Zorojuro said: Okay one question, you just use custom tactic without any tactical style? Like imagine, gerard used tiki taka, what u use? Nothing? dunno if im making myself clear tho. Expand
Yeah its clear, I wouldn't take much note of the tactical style on custom tactics. Its sort of a signature for some people. Gerrards tactics are more gegenpress than tiki taka
dzek said: This setup, featuring two PFs on support duty and two IFs on attack duty, seems effective. I've crafted a similar setup before, and it performed well. EF 424 IF P105 AC (Dzek Tweak 1)
Here are some insights from this year's FM with this specific arrangement: - The PFs drop back into the AM positions to play a more active role in the build up of attacks, drawing the opposing team's center-backs out of position. This movement creates opportunities for other players, particularly the IFs, to exploit spaces behind the defense. - The new "Positional Play" feature shows that if the wing players converge towards the centre with or without the ball and the central players shift to AM roles, the wing players become less effective due to the priority they give to central movements. This explains the discrepancy in scores with the previous VOL test and with this test.
Further analysis of this setup could yield interesting results. Expand
Interesting, I wonder how 2 DLFs on support would fare. Good insight there pal
Antal said: Bro, is your tactic effective only in an attacking mood? Will it work in a weak club in an amateur league with a reserved and defensive mood against stronger teams? Expand
I haven't tested it in another mentality, but what I would say is that I've often had success against stronger teams using an attacking mentality. Not saying you're guaranteed to win but worth a try
SK - Tackle Harder FB - Takes more risks, tackle harder, stay wider, cross from byline, cut inside BPD - Dribble more, tackle harder DM - Take more risks, tackle harder IF - Sit narrower, tackle harder, mark specific position **Right IF on LB and Left IF on RB** AM - Take more risks, hold up ball, move into channels, tackle harder AF - Take more risks, tackle harder
Just another 4231, named after the asteroid that apparently is going to smash into Earth.
As always best XI selected, AM in charge of training, Set pieces left to coach.
I have used Akumacy 4 2 3 1 finalshot MK5 as the base tactic, I analysed the style of play for approx 10 competitive matches and saved over the original hence the tactical style name.
Changes- Added narrow width Added invite crosses Added cut inside and cross from byline to FB Added close down more and roam from position to IF Removed dribble more, run wide and shoot less often from FB Removed take more risks from AF
Dinamo said: I would like to ask your opinion on either this tactic or 424 Classic CBP87 x PS v1.5 BW is more suitable for Athletic Bilbao save ? Since there are less options for Basque Striker and AMC, I hardly can decide. Of course will hunt for U16 Spanish players to make them Basque too. Anyway need your short opinion Thanks Expand
What database are you using in terms of player updates?
I would probably go with a 4231 using Nico on the left, Sancet as an AM and Berenguer on the right with Inaki up front. Focus on Acceleration and Pace and make sure you get Nico signing a new contract ASAP get that minimum fee release clause as high as possible
Yeah its clear, I wouldn't take much note of the tactical style on custom tactics. Its sort of a signature for some people. Gerrards tactics are more gegenpress than tiki taka
Here are some insights from this year's FM with this specific arrangement:
- The PFs drop back into the AM positions to play a more active role in the build up of attacks, drawing the opposing team's center-backs out of position. This movement creates opportunities for other players, particularly the IFs, to exploit spaces behind the defense.
- The new "Positional Play" feature shows that if the wing players converge towards the centre with or without the ball and the central players shift to AM roles, the wing players become less effective due to the priority they give to central movements. This explains the discrepancy in scores with the previous VOL test and with this test.
Further analysis of this setup could yield interesting results.
Interesting, I wonder how 2 DLFs on support would fare. Good insight there pal
I haven't tested it in another mentality, but what I would say is that I've often had success against stronger teams using an attacking mentality. Not saying you're guaranteed to win but worth a try
Hey mate,
SK - Tackle Harder
FB - Takes more risks, tackle harder, stay wider, cross from byline, cut inside
BPD - Dribble more, tackle harder
DM - Take more risks, tackle harder
IF - Sit narrower, tackle harder, mark specific position **Right IF on LB and Left IF on RB**
AM - Take more risks, hold up ball, move into channels, tackle harder
AF - Take more risks, tackle harder
Changes-
IF duty changed to Attack
AM in charge of training, best XI selected. Set Piece coach in charge of set pieces
Changes-
Removed underlap
Removed dribble more from FB
https://www.ladbible.com/news/science/god-of-chaos-asteroid-apophis-exact-date-hits-earth-976995-20240906
As always best XI selected, AM in charge of training, Set pieces left to coach.
I have used Akumacy 4 2 3 1 finalshot MK5 as the base tactic, I analysed the style of play for approx 10 competitive matches and saved over the original hence the tactical style name.
Changes-
Right IW moved to IF
Changes-
Dropped IF to IW
Changes-
Added narrow width
Added invite crosses
Added cut inside and cross from byline to FB
Added close down more and roam from position to IF
Removed dribble more, run wide and shoot less often from FB
Removed take more risks from AF
Changes-
Removed distribute quickly
Added roam from position to IF
What database are you using in terms of player updates?
I would probably go with a 4231 using Nico on the left, Sancet as an AM and Berenguer on the right with Inaki up front. Focus on Acceleration and Pace and make sure you get Nico signing a new contract ASAP get that minimum fee release clause as high as possible