Zippo said: The purpose of fm-arena tactic testing is not to create competition between tactic creators, the purpose is to help people to find the most effective to play FM and try to reveal how FM work under the hood.
I also want to add that at the moment we find the accuracy of fm-arena tactics is already excessively high and something much more less accurate would work just fine to play FM.
I mean an accuracy of +/- 5 pts or even -/+ 10 pts would be enough already and gave people a massive edge over AI managers in the game. We really don't need an accuracy like +/- 1 or 2 pts or even 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 pts. Expand
I appreciate that and like I said it wasn't meant to come across as being disrespectful
At this moment the highest score is 63.2 pts(the 1st place) so to be tested for more than 4800 matches (up to 9600 matches) a tactic must score higher than 63.2 pts after 4800 matches and keep getting a score above 63.2 after every additional test until it reaches 9600 matches.
I hope it helps.
Cheers. Expand
I don't mean no disrespect to you or the creators of the tactics but I don't see how that is a fair comparison on the tactics around these 2. All other tactics around these have had 9600 matches and has more than likely had a drop in points over them additional 4800 matches but yet are showing further down the table against a tactic that has been tested for half of the games they have.
Have you submitted right screenshots? a mirrored version would see the PF and IFa on the left side but the screenshot is showing both IF's on support and both strikers as AF
Zorojuro said: Idk im not pro or anything but for me, it gets confused when there is no tactical style, its like they do wtv they want or its messy you know? Thats why i always put some tactical style or i feel that there is no meaning in what i do in terms of playstyle.
Thats why i asked what u used in 4-2-3-1
But i get that i shouldn t pay attention to it. Expand
This is a gegenpress tactic, if you put it this way, you could load in a preset park the bus then edit the crap out of it, adding and removing instructions then all of a sudden its no longer a park the bus tactic but a vertical tika taka but your tactical style still says park the bus but its clearly not that tactical style, the tactical style naming doesn't change unless you change it. Like I said I wouldn't focus any attention on that whatsoever
Zorojuro said: So to be clear, its just a custom no tactical style at all? Expand
There will be a tactical style but this is just what Gerrard has named his, a lot of the top tactics are gegenpress, I wouldn't pay any attention to the tactical style
Holiday tested, AM in charge of training. Set pieces left to SP coach
Changes-
Removed roam from position to IF left
Removed hold up ball from IF right
Added roam from position to AF
Holiday tested, AM in charge of training, best XI selected. Set pieces left to SP coach
Changes-
Added roam from position to PF
Changes-
Removed roam from position from PF
Removed hold up ball, roam from position and close down more from IF
Holiday tested, AM in charge in training, best XI selected. Set pieces left to SP coach.
Changes-
Removed hold up ball from IF
Removed roam from position from PF
I also want to add that at the moment we find the accuracy of fm-arena tactics is already excessively high and something much more less accurate would work just fine to play FM.
I mean an accuracy of +/- 5 pts or even -/+ 10 pts would be enough already and gave people a massive edge over AI managers in the game. We really don't need an accuracy like +/- 1 or 2 pts or even 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 pts.
I appreciate that and like I said it wasn't meant to come across as being disrespectful
No, this tactic won't be tested further.
At this moment the highest score is 63.2 pts(the 1st place) so to be tested for more than 4800 matches (up to 9600 matches) a tactic must score higher than 63.2 pts after 4800 matches and keep getting a score above 63.2 after every additional test until it reaches 9600 matches.
I hope it helps.
Cheers.
I don't mean no disrespect to you or the creators of the tactics but I don't see how that is a fair comparison on the tactics around these 2. All other tactics around these have had 9600 matches and has more than likely had a drop in points over them additional 4800 matches but yet are showing further down the table against a tactic that has been tested for half of the games they have.
Thanks
and this https://fm-arena.com/thread/12681-zaz-sapphire-alternative/
and this https://fm-arena.com/thread/12475-424-classic-cbp87-x-ps-v1-5-bw/
Holiday tested, AM in charge of training, Set pieces left to SP coach
Changes -
PF changed to CF
Added close down more to CF
Changes-
Added hold position to DMs
Thats why i asked what u used in 4-2-3-1
But i get that i shouldn t pay attention to it.
This is a gegenpress tactic, if you put it this way, you could load in a preset park the bus then edit the crap out of it, adding and removing instructions then all of a sudden its no longer a park the bus tactic but a vertical tika taka but your tactical style still says park the bus but its clearly not that tactical style, the tactical style naming doesn't change unless you change it. Like I said I wouldn't focus any attention on that whatsoever
There will be a tactical style but this is just what Gerrard has named his, a lot of the top tactics are gegenpress, I wouldn't pay any attention to the tactical style