@DarthTrone, FMRTE's CA and RCA weightings are incorrect and can't be trusted.
For "experiment" I suggest using the official in-game editor.
For example, let's take Saliba. As you can see his RCA is 164
Now, let's increase his STC playing position to "20"
As you can see his RCA has increased from 164 to 172 and that means if his CA stays the same(164) without increasing after some time then his attributes will "drop" because now their CA price have increased.
Every additional playing position increases the CA cost of the attributes.
It isn't possible to retrain a central defender into a "pure striker" because to create "a pure striker" it requires somehow to make him "unlearn" his default Central Defender position and I'd say that isn't possible to do.
Speaking other words, if you start training a central defender to play a striker then eventually he'll become ST/CD and not a pure ST.
akumacy said: Hello Guys, I just formatted my pc and wanted to download fmrte again but it looks like website is down. Is it same for everyone or just for me?
Thanks! Expand
The FMRTE site doesn't open for me too. Probably, they're producing a maintenance or experiencing technical issues at the moment.
MrSphinx said: A screenshot of these, for example. I am unclear which training to do on which day Expand
When I play FM24 I always use the default(Balanced) training from the game and I can tell you that with any team I do great.
Using the training from this thread requires solid understanding what are you doing and if you even struggle to incorporate it then I suggest you just use the Balanced default training from the game.
MrSphinx said: I am new to FM - can someone please post a screenshot of some of the best training schedules? I am having a tough time reading the Excel files and incorporating them into training schedule Expand
Hi, if you aren't sure what training to use then just use the default "Balanced" training, you can't go wrong with it.
fm24noob said: hello sir, i am the manager of huddersfield in my save (efl league 1) haven’t made too many changes. i find that i often lose 3-1, 2-0, 4-3, 3-0, etc any reason? i’m fairly new to the game so sorry if there’s something obvious im missing. thanks 🙏 Expand
geewcee said: Who actually tests the tactics for 9000+ seasons? Have you got a dedicated team of testers? Sorry I am new here so just intrigued. Expand
It's 9,600 matches.
9,600 matches / 38matches(1 season) = 252 seasons
The testing is automated and done by fm-arena testing server.
gallina said: Separately, can 'OK' tactics be workable in-game? Expand
Yes, it'll work just fine.
gallina said: As for positions, every 4ATB formation has BPDs flanked by FB(a)s. 3ATB formations have BPDs with maybe a Libero in the middle flanked by WB(a)s. Defensive Midfielders are DM(s) unless you don't have any AMCs, in which case they are VOL(a). CMs are CM(s), occasionally CM(a). 10s are AM. Wingers are always IF. Sole strikers are AF(a). 2 or 3 strikers are PF(s) or AF(a). Expand
sa said: They are set to change tactic. My game emails say "Whites park the bus approach" meaning it does indeed play the park the bus formation and change to gegenpressing at different game states. Are you sure you're doing everything right? I've tried a 550 blended with other tactics like 10 up front and noticed a clear difference. Expand
Do you know that you can watch re-play of any match in 3D after it was played?
Pick any match where you sure that different tactics were used in possession and out of possession and check it yourself.
Above link is to the save file. Started preseason using this method: anyone can view the match history and watch the formations ingame. Expand
Pal, I've checked the save you upload and I can't confirm that anything you're saying is true.
First of all, I checked the match plans and found they wasn't set to change the tactic.
Probably, you was just deceived because you tested using it two very similar shapes 4-2-4 and 4-4-2. As I said try something more obviously different, for example, 4-2-4 formation as you attacking tactic and 5-4-1 formation as your defensive formation.
For "experiment" I suggest using the official in-game editor.
For example, let's take Saliba. As you can see his RCA is 164
Now, let's increase his STC playing position to "20"
As you can see his RCA has increased from 164 to 172 and that means if his CA stays the same(164) without increasing after some time then his attributes will "drop" because now their CA price have increased.
