Chewbacca
Jeffdekker said: Ever heard of Google?

Not many sites started testing yet on FM23, when they do, I'll show you ;)


then we'll talk about that when you have facts on your hands and not just empty words
Jeffdekker said: It is though.
I've seen many tactics perform the same over 3 testing leagues, yet others not.
Care to elaborate?


those are empty words

give links I want to check it
@ZaZ, do you find the AI managers have become much tougher in FM23?
@MakeSuRE, what training do you suggest for the tactic.
Milakus said: Hey,

I'm a very lazy person and I find doing the shouts is boring as hell so I always leave to my assistant manager and it seems he's been doing great :)


I'm glad to find out that I'm not only one that lazy :goofy:
@ZaZ, what does "Low" mean in the tactic names?
ZaZ said: You are correct, they are the same. I just named 1.0 because we are leaving beta next week.

Ok, thanks.
@ZaZ, I assume that Fire 0.3 and Fire 1.0 are the same tactics or there're some changes between them?
sadly, the defense doesn't look good :(
ZaZ said: To be fair, he is unrealistically overpowered in reality too.
yeah, I just can't not to agree wit that :D
I think testing tactics with Man City should be forbidden :goofy: because Erling Haaland is unrealistically overpowered in FM :D

@ZaZ, have you tried any 4-4-2 in the beta yet? What is your opinion about 4-4-2?
Tsubasa said: I've tried the tactic with Man Utd



95 pts with MU is a very good result! :thup:
Tsubasa said: I've tried the tactic with Man Utd



Ouch... this tactic in on "Very Attacking" mentality :shock: 

but 127 goals with Man Uts isn't bad at all
Tsubasa said: Volantes and Inverted Wingers... that looks interesting :)

I've tried a similar tactic and it worked really well in the beta.
That would be great if 4-3-3 tactics work well in FM23 because 4-3-3 is one of my favorite formations
I'd say it's a decent result but to be fair, it's nothing special
@Solaris could you please try it with Arsenal too?

Thanks.
FM23 Beta has been released! :thup: