MJK said: Have you tried RPM in the center? I wonder where it falls compared to DM(S) and DM(D) and it's a very different type of player so it would be useful information in practice to know if it's a usable tweak. Expand
I did but i didnt' score any good, or i am hitting all bad rng waves or i have actually no clue
I guess you miss players stats on end of the season, do something like i do if you won't bother to make a specific screen for players stats as well (basically add goals/assist/w/e you believe would be usefull as data)
Changelog: IW and FB combo even on 442, just trying to realize if that's can be an effective combo or not. Even tho, it's really working decent on vacation or will test,later on gonna try WB/IW FB/IF with those pi.
FB/IW are same pi as 424, there is a RPM trying to make impact to the game from long time,tried even regista version that did a bit less then RPM so if that thing doesn't hit 30 i might consider to test even that.
I will put even will's test runs that i am using as indicator for like "normal" games test.
kjarus said: @Delicious Thanks! I already had work in the ball, but will try to lower tempo as well... The midfield on attack seems to work great in testing and counter-plays, but kind of looks a bit anti-football in match engine to be honest. Expand
You need to tune the tactic ingame to make it fit your players as well if you prefer more "control-ball" that's the setup i've tested that is not driving you off from a gegenpress. Let me know how do you feel with minus tempo!
kjarus said: @Delicious what about wing backs that sit wider and IF narrower? Or it's not that good? I would like to have more possession, but not sure which flank combination would be better for that or maybe no PI at all... Expand
Already tried it,it feels like they are same thing, if you want more possession you need to add work ball into box and lower by 1 the tempo, you can get like 5-9% improvement, going up will just lead you off from gegenpress, all those tactics are like that because we play counter-plays but when you face something that is turtling as well is gonna be totaly midfield war.
Adding PI on FB/IW basically i want to see what's the real difference between those roles when we compare to WB and IF, basically are those hidden stats, but what if i am putting the pi that i just want? Since, with FB seem the tactics works better on defensive and IW(on AML/R zone) it's likely missing something compared to IF. Maybe it collapse with Vol while running,not 100% sure yet.
I did but i didnt' score any good, or i am hitting all bad rng waves or i have actually no clue
Changelog :
Since i am losing it, let's test 433 with IW/FB customizated and DM(d).
I guess you miss players stats on end of the season, do something like i do if you won't bother to make a specific screen for players stats as well (basically add goals/assist/w/e you believe would be usefull as data)
Changelog:
IW/WB combo
Changelog:
removed cross less often from IW
Changelog :
IF/WB+DM(su)
Changelog:
IW(customizated)/WB combo
Changelog:
IF instead of IW
Changelog:
Removed Go Further Forward from Volantes, just to be sure that it doesn't impact at all or it does.
West Ham seem really op team btw
Changelog:
RPM become DM(su)
Changelog:
IW and FB combo even on 442, just trying to realize if that's can be an effective combo or not.
Even tho, it's really working decent on vacation or will test,later on gonna try WB/IW FB/IF with those pi.
I don't know why i was sure was like a korean tactician that's why i've asked
Changelog:
Move IW on MCL/R zone.
Changelog:
FB/IW are same pi as 424, there is a RPM trying to make impact to the game from long time,tried even regista version that did a bit less then RPM so if that thing doesn't hit 30 i might consider to test even that.
I will put even will's test runs that i am using as indicator for like "normal" games test.
You need to tune the tactic ingame to make it fit your players as well if you prefer more "control-ball" that's the setup i've tested that is not driving you off from a gegenpress.
Let me know how do you feel with minus tempo!
Already tried it,it feels like they are same thing, if you want more possession you need to add work ball into box and lower by 1 the tempo, you can get like 5-9% improvement, going up will just lead you off from gegenpress, all those tactics are like that because we play counter-plays but when you face something that is turtling as well is gonna be totaly midfield war.
Changelog:
Adding PI on FB/IW basically i want to see what's the real difference between those roles when we compare to WB and IF, basically are those hidden stats, but what if i am putting the pi that i just want? Since, with FB seem the tactics works better on defensive and IW(on AML/R zone) it's likely missing something compared to IF. Maybe it collapse with Vol while running,not 100% sure yet.