lordus said: Why isn't this tactic #1?? It's the same points (57) but has a better Goal difference. Expand
If you do the overall isn't really 57 but maybe 56,30 (example) and the n1 is 56,41 (example) that's why this isn't first. And we really don't care about GD around here to be honest
reverted to much higher d line like Italian KOs, maybe that's the "green zone". Trying out DW compared to IW as well and seem DM(D) is a bit better then (s), yet need to check DM on Hold position to be sure. For now gonna check that way
IF on wider underlap on left and overlap on right
Double Volante for Spicy-Build
IWB instead of WB and underlaps
DW instead of Winger
Much lower D line instead of Higher
Made some tweaks on PI, trying now with Winger instead of IW/DW.
IF+WB combo and IW on right, Underlap on both flanks
BPD instead of WCB and IWs on narrower
Interesting
WCB instead of BPD on DCR
DCR without Dribble more
Checking out this kind of setup with WB on Wider and IW on Narrower, BPD on right(DCR) with dribble more
If you do the overall isn't really 57 but maybe 56,30 (example) and the n1 is 56,41 (example) that's why this isn't first. And we really don't care about GD around here to be honest
Double DM on (su)
Trying to check the style again, double DM on (D)
to Complete the route. WB(su) + IW(A)
highly Structured way. IW+WB
Trying High Structured way
reverted to much higher d line like Italian KOs, maybe that's the "green zone". Trying out DW compared to IW as well and seem DM(D) is a bit better then (s), yet need to check DM on Hold position to be sure. For now gonna check that way