Mark said: Only the small changes I mentioned on the test league forum Expand What changes are you talking about? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
Mark said: @dzek tells me that they are the same as the fm arena database Expand Just to clarify something here. My test league uses the same player attributes as it is in FM-Arena tactic test league V1.0. I don't know if there are any changes in V2.0.
Other than that congratulations Mark for the initiative and I imagine that would help a lot of people.
Jdigits said: Any results from your own testing to share?? Always interested in how tactics perform in other tests Expand Hi Jdigits,
The main reason I gave one of my testing leagues is because I am not testing at this time. I have written it in my first post too. Anyone who wants can share their own results
Perijoli said: Big thank you for this!! Im so done with my manual testing.. takes forever.
But if feel a bit stupid, where do i search for the test league in step 5, after pressing binoculars (search filter)? Expand Do what @Chriswin4 says and thank you!
We've put a limit on the number of new tactics a person can share per 24 hours and that number is "2" at the moment.
We're planning to keep the limit until the next patch arrives. Of course, if there are no M.E. changes in the next patch then we keep the limit further until there are significant M.E. changes.
Cheers. Expand You could also disable the ability to upload new tactics while retesting old tactics due to the new version of the testing league.
Have a look and change your link in OP if you think it is worthwhile. I checked the data through Genie Scout and amended through FMRTE.
Hope this helps Expand Hi Mark,
I have looked at the file you sent and noticed the changes you made. I was expecting this comment, its true and so I have to say again that my test league is made up as is FM-Arena's. This means that the positions, attributes, height & width etc of all players are as within the FM-Arena testing league.
The "anomalies" you found also exist in the FM-Arena's testing league and in this part of it, I copied it faithfully. The only difference in mine (in terms of players) is that I added another DC to "The Best AI 4-2-3-1" team so there are at least four. I don't know why in FM-Arena's testing league there are only three in this particular team.
With that said, I would still recommend using v1.
Thanks for your understanding and input on this. I really appreciate it.
Cherknam said: Does anybody know how to get FMRTE to work on Mac? Expand Sorry but I don't use a Mac so I have no knowledge of this. I imagine it will be similar to Windows just with differences in UI.
Mark said: @dzek I have found a few anomalies in the positional setup. I will fix it tonight and send an updated link that you can use to replace the existing one with. Rather than talking you through it and making more work for you I thought I would help out. Please let me know if that is ok. All defenders look fine. Some of the DMs either don't have MC or AMC and have ST instead. Some of the wingers don't have both sides or ST. Some of the ST don't have wingers. Some of the attributes are marginally different. Expand With pleasure!
I will look into it at the first opportunity. Although you don't have to make the changes yourself, all I would ask is that you write down in bullet points the changes you'd like me to look at, although with what you've said so far, I think I've got a rough idea of what you saw and what you've found strange.
I'll wait for you to tell me, I'll look at them and then I'll tell you. Also these are the feedbacks that help me to develop the testing league.
svonn said: Hi, thanks a lot for sharing this dzek! There are a few quirks of the fm-arena test setup that I wanted to analyze, so this save file is extremely valuable to me.
Some stuff I want to test: * Low crosses only meta because all strikers are smaller than defenders? * Can roles like target forwards, false 9, etc. work if you design players that fit that position better? * If so, do roles like wingers profit from this? * Attribute Testing has been done using some meta tactic with lots of vertical passing and dribbling - does the impact of the "creative" passing attributes increase with some tactic that relies on slow build up play? * etc. etc.
I hope to find some time for this, cheers! Expand Hi svonn,
I'm glad this will help you to do your own testings. I would like to stress though that the players have the same attributes etc as they are in FM-Arena’s testing league. This means that the forwards are short and quick and the defenders are taller than them.
But you can try whatever you wish and I would be happy if you share it here with us!
I wish you good tests then and thank you for your kind words!
Chris said: Can we do the same with in-game FM editor? Also, if you freeze atributtes, what's happening with IA teams, do they freeze too? Ty for your time, as always, this tool is great Expand With In-Game Editor you can only freeze player attributes (not conditions, morale etc.) - one by one - and there are 255 players. I wouldn't recommend it. You can use the free version of FMRTE if budget is an issue.
