CBP87
Based on ARGUS 26 MT 3430 P107 AC

Changes to PIs -
Added make more forward runs to IW
Added trigger press more often to IF and IW
Added mark specific position to IF and IW (IF on RB and IW on LW)









Trying W and IF combo
Whipped crosses
Quick distribution









Tweaked version of https://fm-arena.com/thread/16864-rib-tickling-stooge-v2/

Changes-
BPB changed to CB
AM changed to CHM









Tweaked version of https://fm-arena.com/thread/16856-rib-tickling-stooge/

Changes-
IW to IF
CHM to AM







Props to ZaZ, tweaked version of Autumn 1.46. Using IW instead of IF and using BCB,ACB,BCB defence









Tweaked version of https://fm-arena.com/thread/16782-drogon-v1/

Changes-
RCB changed to BCB
OCB changed to BCB
Central CB changed to ACB
Removed mark position from both IWs









Just looking to try double CHM and IF, props to the founding fathers of the top tactics for the base shape/TIs/PIs










Another strikerless for you, trying the OCB, BCB and ACB combination









Trying Allardici with IF and CHM instead of of IW on right and AM on RCM









Tweaked version of https://fm-arena.com/thread/16723-mjolnir-v1/

Changes-
Added shoot less often to AM roles
Added take more risks to AM roles









Trying two AMs and two IWs









Tweaked version of https://fm-arena.com/thread/16693-allardici-433-v1/

Changes-
Added mark position to LW/RW









kontoswedul86 said: hi.. Is this tactic effective for weaker teams? I want to try it with Bolton Wanderers.

Allardici 433 v1, using a 433 in possession and the much loved 523 out of possession, TIs and PIs are pretty much the same as the top tactics









harvestgreen22 said: Importance priority (Briefly, it can be seen from the table "3";):

table 1: Increase the attribute from its initial value to 18,
table 2: Reduce the attribute from its initial value to 1,
table 3: Subtract Table 2 from Table 1 to obtain the overall importance.

1.
Acceleration 、 Pace 、
Work Rate (The Work Rate minimum is 6 . below 6 will result in severe penalties, but above 6 will result in a small increase.)

2.
Jumping Reach 、 Dribbling 、 Concentration 、 Anticipation 、Stamina 、Agility 、 Balance

3.
Composure 、 Finishing 、 Strength 、Aggression 、 Positioning

4.
The influence of other attributes has become relatively insignificant.


Can I ask please mate, if you're using Genie Scout (GS) how would you search for players using these attributes, what value would you assign to say Jumping Reach? Sorry little confused with you saying 6 for work rate as a the minimum, would this mean the secondary attributes can be 6 or less?

Thanks
Exell said: You shoud check all PI in my tactic

Nevertheless, Diaboliq is still based on someone elses base tactic/work whether that be Knap/Gerrard or Korean creators. The whole purpose of these tests are not for people to out do each other, its so that we as a community can come up with the best possible tactic, some may even say, come up a tactic that breaks the ME (I would love that by the way). Now regardless if you feel this tactic is 90% of your work is irrelevant in my opinion, he has added something that has increased the test score and has shown us that something can work like the ACB role and I am pretty sure the rules of this site are if 2 or more changes have been made to the base tactic then you don't have to mention the base tactic creator or tactic, you can class it as your own. Come on mate, its Christmas, ligthen up
Exell said: Argus and diaboliq is two complytly diffrent tactics

You changed BCB to OCB and IF to IW and added tackle harder, not that much of a difference, some may say 90% or more is based on Argus
White Europe said: Top 30 tactics are just slight tweaks of someone else who found meta first, which was knap this year.

Exactly mate
Exell said: If someone based 90% of tactic on other people work should mention that in the first post...

You're joking right? You literally made a few changes to Argus and didn't mention Gerrard at all on your Diaboliq tactic OP