BLUE FIRE said: have you tried another variant of the tactic with a different formation example442 un 41212 Expand This is a 442 tactic with DMs instead of MCs for better defensive protection. 41212 you mean 442 diamond wide?
Delicious said: Yes, but why then if we put take more risk or not the results are almost the same? Same points/GD w/e. IT should change something no? I can tell you at least from my point of view in-game that i can't really see any difference.. but i am might be totally blind at this point Expand Maybe you could be right.
Match engine is more complex than we think so an instruction itself might not produce any improvement but a combination of some instructions might do wonders/differences. I'm running some tests now to check the differences not only on points but in general (pass completion, possession lost etc.)
Delicious said: Explain to this guy that de Zerbi works on : Open space triangles, and drop position.. Isn't something it can explain by a FM's Feature )). Expand Indeed but in his reply, he explains a little bit more of how some TIs/PIs works.
A little more content on "Run At Defence/Dribble More" and "Pass Into Space/Take More Risks" from SI's developer, Marc Vaughan.
..that's why we see BPD and IWB move forward with the ball when PI "Dribble More" enabled instead of only "Run At Defence" enabled. This makes some logic.
BLUE FIRE said: there are not many 433 at 3 stars yet the basic training Expand I don't quite understand your question, but if you are asking about good 433 tactics there are some good ones.
sponsorkindest said: Ya true but when they cut specially into the box I didn’t find that big of a difference in game on which one is their strong foot. But these are no biggies. Expand Let's see in future tactics!
sponsorkindest said: That would be awesome! I know if you do a holiday run strong right foot might not be needed for AML (IW) but when you actually play the matches, they play a little different if they don't have a strong right foot, at least that's my observation. So it's so much easier to have a Winger or Inside Forward from a recruitment standpoint. Expand I have noticed that too but IF also use opposite foot so you speak about Wingers.
sponsorkindest said: Damn awesome! If we can make IW to wingers recruitment will be super easy Expand I will upload some different variations but before i have to make some tests on my own. Stay tuned
An updated version of this tactic.
Changes:
Team Instructions
- Added: Slow Pace Down
"GOALKEEPER IN POSSESSION" has an influence on the overall tempo of the team and I wanted to try it out.
This is a 442 tactic with DMs instead of MCs for better defensive protection. 41212 you mean 442 diamond wide?
Changes
Roles and Duties
- IWB(Su) & CWB(Su) --> FB(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Tactical style by @Delicious.
Changes
Roles and Duties
- G(De) --> SK(At)
Tweaks on all PIs & set pieces.
Maybe you could be right.
Match engine is more complex than we think so an instruction itself might not produce any improvement but a combination of some instructions might do wonders/differences. I'm running some tests now to check the differences not only on points but in general (pass completion, possession lost etc.)
Indeed but in his reply, he explains a little bit more of how some TIs/PIs works.
A little more content on "Run At Defence/Dribble More" and "Pass Into Space/Take More Risks" from SI's developer, Marc Vaughan.
..that's why we see BPD and IWB move forward with the ball when PI "Dribble More" enabled instead of only "Run At Defence" enabled. This makes some logic.
Changes
Roles and Duties
RB - FB(Su) --> IWB(Su)
LB - FB(Su) --> CWB(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Changes
Roles and Duties
- IWB(Su) --> FB(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- IWB(At) --> IWB(Su)
- WM(Su) --> WM(At)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- IWB(Su) --> IWB(At)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- IWB(At) --> IWB(Su)
- AM(Su) --> AM(At)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- IWB(Su) --> IWB(At)
- WM(At) --> WM(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Trying some new combinations of PIs and roles.
Changes:
Roles and Duties:
- SK(At) --> G(De)
- BPD(St & Co) --> CD(St)
- WM(Su) --> WM(At)
- AM(At) --> AM(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
I don't quite understand your question, but if you are asking about good 433 tactics there are some good ones.
Check these:
433 Paradox Engine X by @Delicious
433 interim by @opq
Tactical style by @Delicious.
Changes
Roles and Duties
- SK(De) --> GK(De)
- FB(Su) --> IWB(Su)
Tweaks on all PIs.
Let's see in future tactics!
I have noticed that too but IF also use opposite foot so you speak about Wingers.
I will upload some different variations but before i have to make some tests on my own. Stay tuned