Verdilo said: Thanks for reply. I checked both reputation. Sancho has about 8500 and Fati 9500... Also, Fati has 5 years till end of the contract. Dont know anything now... League reputations are close. 180-181 for Premier League. Expand are you talking about Home or World reputation?
ta2199 said: Does Club ranking or reputation gonna affect the price ? Expand
Every player in the game has "Reputation" which is hidden (you can see it only with help of in-game editors) and the "Reputation" greatly affects the price. When a player wins high reputable competitions, wins personal rewards and gets high ratings then his reputation increases.
Also, the reputation of the league has impact on the price too.
And of course the remining length of the contract makes a contribution to the price.
Manidaro7 said: Is there a guide to screams from the sidelines and pre-game, halftime and end-of-game speeches? Expand
Just get a good assistant manager, delegate everything to him and forget about it because I find it's not fun, repetitive and boring and if you'd ask me then SI should made all that stuff to be optional.
DeviAngel said: BTtw do you know why some tactics have a different grade on different forums ? Expand
Because testing tactics isn't a simple thing to do and if it was a simple thing to do then everyone easily could do that and what's mostly important everyone would get the same result but as you can see many people and different sites test tactics and they all get different results, sometimes their results are quite similar and sometimes are very different.
The methodology of testing determines the quality of testing. Different tactics testing sources use different methodology some of them test without FMRTE and some of them test only 38 matches thinking it's enough and so on... that's why everyone gets different results.
Alinix78 said: Is it possible to test also 433 Total War X ? the previous version got a decent rating 4.7, and this new tactic gives me even better results and play Expand
ivanolo5 said: Did anyone test to put the striker with more offensive role like advanced forward or poacher? Because I'm starting a fiorentina save and my striker this season will be Dusan Vlahovic and i want him to score as many goals as possible. So I would like to know if with any of those roles I would ruin the tactic. Expand
A different role for the striker doesn't work that well for me.
I'm sorry but I still don't get it. You said that "a lot of people stopped testing tactics here", please, could you give few names... I wonder who are these people.
CBP87 said: I'll be honest, I'm not expecting it to do well in the test but its did well in my own testing, so I thought I'd put it out there to see how it got on Expand
Btw, I don't say strikerless tactics aren't good this year, they are decent but nowhere near what they were in FM21... sadly
are you talking about Home or World reputation?
ta2199 said: Does Club ranking or reputation gonna affect the price ?
I think only club reputation matters
Also, the reputation of the league has impact on the price too.
And of course the remining length of the contract makes a contribution to the price.
Just get a good assistant manager, delegate everything to him and forget about it because I find it's not fun, repetitive and boring and if you'd ask me then SI should made all that stuff to be optional.
I've tried it with Norwich, predicted 20th and got 67 points which I find a very good result.
Btw, I didn't make any transfers.
Because testing tactics isn't a simple thing to do and if it was a simple thing to do then everyone easily could do that and what's mostly important everyone would get the same result but as you can see many people and different sites test tactics and they all get different results, sometimes their results are quite similar and sometimes are very different.
The methodology of testing determines the quality of testing. Different tactics testing sources use different methodology some of them test without FMRTE and some of them test only 38 matches thinking it's enough and so on... that's why everyone gets different results.
There's only 1 small tweak compared with "Double Tweaked" - Force Opposition Outside instruction and that's all.
The tweak seems slight improves the defense.
Nice One!
Here's my result with Triple Tweaked.
Leeds, predicted 12th
I just noticed this tactic uses Team Instruction "Distribute To Specific Team-Mate" like in this tactic - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/2454-zaz-blue-dm-double-tweaked/ and I haven't seen this team instruction in any other tactic. Also, it use the same set pieces and most roles matche so obviously, this tactic is based on this tactic - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/2454-zaz-blue-dm-double-tweaked/ and I guess @JohnSariman should mentioned that.
I think not only @cptdoggo deserves getting credits...
the previous version got a decent rating 4.7, and this new tactic gives me even better results and play
check this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/1661-how-fm-arena-picks-tactics-for-the-testing/
A different role for the striker doesn't work that well for me.
I'm sorry but I still don't get it. You said that "a lot of people stopped testing tactics here", please, could you give few names... I wonder who are these people.
Can you give at least one example?
Any examples?
I've checked the latest Will1981's testing league and found that all the AI teams in the league play with the same formation 4-3-3 DM
Don't you think that it's a bit weird test tactics in a league where all the AI teams play with the same 4-3-3 DM formation
There are no 4-2-3-1, 4-4-2 or 5-3-2 formations which are among the most popular AI formations in the game:
Btw, I don't say strikerless tactics aren't good this year, they are decent but nowhere near what they were in FM21... sadly