Every additional playing position increases the CA cost of the attributes.
It isn't possible to retrain a central defender into a "pure striker" because to create "a pure striker" it requires somehow to make him "unlearn" his default Central Defender position and I'd say that isn't possible to do.
Speaking other words, if you start training a central defender to play a striker then eventually he'll become ST/CD and not a pure ST.
https://fm-arena.com/thread/14027-does-the-preferred-foot-matter-for-inside-forwards/
Yes, it works the same with Instant Result or as watching matches.
I just formatted my pc and wanted to download fmrte again but it looks like website is down. Is it same for everyone or just for me?
Thanks!
The FMRTE site doesn't open for me too. Probably, they're producing a maintenance or experiencing technical issues at the moment.
Reflexes for GK = roughly -10 GoalDiff for 1 player, for 38 matches
Pace = roughly -5.9 Goal Diff, for 1 player for 38 matches
Is that correct/valid conclusion?
That seems correct to me.
When I play FM24 I always use the default(Balanced) training from the game and I can tell you that with any team I do great.
Using the training from this thread requires solid understanding what are you doing and if you even struggle to incorporate it then I suggest you just use the Balanced default training from the game.
Hi, if you aren't sure what training to use then just use the default "Balanced" training, you can't go wrong with it.
https://fm-arena.com/thread/14022-benefits-of-taking-control-over-the-set-pieces/
https://fm-arena.com/thread/13525-11-7-set-piece-best-hits-update-from-han106/
https://fm-arena.com/thread/8935-set-piece-testing/
Look at this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/1076-my-tactic-doesn-t-work-help-me-please/
and this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/14009-attribute-testing-football-manager-24/
Try these - https://fm-arena.com/thread/14059-ratings-file-for-genie-scout-based-on-fm-arena-attribute-testing/
It's 9,600 matches.
9,600 matches / 38matches(1 season) = 252 seasons
The testing is automated and done by fm-arena testing server.
Long Shots attribute takes CA, it isn't free.
I've just noticed the way the testing results are represented was changed.
https://fm-arena.com/table/fm24-hall-of-fame/
Ouch... the top tactics are only capable of winning 55% of the possible points! We need a tactic that can reach 100% of winning!
I really like the new way.
Good job.
Yes, it'll work just fine.
gallina said: As for positions, every 4ATB formation has BPDs flanked by FB(a)s. 3ATB formations have BPDs with maybe a Libero in the middle flanked by WB(a)s. Defensive Midfielders are DM(s) unless you don't have any AMCs, in which case they are VOL(a). CMs are CM(s), occasionally CM(a). 10s are AM. Wingers are always IF. Sole strikers are AF(a). 2 or 3 strikers are PF(s) or AF(a).
https://fm-arena.com/thread/13324-gasp4-v4-revengemode/
The tactic above uses "Winger", "Segundo Volante", "Inverted Wing Back", "Inside Forward", "Defensive Midfield", "Full Back", "Advanced Forward" and "Pressing Forward".
it has 8 different roles and it works great.
Do you know that you can watch re-play of any match in 3D after it was played?
Pick any match where you sure that different tactics were used in possession and out of possession and check it yourself.
Above link is to the save file. Started preseason using this method: anyone can view the match history and watch the formations ingame.
Pal, I've checked the save you upload and I can't confirm that anything you're saying is true.
First of all, I checked the match plans and found they wasn't set to change the tactic.
Probably, you was just deceived because you tested using it two very similar shapes 4-2-4 and 4-4-2. As I said try something more obviously different, for example, 4-2-4 formation as you attacking tactic and 5-4-1 formation as your defensive formation.
If what you're saying is true then the difference between 4-2-3-1 and 5-3-2 should be easily visible.
sa said: Hey Lapidus, it's alright if I send you my save file and you can experiment with that?
You can upload your game save anywhere and put a download link to it here for everyone to check, not only me.
I'm really looking into it.