wow! This formation really deserves a better position. I have compared the effect of IFS and SS through 424 deformation and 4231 deformation test and online competition during the holiday, and IFS is obviously better. So, it should be better than 424 deformation II.
This combination of responsibilities 4231 is so powerful that various attack panel Settings can work well, and try to see if the underlap Settings are actually less effective. The underlap left&right was increased without any other changes.
dzek said: I have already test underlaps in any possible way in terms of TIs and it seems that they decrease the score. It has to do with formation and roles. I agree with the rest Expand
Good job!Can you keep trying the underlap? I've tested many different variations myself before, and even without changing any of the other instructions, the holiday test results are just as strong. It's amazing, and it doesn't make sense... The combination of duties in the 4231 formation is so strong that I don't think the comparison of the test results of these different offensive sets even 4,000 games can be truly accurate.
In the current version, 4231 is a really good formation, including three AMC stands. Under the dual DMS press setup, the various adjustments of the attack panel are very good, and it is difficult to say which setting is better unless tested individually. To further reduce the passing errors of DMS, "Dribble More" can be added to its personal instructions. After adjusting the intensity of the long shot, the new version can add More "Shoot Less Often" to various positions, including "Dribble More",Maybe there will be some improvement.
In our online leagues, the narrow diamond is considered to be the weakest formation and has been for about three versions (FM22,23,24). We have a player who loves this formation, he always sticks to this formation, and the result is that he always loses. I think the narrow diamond is probably the worst formation against AI. Does anyone want to join us for a challenge? Try to get a relatively high score.
In fact, under the current engine, personal instructions are not very important, you can set according to your own preferences. When it comes to adding personal instructions, I think there are a few that would be helpful, in order of priority: "Tackle Harder", "Take More Risks", "Dribble More", "Shoot Less Often", these are all you can use, and it is good to add to each position.
Before the engine update, this was my best tactic in online leagues, but now everything seems to have changed. Instead of "Pass Into Space", the DMS opted to "Get Further Forward" and was very dominant under the previous engine. The current engine also performed as well in the holiday test.
dzek said: I hope it goes well because I've heard from others that "Pass Into Space" especially in the "Attacking" mentality doesn't help that much. Maybe because there are no moves into space by the players or maybe because in a more aggressive mentality they are already doing it and activating the instruction to do it more than they should. We'll see! Expand
It does not seem to make much difference. But today I played an online qualifying match against a super team (I am now a second division coach and just took over recently), and I used this tactic, and the result was a home and away double win, and a statistical advantage, which is the first time since I took over this strong opponent .
We have so many test tactics that a lot of times we can't pay too much attention to the changes in some details .In my previous test of the 424 Frog Whirl, the results of removing the "Pass Into Space" setting were better, with a difference of 58 and 54 points. But there are also examples of the opposite. In these two days of online qualifying matches, I found that the defensive midfielders were often tackled out of the ball, so I added the forward press command, and then removed the "Pass Into Space", and performed very well in the traditional 433 tactics. A normal traditional 433 tactic is always difficult to play in either solo or online matches. But a good 4-3-3 is incredibly powerful and probably the most controlled formation, even though it never gets a higher score on a single vacation test. So I gave it a try in the Brazilian box and got my personal best goal difference so far in my holiday test. Of course it's not the one I uploaded, I always test it at least 2-3 times.
Continue to change on the basis of 4222 golden mean III，Continue to remove "Focus Paly Down The Left/Right" and "Overlap Left/Right".Although this will make the attack less powerful, but perhaps more fluid coordination will make the counterattack more effective.
I don't know if there has been a recent change in the game engine, but I have experienced in online league games that the "Pass Into Space" command leads to a significant increase in passing errors, and it is necessary to remove this command in order to play more smoothly in a high-intensity pressing style. Take the 4222 formation for example and see how the test went.
It is still The front pressure setting of DMS+DMS. In my opinion, such a defensive midfield combination can even make some key Settings of the tactical attack panel become very similar in effect. There is no "Focus Play Down The left/Right" or "Overlap Lrft/Right". Any way you set it up is great.The problem, of course, is the weak defence in the middle. I use this pair in the better formation in the online game, which is very pressing in attack, but it does cause problems in defence. In any case, this defensive midfield setup can be applied to many formations and may result in high test scores.
Defensive midfield combination changed to DMS (Get Further Forward) +DMS (Get Further Forward)，It greatly strengthens the connection with the front court, making the overall attack extremely oppressive.The cost is that the defence in the middle becomes very weak, and I think the weaker team should not use this tactic.
Remove "Pass Into Space".
The underlap left&right was increased without any other changes.
Let me try
In fact, under the current engine, personal instructions are not very important, you can set according to your own preferences. When it comes to adding personal instructions, I think there are a few that would be helpful, in order of priority: "Tackle Harder", "Take More Risks", "Dribble More", "Shoot Less Often", these are all you can use, and it is good to add to each position.
Instead of "Pass Into Space", the DMS opted to "Get Further Forward" and was very dominant under the previous engine.
The current engine also performed as well in the holiday test.
It does not seem to make much difference. But today I played an online qualifying match against a super team (I am now a second division coach and just took over recently), and I used this tactic, and the result was a home and away double win, and a statistical advantage, which is the first time since I took over this strong opponent
I have already check it and i think it doesn't change anything in the long run but I'm curious to see the results.
Here are my own:
424 QuadroWave X-4 (Tweak) - https://fm-arena.com/thread/7334-424-quadrowave-x-4-tweak-run-at-defense/
iBox V1.9b - https://fm-arena.com/thread/7237-fm24-ibox-v1-9b-by-dzek/
We have so many test tactics that a lot of times we can't pay too much attention to the changes in some details
I don't know if there has been a recent change in the game engine, but I have experienced in online league games that the "Pass Into Space" command leads to a significant increase in passing errors, and it is necessary to remove this command in order to play more smoothly in a high-intensity pressing style. Take the 4222 formation for example and see how the test went.
You have a try
In any case, this defensive midfield setup can be applied to many formations and may result in high test scores.