BLUE FIRE said: sorry in any case I would like to know for example by pure chance because of the tests on the tactics already predefined like vertical tiki taka or control of the possession. to know who is the strongest Expand
Not really tested the preset, but just something called "preset+SI+Control+Possession" would be lead me to another place.
BLUE FIRE said: I think your tactics are always the same. this one is amazing. in all your tactics there is at least one theft and it's true that it works well but i find that you do a lot of variations sorry for the words. in all with this tactic 1st with celta vigo Expand
That's because i am trying to understand what the matter with those iwbs and IWs. I didn't really understand what you meant there.
Zippo said: Unforutanlty, without knowing the fractional part of the score number it's hard to say for sure because it could be like this:
After 1,200 matches the score might be 51.5111 points, which will be rounded to 52 points
and after 4,000 matches the score might be 49.4999 which will be rounded to 49 points
So without knowing the fractional part you see that there's 3 points difference ( 52 - 49 = 3 ) between the 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches tests, when actually, there's only 2.01 points difference ( 51.5111 - 49.4999 = 2.01 )
In general, at this point we've simulated 1,088,000 matches under our new testing database and we've got the following RNG statistic:
There's 45% probability of changing the result more than 1 point between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches.
There's 12,5% probability of changing the result more than 2 points between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches.
There's 1,4% probability of changing the result more than 3 points between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches.
So in theory there could be 3 points difference between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches but the probably of it is about 1.4%. Btw, I've checked the result of this tactic and this tactic hit it.
Also, I want to add that there might be 1 - 1.5 points RNG even between two 4,000 matches tests of the same tactic. For example, if we take the current top tactic(424 Bombyte Tweak), which has a score of 57.4465 points, and we test it one more time for 4,000 matches then its score might vary +/- 1-1.5 points around 57.4465.
So you always should consider that there might be at least 1 point RNG even after 4,000 matches. In terms of FM, 1 point RNG is nothing because when you play FM in normal way and the length of your season is 38 matches then your RNG might be as high as 20-25 points and such RNG is a normal thing for underdogs and mid table teams, of course, for the strongest teams in the league the RNG is much smaller but still it's much higher than the 1 point that we have after 4,000 matches on our test. Expand
I did hit the jackpot! Btw i wasn't complain was just like the first time i did noticed with the new test league a 3 point different.
BLUE FIRE said: I think it would be good if you alternated for example an iwb at or de on the left and an iwb su or iw at and on the other side an iw su Expand
BLUE FIRE said: please haven't you done any tests on the defensive lines because very low defensive lines are useless the best and the standard some say it's the high nothing the best what do you think Expand
Imho the defensive D line is something you "adapt" even on the test league, for example on mine, Much Higher D line is 3-4 points better then any Low D line.
Translated you need to adapt that to the style and players you actually have.
Not really tested the preset, but just something called "preset+SI+Control+Possession" would be lead me to another place.
That's because i am trying to understand what the matter with those iwbs and IWs. I didn't really understand what you meant there.
At least it did like the IWB!
After 1,200 matches the score might be 51.5111 points, which will be rounded to 52 points
and after 4,000 matches the score might be 49.4999 which will be rounded to 49 points
So without knowing the fractional part you see that there's 3 points difference ( 52 - 49 = 3 ) between the 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches tests, when actually, there's only 2.01 points difference ( 51.5111 - 49.4999 = 2.01 )
In general, at this point we've simulated 1,088,000 matches under our new testing database and we've got the following RNG statistic:
There's 45% probability of changing the result more than 1 point between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches.
There's 12,5% probability of changing the result more than 2 points between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches.
There's 1,4% probability of changing the result more than 3 points between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches.
So in theory there could be 3 points difference between 1,200 matches and 4,000 matches but the probably of it is about 1.4%. Btw, I've checked the result of this tactic and this tactic hit it.
Also, I want to add that there might be 1 - 1.5 points RNG even between two 4,000 matches tests of the same tactic. For example, if we take the current top tactic(424 Bombyte Tweak), which has a score of 57.4465 points, and we test it one more time for 4,000 matches then its score might vary +/- 1-1.5 points around 57.4465.
So you always should consider that there might be at least 1 point RNG even after 4,000 matches. In terms of FM, 1 point RNG is nothing because when you play FM in normal way and the length of your season is 38 matches then your RNG might be as high as 20-25 points and such RNG is a normal thing for underdogs and mid table teams, of course, for the strongest teams in the league the RNG is much smaller but still it's much higher than the 1 point that we have after 4,000 matches on our test.
I did hit the jackpot! Btw i wasn't complain was just like the first time i did noticed with the new test league a 3 point different.
was 55
added cross less often to WBs.
didn't remove cross less often. I will on the next
I will, but never worked on plug and play tactics
removed focus flanks.
added back the low crosses...
Gonna try another with WBs and be more expressive.
The results on Spaghetti league are :
7x 🍝 Leagues
15x 🍜 Cups
points on average = 8?
Let's see what happened with IWBs on 343
Wingers instead of IWs and with Roam from position
Roaming from position to all AMs roles
Added Roam from position to IWs
Imho the defensive D line is something you "adapt" even on the test league, for example on mine, Much Higher D line is 3-4 points better then any Low D line.
Translated you need to adapt that to the style and players you actually have.
Same reasoning, from my test AF/TF offer almost the same perfomance.
DLF/CF are like -2 points.
F9 is mega terrible. Imagine Trequartista is better this season
PF is almost the same as DLF/CF. Is offering same perfomance when you play them on lateral
You can easily use, Winger/IF even Raumdeuter
Because both of them are not producing good "rating". Are more situational roles