Chewbacca
It works like a charm for Man Utd :cool:



Delicious said: Congratz i guess,but i won't hear people complain to me ^^. I have just have ultra-long queque.

https://fm-arena.com/thread/3150-424-alhamdulillah/


Can't wait to see those tactic tested.

I bet there'll be a lot of them at the top. :cool:

@Delicious, all the top tactics are based on the combination of the TIs and Balanced mentality you found. You really did a great job. :)
Chocorelo19 said: On 2.4 From strikers I removed Mark tighter and shoot less often and from Ifs mark tighter also removed. I dont remember changing anything else. compare yourself

Now, I'm confused even more. :(

Are the below supposed changed for Prometheus 2.4?

Chocorelo19 said: The differences are probably on the player instructions. Most of them left as it was on Prometheus 2.0.

I might be blind I've checked it few times and did found any difference with Soft&Wet.

Could you tell me which Player Instructions did you change.

I'm talking about Prometheus 2.4.

Thanks.
@Chocorelo19, could you please clear it for me - https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/17816/

Thanks.
Chocorelo19 said: Bro it's my tactic and he made tweaks.. are you for real now ?

I think you didn't get my point.

I really don't care who tweaked whose tactic.

I just checked your Prometheus 2.4 and didn't found any difference with Soft&Wet.

So that's why I asked you what I was missing.

Probably, you uploaded a wrong tactic or something like that.

Or there's a difference and I just missed it.

Thanks.
@Chocorelo19, hi.

I wanted to try your Prometheus 2.4 tactic but after I plugging it I noticed that the Tactical Style was "Soft&Wet" then I checked the rest of tactic and found it's the same as Soft&Wet - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/3909-soft-wet-4-2-4/

I'm confused. Am I missing something here? Is there any difference?

Thanks.
Delicious said: I was allucinating,was sure  he did "tweaked" IV and not III.



It's like @Steelwoodsaid, it's like you adding tempo and penetration, we have to understand that those tactics are runned on a certain league,overlaps helps the team to penetrate very defensive team,like in game if you are "City" maybe expect for some singularities, IA is going to play defensive against you. On the test is different, every manager is setuped with the same tendecies and they never close up, so we can't really say if is overlap being "useless" or "just giving a bit of tempo",in order to proper test it, the option should been tested in order to face only "defensive approaches" teams with it off and on, that's a limit of the "test", but we can't really have everything.
Maybe that's why it gave that result on from the test,but really setuping "leagues" to check out an option is a bit "funny".


Ok, thank you for the explanation.
Delicious said: One with overlap did scored more and took more goals

Did you mean that a tactic without Overlap scores more goals?

Because I see that your 4132 Poirer XIII without Overlaps scored more goals than with Overlaps.

Am I correct?
Hello,

I'm really confused right now.

I see people often use 'Overlaps' Team Instruction in their tactics.

But the same tactic was tested with and without 'Overlaps' and the result was almost the same

Overlaps - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/3838-4132-poirer-xiii/

No Overlaps - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/3911-4132-poirer-xiii-no-overlaps/


Also, here's another test of the 'Overlaps' instruction and it also indicates that it does nothing - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2910-overlap-left-amp-right/

I wonder what's the purpose of the 'Overlaps'?

I'd greatly appreciated if someone explain it to me.

Thanks.
Nice one! :thup:
Another very good tactic, gratz!
senna said: Lower defensive line

:D


I also noticed that :)
Nice post! Thank for the efforts. :thup:
crizeKOS said: Spoiler https://www.youtube.com/@RDFTactics
https://www.twitch.tv/rdftactics[/spoiler]


His tactic looks like a tweak of your tactic :goofy:

Did he mention you?
crizeKOS said: Hey guys, we are getting famous ^^



LOL, who is that guy?
Much appreciated! :thup:
Yes, the result of this tactic proves that Inverted Wingers can work as good as Defensive Wingers
a new leader, GZ! :)