The process I explained in the first post is also for AI players so you have to freeze them too. You're welcome man
The M1rakuru said: all testing teams are same level right? i mean stats ect? Expand Yes, that's correct. All GK have the same attrubutes, all DC have the same attributes etc..
What changes are you talking about? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
TIs added: Work Ball Into Box
TIs added: Play Out Of Defence
Just to clarify something here. My test league uses the same player attributes as it is in FM-Arena tactic test league V1.0. I don't know if there are any changes in V2.0.
Other than that congratulations Mark for the initiative and I imagine that would help a lot of people.
Thank you!
TIs added: Underlap Right
TIs added: Overlap Right
TIs added: Underlap Left
TIs removed: Overlap Left
TIs added: Overlap Left
TIs added: Pass Into Space
TIs removed: Run At Defence
TIs added: Run At Defence, Focus Play Down The Right
TIs removed: Pass Into Space, Overlap Left
SK(a) to SK(d)
DR to FB(a)
Hi Jdigits,
The main reason I gave one of my testing leagues is because I am not testing at this time. I have written it in my first post too. Anyone who wants can share their own results
But if feel a bit stupid, where do i search for the test league in step 5, after pressing binoculars (search filter)?
Do what @Chriswin4 says and thank you!
We've put a limit on the number of new tactics a person can share per 24 hours and that number is "2" at the moment.
We're planning to keep the limit until the next patch arrives. Of course, if there are no M.E. changes in the next patch then we keep the limit further until there are significant M.E. changes.
Cheers.
You could also disable the ability to upload new tactics while retesting old tactics due to the new version of the testing league.
Thank you
Test League V2
Have a look and change your link in OP if you think it is worthwhile. I checked the data through Genie Scout and amended through FMRTE.
Hope this helps
Hi Mark,
I have looked at the file you sent and noticed the changes you made. I was expecting this comment, its true and so I have to say again that my test league is made up as is FM-Arena's. This means that the positions, attributes, height & width etc of all players are as within the FM-Arena testing league.
The "anomalies" you found also exist in the FM-Arena's testing league and in this part of it, I copied it faithfully. The only difference in mine (in terms of players) is that I added another DC to "The Best AI 4-2-3-1" team so there are at least four. I don't know why in FM-Arena's testing league there are only three in this particular team.
With that said, I would still recommend using v1.
Thanks for your understanding and input on this. I really appreciate it.
Cherknam said: Does anybody know how to get FMRTE to work on Mac?
Sorry but I don't use a Mac so I have no knowledge of this. I imagine it will be similar to Windows just with differences in UI.
More informations about this here.
With pleasure!
I will look into it at the first opportunity. Although you don't have to make the changes yourself, all I would ask is that you write down in bullet points the changes you'd like me to look at, although with what you've said so far, I think I've got a rough idea of what you saw and what you've found strange.
I'll wait for you to tell me, I'll look at them and then I'll tell you. Also these are the feedbacks that help me to develop the testing league.
Thank you very much!
Some stuff I want to test:
* Low crosses only meta because all strikers are smaller than defenders?
* Can roles like target forwards, false 9, etc. work if you design players that fit that position better?
* If so, do roles like wingers profit from this?
* Attribute Testing has been done using some meta tactic with lots of vertical passing and dribbling - does the impact of the "creative" passing attributes increase with some tactic that relies on slow build up play?
* etc. etc.
I hope to find some time for this, cheers!
Hi svonn,
I'm glad this will help you to do your own testings. I would like to stress though that the players have the same attributes etc as they are in FM-Arena’s testing league. This means that the forwards are short and quick and the defenders are taller than them.
But you can try whatever you wish and I would be happy if you share it here with us!
I wish you good tests then and thank you for your kind words!
With In-Game Editor you can only freeze player attributes (not conditions, morale etc.) - one by one - and there are 255 players. I wouldn't recommend it. You can use the free version of FMRTE if budget is an issue.
The process I explained in the first post is also for AI players so you have to freeze them too.
You're welcome man
Yes, that's correct. All GK have the same attrubutes, all DC have the same attributes etc..