dzek
@letsgo9 I was about to ask about IWB but then I read what you wrote above :D
Grimlock said: HOLY COW!

57 pts for 4-3-3!!!

:woot:

@Zippo, I have noticed that you remove 442 formation for AI Managers and you insert another 443. Did you find that in this ME 442 is not powerful?

And “Team C” text on testing league table is not highlighted with blue color. Its still under control of you or you increase AI teams?
Next move is to create a tactic with all out attack for duties!! :D
Maybe we reach 60 points.
@letsgo9 did you test it with Attacking mentality?
424 Jade Dynasty II (Dzek Tweak) - Attacking
A tweak of this tactic, created by @A Smile.

Changes:
Roles and Duties
  - IF(Su)  -->  W(Su)
  - IW(Su)  -->  W(Su)
  - WB(Su)  -->  WB(At)

Player Instructions
  - Added 'Cut Inside With Ball' to AMR/L positions.

424 Jade Dynasty II (Dzek Tweak) - Positive
A different variation of this tactic.
Created by @A Smile.

Changes:
Mentality
  - Attacking  -->  Positive

424 Jade Dynasty II (Dzek Tweak) - Balanced
A different variation of this tactic.
Created by @A Smile.

Changes:
Mentality
  - Attacking  -->  Balanced

424 is still OP for FM24.

This means that there are not many differences in this year's ME except for positional play ( which only some roles have this effect by default ) and some minor role changes like removed some hardcoded PIs.
hziz1 said: thank you so much!now i just wait for the test result lol
Look, now you have a very good chance for your tactic to be tested. Its up to FM-Arena's team :)
hziz1 said: Hi, @dzek  how bout these screenshots, thanks
I think now its okay, just change your old screenshots on your OP to the new ones.
Hi @hziz1,

Please read this and try again - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thank you!
Steelwood said: Yes but even them I'm sure it's the width doing it. @Blau uploaded a version of this a few days ago that did incredibly well with DWs. I've been testing the same shape since with IWs and it has been nowhere near as good
Last year there was an “issue” with wingers in general (W, DW, IW) that in order to have a winger cutting inside you had to have the role of an inverted winger in your tactics. But there was a slight difference in how each winger role behaved and that was the width they provided in the final third.

The wingers/defensive wingers kept the width in all phases of the game while the inverted wingers, when the build from defence to attack was over, they cut inside WITHOUT the ball. The same is true in this year's version for the inverted wingers. The difference with the wingers/defensive wingers this year is that they can cut inside WITH the ball at their feet but still maintain their width in attack WITHOUT the ball.

Also the reason why the cut inside roles worked better last year and this year is because of the latest updates they made to FM23 ( ME 23.2 ) that encouraged more central attacking play.

This is my opinion :)
Steelwood said: I have a hunch that width is very important on this game, a bit like it was in FM22. Last year we could play IWB with IW no problem but I'm not sure that's the case now
Or WBs on Attack duty are OP on FM24 Beta ;)
Because if you didn't notice wing backs, complete wing backs, wingers and defensive wingers don’t have Run Wide With Ball PI enabled by default this year.
@AlexJV please share your league table too. Thank you!
@Zippo can we have a finished game save of the testing league?
FMRTE is out so it’s matter of time to have the very first test result!

Here we go again! ;)
FM24 Beta is out!