tom100000000000 said: My most recent submission is also double VOL with IWB and I like the way it played but I was quite confused by the IWB positioning. Far fewer runs up the middle than I saw in fm22, which is why I selected overlaps instead of underlaps. Did you notice this too? I wonder if VOL position interferes and they prefer to go wider Expand
You tried underlaps with focus play through middle?
crizeKOS said: I guess style of play in FM is just cosmetic, Im sry saying this. If I want a good gegenpressing tactic I would neither play DLF or PF but AF Expand
Yep sorry thats my point, if you comparing a DLF to a AF in a gegenpress tactic then the AF will be far superior in that role, where as the DLF will probably be better in a possession based tactic
I don't think there is a tier system as such and as obvious as this may sound, I think roles are impacted by the style you play, playing a DLF in a gegenpress isn't going to be as effective as playing a pressing forward.
But it is a good point, I often use the presets to understand which roles suit each style
Zippo said: I've just checked the v3 and v4, I looked only at the TIs and it isn't only overlap and underlap, you also remove 'Pass Into Space' TI, which is capable of making a quite difference.
And the difference between v3 and V4 was only 4 points, which is equal to the the margin of error of a 640 matches test so in theory you can get such difference when you re-test the same tactic but in addition you changed 3 TIs so I don't understand what looks 'crazy' to you. Expand
Apologies @Zippo I forgot that I removed pass into space
Zippo said: Only 2 points isn't a difference at all. It's even less than the margin of error.
If you re-test the same tactic in a normal save ( 38 matches ) then the difference might be as high as 20-25 points ( with the same tactic ).
We test tactics for 2К-3К matches to achieve the margin of error 1-2 points. Expand
Sorry that wasn't a dig at the testing as I appreciate the time and effort you guys put in. I was looking at the results of v3 and v4 with the only difference being overlap and underlap and there is a 65 point swing
Crazy the difference in score between the versions with very minor tweaks each time. I'm not sure if I've bombarded the test already with these 5 variations but I was going to release a v6 later with the set pieces Sandro directed to me. Ill update the original as that gave the strongest result
Something on the lines of 'the set pieces could be improved, check out this link' may have been a little more helpful, my tactics are scoring low? would say 50 is pretty decent
Delicious said: I am pretty sure that underlap for this kind of shape is a must, pass into space is giving you free points,i can't really see what are the rules of the tactic from the screen,but at least since the "counter-press" was removed from "must to have options" things are even smoother. You can try to check the differiecies with or without it. Expand
I would normally agree considering the test results, however just tested overlap with IWB and got my best results thus far
@Zippo Apologies, I have submitted the wrong version of the tactic, any chance you can delete the tactic please and I will upload the correct version, it won't let me change it
Thanks mate, appreciate that and also appreciate that there are some similarities with your XMAS tactics but I can assure you this is just an update of the FM21 tactic
Changes from https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/17275/
- Removed dist to flanks
- Added dist to full backs
- Added tackle harder as a PI to all roles
- Other PIs added to IW/AM/AF
You tried underlaps with focus play through middle?
Yep sorry thats my point, if you comparing a DLF to a AF in a gegenpress tactic then the AF will be far superior in that role, where as the DLF will probably be better in a possession based tactic
But it is a good point, I often use the presets to understand which roles suit each style
And the difference between v3 and V4 was only 4 points, which is equal to the the margin of error of a 640 matches test so in theory you can get such difference when you re-test the same tactic but in addition you changed 3 TIs so I don't understand what looks 'crazy' to you.
Apologies @Zippo I forgot that I removed pass into space
I'm going to shut up now
I suggest watching few matches in 3D to see the difference between IWBs and other FB roles, it's really huge.
I only watch matches in 2d will it still show the movements of the full backs?
If you re-test the same tactic in a normal save ( 38 matches ) then the difference might be as high as 20-25 points ( with the same tactic ).
We test tactics for 2К-3К matches to achieve the margin of error 1-2 points.
Sorry that wasn't a dig at the testing as I appreciate the time and effort you guys put in. I was looking at the results of v3 and v4 with the only difference being overlap and underlap and there is a 65 point swing
Crazy the difference in score between the versions with very minor tweaks each time. I'm not sure if I've bombarded the test already with these 5 variations but I was going to release a v6 later with the set pieces Sandro directed to me. Ill update the original as that gave the strongest result
He is basically saying you're a cabeza de polla
Your tactics use Long Throw-ins but they are terrible in FM23, no one uses them.
Dude, your set pieces are terrible that's your tactics get such low scores
https://fm-arena.com/thread/3100-reliable-set-pieces-fm23/
Wow, thanks dude
Something on the lines of 'the set pieces could be improved, check out this link' may have been a little more helpful, my tactics are scoring low? would say 50 is pretty decent
You can try to check the differiecies with or without it.
I would normally agree considering the test results, however just tested overlap with IWB and got my best results thus far
Changes from https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/17275/
- IW to DW
- WB att to IWB att
- Added overlap left and right
- Removed underlap left and right
The main focus of this change was to see how the IWBs would perform with overlap instead of underlap
Changes from https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/17275/
- Removed pass into space
- Removed overlap left and right
- Added underlap left and right
The main focus of this change was to see how the WBs would perform with underlap instead of overlap
Changes from https://fm-arena.com/thread/3125-return-of-the-mongoose/
- IWB att to WB Att
- DW to IW
- Removed Underlap left and right
- Added overlap left and right
Thanks
Thanks mate, appreciate that and also appreciate that there are some similarities with your XMAS tactics but I can assure you this is just an update of the FM21 tactic
Considering the 41212 seems to be performing very well, I thought it was a good time to bring back the Mongoose. https://fm-arena.com/thread/1532-mongoose-41212-139-goals-scored-salah-scoring-62-won-quadruple/
Tested with City, AM in charge of team selection and training.
I think he means the overall points score was higher than v1 but it achieved less points that v1