BLUE FIRE said: please haven't you done any tests on the defensive lines because very low defensive lines are useless the best and the standard some say it's the high nothing the best what do you think Expand
Imho the defensive D line is something you "adapt" even on the test league, for example on mine, Much Higher D line is 3-4 points better then any Low D line.
Translated you need to adapt that to the style and players you actually have.
BLUE FIRE said: play out of defense is perhaps essential for possession man city guaordiola Expand
Point is : if you want to go full possession, you need to go dribble less, take less risk etc. So, it will be more up about your players then "tactic" power.
Since, i wanted to check even the fake FBs means that we putting PI in order to emulate IWBs behavior even do something will be different.
This one will be with normal IWBs, in order to check if the M.E. for some reason like the iwbs to act as WBs (since the DM slot is taken by volantes they wont to cut inside).
Maybe the cross less option is the key, i am not yet sure, will find out once the results will come out.
Imho the defensive D line is something you "adapt" even on the test league, for example on mine, Much Higher D line is 3-4 points better then any Low D line.
Translated you need to adapt that to the style and players you actually have.
Same reasoning, from my test AF/TF offer almost the same perfomance.
DLF/CF are like -2 points.
F9 is mega terrible. Imagine Trequartista is better this season
PF is almost the same as DLF/CF. Is offering same perfomance when you play them on lateral
You can easily use, Winger/IF even Raumdeuter
Because both of them are not producing good "rating". Are more situational roles
Point is : if you want to go full possession, you need to go dribble less, take less risk etc. So, it will be more up about your players then "tactic" power.
Total, possession is gonna be a bit meh. For now my best is with zerbi recreation, but i am still doing tweaks of it :
WB instead of IWBs, I did put crossless often on both of them, the only PI isn't there is roam from position.
AML without get futher forward.
IWs on get futher forward
Removed Get futher-Foward from IWs
gonna re-stamp all those tactics that can use Volante/Iwbs combo... This one has IWs with get futher foward
Checked this : https://fm-arena.com/thread/5765-424-bombyte-tweak/
I did added back get futher forward on IWs
Iwbs instead of FB (emulating iwbs)
I made it out of curiosity, tbh i don't have high expections on 433 on this patch
433 with FBs emulating IWbs
FB emulating IWBs
Ispired by the results of https://fm-arena.com/thread/5750-fireball-442-v4-0/ and https://fm-arena.com/thread/5751-fireball-442-v4-1/
TI/PI
FM23 Spaghetti League - 442 Bombyte
12x 🍝 Leagues
5x 🍜 Cups
points on average = 8?
Since, i wanted to check even the fake FBs means that we putting PI in order to emulate IWBs behavior even do something will be different.
This one will be with normal IWBs, in order to check if the M.E. for some reason like the iwbs to act as WBs (since the DM slot is taken by volantes they wont to cut inside).
Maybe the cross less option is the key, i am not yet sure, will find out once the results will come out.
I am sure after 50/52 is just based on players taste
Tangfu 23