Weetabix said: Love this tactics Smile, I know you're working on the Ne Zha tactics and got 63. Well done. For this tactic day day up would having a DM support and an AF work?. I was tempted to try Ne Zha but not sure what players are good for the inverted role Expand
This formation is better suited for a balanced mentality. The dual PF(s) striker combination mostly works well in single-player mode, but I've found it to perform poorly in PVP matches.
Ochre Reindeer said: Can you try to make a 4222? With two amf / and please post the player instructions if you made one Expand
I tried creating a 4-2-2-2 tactic and conducted several holiday tests with both Manchester City and Sheffield United, with decent results. I also used it in two PvP matches where it performed fairly well. However, the current match engine limits the tactical ceiling of this formation, and I expect its ARENA test score would be relatively low. This is because the ARENA test save uses players with specific attributes that may disadvantage certain player roles, and faces AI teams with predetermined tactics, meaning test scores don't fully reflect actual effectiveness in offline saves. Additionally, ARENA's stricter evaluation standards mean tactics scoring above 50 are actually quite viable. You can search the leaderboard for formations matching your preferences - there are many tactics with different styles by various creators available for download and testing.
This formation is better suited for a balanced mentality. The dual PF(s) striker combination mostly works well in single-player mode, but I've found it to perform poorly in PVP matches.
underlap left + overlap right.
underlap left.
AP: DR,SS: DL.
It's all like this.
IF:add "hold position".
IF(a)→IF(s).
I tried creating a 4-2-2-2 tactic and conducted several holiday tests with both Manchester City and Sheffield United, with decent results. I also used it in two PvP matches where it performed fairly well. However, the current match engine limits the tactical ceiling of this formation, and I expect its ARENA test score would be relatively low. This is because the ARENA test save uses players with specific attributes that may disadvantage certain player roles, and faces AI teams with predetermined tactics, meaning test scores don't fully reflect actual effectiveness in offline saves. Additionally, ARENA's stricter evaluation standards mean tactics scoring above 50 are actually quite viable. You can search the leaderboard for formations matching your preferences - there are many tactics with different styles by various creators available for download and testing.