Delicious
Cherknam said: Oh why's that? (I'm new here and don't fully know how the tactic testing works)

If you hit 60 or 61 + the tactic will get tornado test
@Zippo can we have your magic statistic results,how much this one scored?
Eric said: Do you mean you uploaded a wrong tactic?

I don't really know, i might be ._. , last time i did the screen shots were wrong so it's strange
It should be without overlaps...
Another bunch of runs

PSG :
Spoiler

Udinese Scudetto Version :o : Spoiler

Pool : Spoiler
Bogeyman said: If you build your team around this tactic then I'm sure you'll get an incredible result.

But by default not many teams fit this tactic so 424 Alhamdulillah II tactic has an additional advantage over this tactic because it's much easier to fit any team into 424 Alhamdulillah II tactic.


The passion for 343 will never lose to any 424 :cry:
Did a bunch of runs for you guys!


City :

Spoiler

Pool :

Spoiler

Forest :

Spoiler

Psg :

Spoiler

Udinese :

Spoiler
4231 is consuming our soul
Mrt said: It's crazy!

It's EXTREME!
np boys next we go 4 forwards
That's literally Poirer vs the Tornado!
Itsyaboy420 said: @Delicious can you create a tactic with attacking mentality that can at least get 58 points?

I would say yes is possible but would be totaly different build
Kaewkoi said: Can I have Screen shot for fm touch user please

Just consider the Wb as FB Pi are the same


Spoiler
Okonianin said: How about OI?
Should we just use a ass.m like always or not? or something specyfic?


If you want to use OI is something you should do, let AM doing it can alter the tactic.
For me OI are always a good thing if you know what you are doing.
That's the most smart thing someone could test,because seriously i am getting trouble about how to balance all those players and maybe that's the solution, i am really waiting for this kind of test to get out.
I really hope it can work that way as well ^^!
i fell you mate! If i can butt in i don't quite understand what you trying to do now,if you need clarification or sort of just ask em
You losing it :woot:
Muukzor said: Hopefully we see some tests like ur others with Attacking IF/Volantes ^^ Maybe eek out a point haha.

In order to do that,new roles should'be tested first... Soon enough something else will poping-out
Muukzor said: Gz again! Curious, I thought IF Attacking were better than IF Supporting?

It's not really about IF anymore :P