@ZaZ I did some changes here. Can you check it ? Low intensity but still great result. I change DW to W cause I remmember from last FM Winger work better with Striker than DW
I think @Zippo will come up with a solution that still give people a way to tweak other people tactics. Tweaking is not wrong tbh, just show them a way to confirm this is a tweak base on which tactic. Tweaking sometime get tactic better and better over time. Just like in fm 20, someone did just 1 or 2 changes (I dont really remmeber this), and make it to the top of the table. So even people like TFF sometimes miss something that worked well and someone finally complete the last piece. If now we forbidden people from making tweak, isn't that wierd ?
So my opinion is, allow tweak version of tactic, but make 1 to 2 question asked the author is this a tweak or not.
Basicly Im fall into the 2nd group as @Mark said. I'm the kind of player who do not have much knowledge about tactics. So I would just download other people tactic. Testing some change to see if It worked or not and sometime share this with the author so he can know what worked and what is not. Just like the thing Im doing with @ZaZ right now.
ZaZ said: In this tactic, I changed all PIs from tackle harder to ease off tackles, and it didn't affect the score at all. It doesn't mean the same will happen to any tactic, but I think it's worth a try. Expand Do you plan to make a "condition saving tactic" ? Look like this year tactics has to go in pair.
ZaZ said: I guess the results confirm what I said in previous post, that it should be a default instruction for players in this tactic. I recommend people to try the same for your tactics to see if it also holds for high intensity tactics and different formations.
Less cards, less injuries, less fatigue, less tired players needing to rotate... Definitely should be used over tackle harder. Expand
Change mentality to Cautious after winning 1 goals seem to help a bit. A lil bit shame when Ronaldo was out for the last 1 month. If he didn't injured, We could have score more than 160 goals
ZaZ said: Well, 5.3 against 5.4 from high intensity. It seems like ball retention is still a valid game this patch. Expand
With lower intensity that mean your players will be less tired. Worth for a try though. Or maybe can use this tactic after 70+ min or when leading so your player will be less tired
ZaZ said: Thanks for testing! It's at least better than average. Expand For this ME offense is better than defensive so Underdog is not going to have great result. Moving SS to Vol(At) and DLP to Vol(At) doing the work for me right now. Although It seem a lil bit like Red
ZaZ said: I tried DLP as DM too and it performed as well as RPM, so I decided to keep RPM to make the versions more different. About protection to CBs, I gave up on that long time ago when I noticed the current match engine favors attack over defense. Expand
I think you should develop a 2nd tactic for 60-70+ min. Cuz I realized that there're a lots of goal concede during that time.
ZaZ said: I tried DLP as DM too and it performed as well as RPM, so I decided to keep RPM to make the versions more different. About protection to CBs, I gave up on that long time ago when I noticed the current match engine favors attack over defense. Expand
I think you should develop a 2nd tactic for 60-70+ min. Cuz I realized that there're a lots of goal concede in that time.
FMAdept said: I used these formations before. If you train your CM-DLP to Come deep to get ball he will cover a wider range and perform better than DM. Also a lone RPM is very weak defensively because he will roam from zone 14 too often and leave your CBs unprotected. Expand
ZaZ said: Thank you for testing. I'm also testing options for the flanks. Here is another version that seems to work as good as that, with CM instead of DM. Expand
Sure, will do a test for it later. The most anoying problem when having DM is their rating is completely shite.
Low intensity but still great result. I change DW to W cause I remmember from last FM Winger work better with Striker than DW
Tweaking sometime get tactic better and better over time. Just like in fm 20, someone did just 1 or 2 changes (I dont really remmeber this), and make it to the top of the table. So even people like TFF sometimes miss something that worked well and someone finally complete the last piece. If now we forbidden people from making tweak, isn't that wierd ?
So my opinion is, allow tweak version of tactic, but make 1 to 2 question asked the author is this a tweak or not.
Basicly Im fall into the 2nd group as @Mark said. I'm the kind of player who do not have much knowledge about tactics. So I would just download other people tactic. Testing some change to see if It worked or not and sometime share this with the author so he can know what worked and what is not. Just like the thing Im doing with @ZaZ right now.
Do you plan to make a "condition saving tactic" ? Look like this year tactics has to go in pair.
Less cards, less injuries, less fatigue, less tired players needing to rotate... Definitely should be used over tackle harder.
Do that mean we should remove Tackle hard PI ?
True. I'm not kind of people that wanted to win 4-2. I want 2-0
With lower intensity that mean your players will be less tired. Worth for a try though. Or maybe can use this tactic after 70+ min or when leading so your player will be less tired
Did you move SS to CM ? He score a lots of goals for me so a bit concerning
Looking forward for it
For this ME offense is better than defensive so Underdog is not going to have great result.
Moving SS to Vol(At) and DLP to Vol(At) doing the work for me right now. Although It seem a lil bit like Red
I think you should develop a 2nd tactic for 60-70+ min. Cuz I realized that there're a lots of goal concede during that time.
I think you should develop a 2nd tactic for 60-70+ min. Cuz I realized that there're a lots of goal concede in that time.
interesting insight
Sure, will do a test for it later. The most anoying problem when having DM is their rating is completely shite.
Having the same idea about the formation but I think W(At) gonna do a better job this year. Gonna test this now
Result:
And I do think DM position is better than CM