BLUE FIRE said: there are not many 433 at 3 stars yet the basic training Expand I don't quite understand your question, but if you are asking about good 433 tactics there are some good ones.
sponsorkindest said: Ya true but when they cut specially into the box I didn’t find that big of a difference in game on which one is their strong foot. But these are no biggies. Expand Let's see in future tactics!
sponsorkindest said: That would be awesome! I know if you do a holiday run strong right foot might not be needed for AML (IW) but when you actually play the matches, they play a little different if they don't have a strong right foot, at least that's my observation. So it's so much easier to have a Winger or Inside Forward from a recruitment standpoint. Expand I have noticed that too but IF also use opposite foot so you speak about Wingers.
sponsorkindest said: Damn awesome! If we can make IW to wingers recruitment will be super easy Expand I will upload some different variations but before i have to make some tests on my own. Stay tuned
Delicious said: Mate it's not possible to change so drastically the way of playing on passing and having so similar results. And yet i am sure that devs don't even know what's going on with pass into space+ take more risk+ "play more direct PI".
But really i just look at it on my logic.
If you try to make a possession tactic you will undersand better, even tho i asked them to play shooter, sometimes a guy randomly will launch it, causing me a mental break down for 2 minutes. Expand For sure it will not impact the game so drastically with more direct passing on PIs but it will make the players to pass the ball forward more aggressive without increasing tempo.
Its normal in this FM to watch your defenders make weird things in defence. We have to accept that 😅
Delicious said: Close down less something like that, on iwbs Expand I have ran some tests about pressure attempt and pressure completed per 90 minutes and also I have watched IWBs doing some weird things because of much more often trigger press. So with "Close Down Less" they stick to their position more and defend more effective(at least on my tests).
Delicious said: I did tried it in the past always did worst idk. Maybe i am not really lucky. Expand I used to use them before and I thought they were very good but because I was more concerned with the tactical style I didn't pay attention to them.
Delicious said: And i still don't know if that take on "ease" is working or not o.o Expand About tackling?
Delicious said: So happy about that, so means i am not totally crazy to play it on the pep recreation )) Expand I think is the best role for wider areas in this FM edition
Delicious said: @dzek what pi did you put on FB? I was going there next ) Expand The same as we put on IWB but without "Roam From Position" and "Cut Inside With Ball"
Delicious said: One thing i did learn in my life is when someone say on "IT field" : "could" means that he doesn't know for sure I mean it clear that not even them knows what's going on anymore at this point.
Why the hell they removed the option 1-20 from those stuff only gods knows. Expand
Only "Defend" duties and combinations of Role + Duty that aren't eligible for "Dribble More" PI aren't affected by "Run At Defense" in all other cases "Run At Defense" adds "Dribble More" PI. Expand This sounds more logical. I speak with Jack about differences between “Run At Defence” and “Dribble More” and which positions get affected and this is his reply.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- IWB(At) --> IWB(Su)
- AM(Su) --> AM(At)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- IWB(Su) --> IWB(At)
- WM(At) --> WM(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Trying some new combinations of PIs and roles.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- SK(At) --> G(De)
- BPD(St & Co) --> CD(St)
- WM(Su) --> WM(At)
- AM(At) --> AM(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
I don't quite understand your question, but if you are asking about good 433 tactics there are some good ones.
Check these:
433 Paradox Engine X by @Delicious
433 interim by @opq
Tactical style by @Delicious.
Changes
Roles and Duties
- SK(De) --> GK(De)
- FB(Su) --> IWB(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Let's see in future tactics!
I have noticed that too but IF also use opposite foot so you speak about Wingers.
I will upload some different variations but before i have to make some tests on my own. Stay tuned
Well, you take it to the other extreme
Let's see another 7 runs
Not even know why you guys watch in 2D
You can only watch the GIF with full backs do crazy things. Old school FM gamers is one way to 2D
But really i just look at it on my logic.
If you try to make a possession tactic you will undersand better, even tho i asked them to play shooter, sometimes a guy randomly will launch it, causing me a mental break down for 2 minutes.
For sure it will not impact the game so drastically with more direct passing on PIs but it will make the players to pass the ball forward more aggressive without increasing tempo.
Its normal in this FM to watch your defenders make weird things in defence. We have to accept that 😅
I have many examples
You can see here a little one.
I have ran some tests about pressure attempt and pressure completed per 90 minutes and also I have watched IWBs doing some weird things because of much more often trigger press. So with "Close Down Less" they stick to their position more and defend more effective(at least on my tests).
Btw its the same thing like passing directness
I used to use them before and I thought they were very good but because I was more concerned with the tactical style I didn't pay attention to them.
Delicious said: And i still don't know if that take on "ease" is working or not o.o
About tackling?
I think is the best role for wider areas in this FM edition
The same as we put on IWB but without "Roam From Position" and "Cut Inside With Ball"
Tactical style by @Delicious.
Changes
Roles and Duties
- IWB(Su) --> FB(Su)
- WM(Su) --> IW(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
I mean it clear that not even them knows what's going on anymore at this point.
Why the hell they removed the option 1-20 from those stuff only gods knows.
I totally agree with you 😂
Only "Defend" duties and combinations of Role + Duty that aren't eligible for "Dribble More" PI aren't affected by "Run At Defense" in all other cases "Run At Defense" adds "Dribble More" PI.
This sounds more logical. I speak with Jack about differences between “Run At Defence” and “Dribble More” and which positions get affected and this is his reply.