Changes- Removed width from FB and IF Removed roam from position from IF Removed direct passes and take more risks from FB Removed be more disciplined Added mark specific position to IF (RB/LB)
KOLFM said: So that being said, all the tactics listed under 24.2 over the first couple of pages are better than the new ones? because the points totals are higher? i'm confused Expand
The way the tactics are being tested in the DB 3.0 is different than DB 2.0. Arena have made the testing more difficult. There has been no M.E changes in game so the tactics that worked on DB 2.0 will still perform its just the tactics in DB 3.0 have had a more rigorous testing. I can only assume that this tactic would've performed very well in DB 2.0 as the tactics tested in DB 2.0 have had significant point swings in the new DB as documented in the new table, for example the top tactic in DB 2.0 (https://fm-arena.com/thread/10962-424-mi-su7-underlap-pf/) achieved 69 in DB 2.0 but dropped to 59.7 in DB 3.0, so if we take that score as an example, One can only assume that this tactic would've potentially scored higher than 69 in DB 2.0
Can you explain what you've changed please? I'm shocked at how the previous top tactics are doing in the new testing DB. What did you change that resulted in such a drastic swing in the previous top tactics?
Changes- Removed be more disciplined Added cut inside with ball to FB Removed direct passes from FB Removed mark specfic position from IF Removed roam from position from IF
If you don't mind me asking @Zippo what is it that you've changed to make the test league more difficult, some of these point swings are enormous. It's like you've created a whole new test league
Our dedicated algorithm determines how many matches to test a tactic and it's constantly adjusting.
It's just the scores that were considered by the algorithm as "relatively high scores" some time ago, now aren't considered as "relatively high scores" due to the increase of the top score.
Holiday tested, Best XI selected
Glad it doing wonders for you pal, hopefully you'll reach the prem
Changes-
Removed narrow width
Changes-
Flipped AF > PF
Flipped IFa > IFs
Removed narrow width
Changes-
FB passing changed to direct
Changes-
Added cut inside and stay wider to FB
Added sit narrower to IF
Removed move into channels from AM
Changes-
Removed width from FB and IF
Removed roam from position from IF
Removed direct passes and take more risks from FB
Removed be more disciplined
Added mark specific position to IF (RB/LB)
The way the tactics are being tested in the DB 3.0 is different than DB 2.0. Arena have made the testing more difficult. There has been no M.E changes in game so the tactics that worked on DB 2.0 will still perform its just the tactics in DB 3.0 have had a more rigorous testing. I can only assume that this tactic would've performed very well in DB 2.0 as the tactics tested in DB 2.0 have had significant point swings in the new DB as documented in the new table, for example the top tactic in DB 2.0 (https://fm-arena.com/thread/10962-424-mi-su7-underlap-pf/) achieved 69 in DB 2.0 but dropped to 59.7 in DB 3.0, so if we take that score as an example, One can only assume that this tactic would've potentially scored higher than 69 in DB 2.0
Changes-
Removed stay wider from FB
Removed sit narrower and roam from position from IF
Removed be more disciplined
Changes-
Removed be more disciplined
Added cut inside with ball to FB
Removed direct passes from FB
Removed mark specfic position from IF
Removed roam from position from IF
Changes-
Added mark specific position to IF
Removed more direct passed from FB
Added cross from byline
Changes-
Removed narrow width
Removed step up more
Changes-
Removed underlap
Removed pass into space
Removed get stuck in
Removed invite crosses
Inspired by the PIs of 424 Mi SU7
Changes-
Removed be more disciplined
Added pass it shorter to LB
Our dedicated algorithm determines how many matches to test a tactic and it's constantly adjusting.
It's just the scores that were considered by the algorithm as "relatively high scores" some time ago, now aren't considered as "relatively high scores" due to the increase of the top score.
I hope that helps.
Cheers.
Cheers mate, appreciate the response