A Smile
Change:
AF+CFS+AF+IFS→
CFS+AF+CFS+IFA

Suddenly found that this formation is also very potential, there can be several changes in the front quadrangle, I think this combination should be better.
Kane actually has his own tactical post on the PGM forum, many of which he has researched before. However, the rules do need to be strictly adhered to, which is also to respect ARENA's efforts.
There is no doubt that rules should be followed. However, I think it is best to test the tactics several times in advance, and then do it after feeling the effect is good. Of course, it is better to have some own ideas in the tactics. As I have said before, many minor details can't beat RNG if you change a few of them. We can't let ARENA waste resources just testing one of our idea changes, which I think everyone can think of a dozen in a moment, and then only need 10 minutes of vacation test screenshots.
CFS+AF+IFS→AF+CFS+IFA

The structure of the combination of the three is adjusted, and the effect will become good?
IFS→SS
Add"Overlap Left"
WOW,64 points, 18 goal difference!
The same attacking style is used in this 4-3-3 formation.
This setting should be more reasonable.
sponsorkindest said: @A Smile : there is a mismatch between screenshot and the tactic tested. The tactic tested is for right flank play but the screenshot is for left flank play

I made a mistake, my lineup in the league is more suitable for mirror positions, forgot to modify.:(
Same style.
On the basis of 424 deformation IU, SS becomes AF.
A more aggressive version, perhaps followed by a worse defense?
AM+DM version.
The importance of WBA in the current tactical engine is almost irreplaceable, check the gap between WBS and it. Using the No. 1 Kane's 4231 as a template for the test.
At the same time, check whether there is a difference in "Pass Into Space".
The importance of WBA in the current tactical engine is almost irreplaceable, check the gap between WBS and it. Using the No. 1 Kane's 4231 as a template for the test.
Changes compared with Ⅰ
DL:WBA→WBS
AMR:IFA→IWS
DR:WBA→WBS
Strengthen the defense and see what happens.
Change:
DLPS→CMS
This combination of responsibilities is not in line with the characteristics of the engine, I try my best to do the best, but with the mainstream configuration is still a big gap, look at the result.
Just like the 4231 formation it seems that different Settings are fine, pick one of them and try it.
BWMD+AP combination, discard irregular shape.