the tactics around these 2. All other tactics around these have had 9600 matches and has more than likely had a drop in points over them additional 4800 matches but yet are showing further down the table against a tactic that has been tested for half of the games they have.
Thanks
and this https://fm-arena.com/thread/12681-zaz-sapphire-alternative/
and this https://fm-arena.com/thread/12475-424-classic-cbp87-x-ps-v1-5-bw/
Holiday tested, AM in charge of training, Set pieces left to SP coach