I downloaded this tactic from the SIgames forums 6 weeks ago. It is listed as a TFF tweak from his FM20 tactic Cerber V4. The poster was Gojke and when loaded the author was Lakerol.
You didn't read the rules, I have to go for my closest playable club. Canberra should have a side back in the National Comp, but they don't so I have do go with my closest playable club mate.
I like the idea I read about last year, of managing the club nearest to where you live. My sister lives in St Albans (which has an English 6th Tier club - Vanarama South), I live in Canberra Australia closest club Macarthur FC A-League, and my mate was born in Kiel Germany, home club is Holstein Kiel Bundasliga 2. So my save I have 3 managers and play all 3 teams which are so different in standard and location that there is no cross over. Makes it really interesting. Into my second season
Team Report / Analyst Report / Comparison. Then for attributes you can select the ones you are after eg Mental, Physical or Technical - it will then compare your team to the league average
BulldozerJokic said: I still don't understand how neither Balance nor Dribbling ended up in the table, while these are the fifth and fourth most important attributes based on the "important attributes" test from this site. Yeah, there is dribbling for AMCR(L) position, but that position is not presented in the tactic used for the test. Expand
You can read the rationale and the updated calculations at post 31 on page 2. I wasn't looking at this in a tactic specific manner, but across the board for any and all tactics. Read through post 31, I think it will explain what I was trying to achieve.
I was using averages not best or maximum score. There were a couple I picked where the wasn't much difference but some weren't tested substantially. I am now looking at standard deviation against the highest 3 with more than 3 scores.
Player roles and mentality. Although changing roles will also change how players form up and their individual instructions. You will notice that 6 of the top 7 tactics use the same formation. Nothing new in this.
I was hoping to analyze the top 100 tactics and look at averages rather than best, but have only got through the top 50. You will see in the tactics section I have tested a tactic using formation, roles and mentality that I thought came out best. It has tested very well for me. I used formation rather than position as I think this means more. Split formation into 5 rows, DC DLR then WBLR DM then MLR MC then AMLR AMC then ST.
I haven't got to the instructions yet and it might be a bridge too far
Here is my latest tactic - Dragons Breath. Developed after analysis of successful roles in the top 50 tactics on this site - which I will share over the next few days. Thanks to @ZaZ for starting this idea and the set pieces.
I have tested this tactic with reasonable teams in the English Leagues and won them all with good points tallies and goals scored. I would be interested to see how it goes in the test arena.
@Machismo When I looked at Kante's top attributes and then searched with a minor reduction, the best potentially affordable player who also plays in the central midfield or DM is Roberto Gagliardini. See if you can afford him
I think you will need to add screenshots of the tactic and some results with it before they will test it mate
I think you will need to add screenshots of the tactic and some results with it before they will test it mate
You can read the rationale and the updated calculations at post 31 on page 2. I wasn't looking at this in a tactic specific manner, but across the board for any and all tactics. Read through post 31, I think it will explain what I was trying to achieve.
I haven't got to the instructions yet and it might be a bridge too far
Below are the results:
I have tested this tactic with reasonable teams in the English Leagues and won them all with good points tallies and goals scored. I would be interested to see how it goes in the test arena.
C:\FM Genie Scout 21g\Ratings
Then you should be able to select it in Genie Scout under Ratings
Good thinking - link: Ratings Weightings spreadsheet