opq
Milakus said: Hi, @opq.

What the difference between 'roaming mess', 'even more roaming mess' and 'roaming mess mez'?

Can you share any result?

Tnx.


it's above, I'm just f..d up post as couldn't upload screenshots somehow
"even more" is for teh lulz only with swapping DM to Regista
main version is with CMsup, mez - with mezzalas obviously :)
Roaming Mess

Main change is at the tactic's name itself - I just gave roam to almost every position except GK, BPD and DM (in "even more" version DM -> Regista, so he roams too)
It's exact opposite approach from what I use with my "cross" tactics: flanks set to shoot less and cross less + work ball into box TI

Central trio is more on supporting role, without forward runs, so less option as 2nd wave, but more stable
with Liverpool
Spoiler

with Brentford
Spoiler

option with 2nd wave aka mezzalas
with Liverpool
Spoiler

with Brentford
Spoiler
GJ!
for someone he knows who NOT THIS STERIL version
sadly, it can't be 3 Volantes at once, so at least you'll get 2 of them xD
it wouldn't be me if i didn't try to sterilize tho, so AM goes to CMat, still it's more then attacking role
MemorizableUsername said: Inspired to pick up my old 3ATB tactic to tweak it around, some early test results

its kinda hard to find suitable players for WCB role, so I just gave up on it
tried them too
MemorizableUsername said: God speed man, getting a reliable 3ATB tactic is the hardest so far

it's not that hard, u ONLY need 3 good CBs and at least 1 decent for rotation xD
WBs are crucial, but everyone can cross the ball in this ME really, just not everyone can def properly

Pool run with main
sub WBs with 19 and 17 assists
Aight, going back to real testing and not finding if something is just cosmetics or not :)

2 versions of balanced 3412
1: pretty base
2: when we're comfortably winning just to stop WBs from going byline and prevent unnecessary risk

added hold position for DMs to not reverting them in def mode but still be a little cautious with their movement as we already have 5 men upfront
going through center as we're on strong side here due to player count but still with overlaps for help from WBs
distribution just by rolling out to CBs as there were many longthrows to flanks where WBs were already under pressure getting the ball
removed Tackle harder PI from AFs as this really no need to, as they mainly intercept balls and not killing opposing defs anyway

PS. it's AM and not SS just because my AMs at main save are slow turtles and would be awful SS. Could be easily swapped.
Don't swap WBs to CWBs as you already have many players at central zones, and CWBs tend to move in half flanks often, so u just lose width which sometimes is crucial to stretch defense.
Sane said: @opq Maybe it's worth testing tweaks with trap inside/outside, tweak with a medium block and tweak with tight marking?

yeah, but my queue for test this solely things is already not that fast :)
poirer xiv + step up more
poirer xiv + be expressive
poirer xiv + play out of D

57 GA xD
crizeKOS said: Yeah, I meant narrow with underlaps too

as you asked
wide + underlaps to finish this test off
poirer xiv with wide as only change
poirer xiv narrow with change from overlaps to underlaps
crizeKOS said: can u test the same stuff with underlaps?

gonna do with width first :)
So, narrow width didn't make the best defensive formation any better and made best attacking one worse both at attack and defense.
ok, not just cosmetics
just narrowing things
3PF with minimum width
@Delicious  Poirer XIV with minimum width

p.s. made it only to see if width is cosmetics too :)