Gianaa9 said: If in the opponent team there aren't (for example) DL & DR, let's take a 352 shape, they'll mark something else or they won't mark anyone on the pitch? Thank you!! Expand
They won't mark anyone mate, but if they're playing wingbacks then set them to mark the wing backs
Changes- Removed direct passes from FB Added cross from byline to FB Removed sit narrower and roam from position from IF Added mark specific position to IF, Left IF > RB, Right IF > LB
Changes- Removed width from FB and IF Removed roam from position from IF Removed direct passes and take more risks from FB Removed be more disciplined Added mark specific position to IF (RB/LB)
KOLFM said: So that being said, all the tactics listed under 24.2 over the first couple of pages are better than the new ones? because the points totals are higher? i'm confused Expand
The way the tactics are being tested in the DB 3.0 is different than DB 2.0. Arena have made the testing more difficult. There has been no M.E changes in game so the tactics that worked on DB 2.0 will still perform its just the tactics in DB 3.0 have had a more rigorous testing. I can only assume that this tactic would've performed very well in DB 2.0 as the tactics tested in DB 2.0 have had significant point swings in the new DB as documented in the new table, for example the top tactic in DB 2.0 (https://fm-arena.com/thread/10962-424-mi-su7-underlap-pf/) achieved 69 in DB 2.0 but dropped to 59.7 in DB 3.0, so if we take that score as an example, One can only assume that this tactic would've potentially scored higher than 69 in DB 2.0
Thank you
Changes-
Removed cross from byline from FB
Added move into channels to AM
Holiday tested. Best XI selected. AM charge of training. Set pieces left to set piece coach
Changes-
Removed step up more
Dropped defensive line to higher
Left DM changed to Regista
Changes-
AF to CF
DM to RGA
They won't mark anyone mate, but if they're playing wingbacks then set them to mark the wing backs
AF marks RCB
Right IF marks LB
Left IF marks RB
@Fm console tactics pls & @The master
Changes-
Added mark specific postion to AF and PF
Changes-
Added sit narrower to IF
Added Mark specific postion to AM and AF
Removed be more disciplined
Changes-
Removed direct passes from FB
Added cross from byline to FB
Removed sit narrower and roam from position from IF
Added mark specific position to IF, Left IF > RB, Right IF > LB
Holiday tested, Best XI selected
Glad it doing wonders for you pal, hopefully you'll reach the prem
Changes-
Removed narrow width
Changes-
Flipped AF > PF
Flipped IFa > IFs
Removed narrow width
Changes-
FB passing changed to direct
Changes-
Added cut inside and stay wider to FB
Added sit narrower to IF
Removed move into channels from AM
Changes-
Removed width from FB and IF
Removed roam from position from IF
Removed direct passes and take more risks from FB
Removed be more disciplined
Added mark specific position to IF (RB/LB)
The way the tactics are being tested in the DB 3.0 is different than DB 2.0. Arena have made the testing more difficult. There has been no M.E changes in game so the tactics that worked on DB 2.0 will still perform its just the tactics in DB 3.0 have had a more rigorous testing. I can only assume that this tactic would've performed very well in DB 2.0 as the tactics tested in DB 2.0 have had significant point swings in the new DB as documented in the new table, for example the top tactic in DB 2.0 (https://fm-arena.com/thread/10962-424-mi-su7-underlap-pf/) achieved 69 in DB 2.0 but dropped to 59.7 in DB 3.0, so if we take that score as an example, One can only assume that this tactic would've potentially scored higher than 69 in DB 2.0