Grimlock said: Hhmm... I've tried it and it didn't do anything. Probably, I'm missing something here. Expand
did u setup new scenario or change default one which is blank at first? dunno why but newly created scenarios don't work for me like that, and with default one it's ok
pixar said: This is exactly why I use a light version of every tactic. In terms of managing both conditions and cards efficiently. For this reason, I pay special attention to the match plans function in the game.
When I get a +3 score advantage, my team plays with this light version. When losing, I play with a positive or offensive weight. It makes my job much easier, especially when I use the instant result feature. Expand
and you still can use match plans even with normal match w/o instant result that's just the easier way to not forget to make changes sometimes
The amount of yellow cards has dropped almost 4 times and the amount of fouls has dropped almost 3 times:
'Get Stuck In' TI and 'Tackle Harder' PI
No 'Get Stuck In' TI and 'Easy Off Tackles' PI
Please note, it doesn't make sense testing 'Easy Off Tackles' PI with 'Get Stuck In' TI activated because 'Get Stuck In' TI overrides 'Easy Off Tackles' PI. Expand
"ease off" PI is just harsh to results but I'd love to see results w/o "get stuck" TI and w/o any tackle PI if it's possible
guess result would drop, but not that hard like with "ease off"
p.s. also many players on def side have "doesn't dive into tackles" trait which is contrary with tackle hard PI
Cherknam said: I guess we'll have to wait and see the 5,760 test. Although I'm mostly wondering about which of IW and IF is better suited to my young wingers to get them higher match ratings Expand
Mark said: My strategy has now changed. Base tactic will be 424 Alhamdulillah II. To chase goals I will move a DM up to AM and use 4132 Poirer XIV. To protect a lead I will drop a ST back to DM and use this tactic. Perfect use of the Delicious tactics, best tactic, best attack and best defence. And relatively easy to move between them. Expand
433 is kinda hard to transform into during match, cuz u have to move one of AFs to CM I’d prefer set of 424, 4132 and 4231 so basically 424 as goto, 4132 when u need goals and 4231 to close the match when comfortably winning and all those 3 are much easier to transform one into another than with 433
did u setup new scenario or change default one which is blank at first?
dunno why but newly created scenarios don't work for me like that, and with default one it's ok
works like this
just set some changes in match plan and play the game 😄
When I get a +3 score advantage, my team plays with this light version. When losing, I play with a positive or offensive weight. It makes my job much easier, especially when I use the instant result feature.
and you still can use match plans even with normal match w/o instant result
that's just the easier way to not forget to make changes sometimes
https://fm-arena.com/tactic/4118-424-alhamdulillah-ii-easy-off-tackles/
The amount of yellow cards has dropped almost 4 times and the amount of fouls has dropped almost 3 times:
'Get Stuck In' TI and 'Tackle Harder' PI
No 'Get Stuck In' TI and 'Easy Off Tackles' PI
Please note, it doesn't make sense testing 'Easy Off Tackles' PI with 'Get Stuck In' TI activated because 'Get Stuck In' TI overrides 'Easy Off Tackles' PI.
"ease off" PI is just harsh to results
but I'd love to see results w/o "get stuck" TI and w/o any tackle PI if it's possible
guess result would drop, but not that hard like with "ease off"
p.s. also many players on def side have "doesn't dive into tackles" trait which is contrary with tackle hard PI
so more or less RNG
It's not gonna be tornadoed, so we won't know
0.3 IF standard, WB wide
Spoiler
0.4 IF narrow, WB standard
Spoiler
0.5 all standard
Spoiler
0.6 IF wide, WB standard
Spoiler
0.7 all wide
Spoiler
0.8 IF wide, WB narrow
Spoiler
0.9 IF standard, WB narrow
Spoiler
0.10 all narrow
Spoiler
it could be just RNG, that IW got 1pts less, so it seems they are +- the same
going with underlaps, and less crossing for all flank players + Anchor instead of DM
didn't touch any of width PIs on players
0.1 IW with same additional PIs as the IF on original tactic + cross less
0.2 IW just with same stay narrow and tackle harder PIs as the original IF
tackle hard for all positions, dribble more for bpd, stay wide for sides BPDs, take fewer risks for GK
1st
Spoiler
2nd
Spoiler
3rd just going almost full att with WBs, VOLs and AF on att duty
Spoiler
4th just like 3rd but with attacking strikers and supporting mid
Spoiler
DMs to Vol(su)
1st with pf(su)-af-pf(su)
2nd with pf(att)- af- pf (att)
433 is kinda hard to transform into during match, cuz u have to move one of AFs to CM
I’d prefer set of 424, 4132 and 4231
so basically 424 as goto, 4132 when u need goals and 4231 to close the match when comfortably winning
and all those 3 are much easier to transform one into another than with 433
need to check prochazka 57pts with narrow width and underlaps instead of overs
I know, Trent is taking corners at Liverpool holiday runs, but even 35 is rare. And he make a lot of assists from crosses too.
53 is really impressive
106 points, 170 scored, 19 conceded
Haaland ended the season with 107 goals
Won all the Trophies
Only had 2 loses and 1 draw in the season
forget about Haaland
Silva 53 assists, that's impressive