Mentality to attacking Left IF to AM attack Increased tempo to higher Added underlap right (right dm to exploit space) Added overlap left (wing back to exploit space left by AM)
Changes - IFa to IFs Right CM now has hold position DM now has hold position Left CM now has attack duty Removed focus play down flanks Added overlap
Idea is to have the left CM push into a more attacking midfield role and for the right CM to hold position so essentially creating a 4231 with somewhat a double pivot which seems to be crucial in this years top formations
As I said, no offense. I just wanted to understand the logic behind that way of naming tactics.
Peace. Expand
Sorry, just read my replies back and I'm coming aross as a bit shitty. Wasn't my intention. I get what you're saying though and appreciate it can be confusing. It just helps me identify my tactics a little better and previously the v1 or v2 made identifying how the tactic performed a little tricky as I would have to go and do some digging where as putting the points tally in the name gives me a better indicition at a glance
Nikko said: But what if two of your tactics/versions hit the same points in your tests? in this can you need to find some workout around.
Why not putting any information that helps identify the tactic in the description and keep the tactic name as clean as possible?
My mind is blowing when I see people come with name likes:
"433mybestevertactic 100pts LW IF KKTW ATTACK MANY GOALS"
For God sake... that's madness Expand
Like I said that's your opinion.
I do add a version number if the same points total is achieved. I'm not going to change how I name my tactics, you're the only person that seems to have an issue with it.
I've been posting tactics using this naming method for years and you're the first person to moan about it.
Nikko said: "the versions names" consist less character and it's easy to memorize them and refer to. Also, they makes sense, by looking at the version numbers you can conclude which tactics were released earlier/later.
"the points names" complete makes no sense and I always wonder what's the point in putting them in tactic names. Expand
Ok well that's your opinion mate, but I prefer to put the points in the name as it helps me identify the tactic, I think it provides a more unique identifier than v1 or v2
nEGRoSCN said: Didnt understand you but thank you anyway <3 i enjoyed with this tac
And yes im noob about tac changes etc. just download and play Expand
Stick the role on support and add the player instructions what are on the attacking role on the support role, you would probably need to only add get further forward, the player instructions the creator added should stay even when changing the role duty
Changes -
Mentality to attacking
Left IF to AM attack
Increased tempo to higher
Added underlap right (right dm to exploit space)
Added overlap left (wing back to exploit space left by AM)
Haaland 103 goals!!!
Changes -
CMs to CMd
Removed hold position from DM
Increased tempo to higher
Added overlap
Changes -
IFa to IFs
Right CM now has hold position
DM now has hold position
Left CM now has attack duty
Removed focus play down flanks
Added overlap
Idea is to have the left CM push into a more attacking midfield role and for the right CM to hold position so essentially creating a 4231 with somewhat a double pivot which seems to be crucial in this years top formations
Changes -
Mentality to balanced
DMs to DMd
As I said, no offense. I just wanted to understand the logic behind that way of naming tactics.
Peace.
Sorry, just read my replies back and I'm coming aross as a bit shitty. Wasn't my intention. I get what you're saying though and appreciate it can be confusing. It just helps me identify my tactics a little better and previously the v1 or v2 made identifying how the tactic performed a little tricky as I would have to go and do some digging where as putting the points tally in the name gives me a better indicition at a glance
Why not putting any information that helps identify the tactic in the description and keep the tactic name as clean as possible?
My mind is blowing when I see people come with name likes:
"433mybestevertactic 100pts LW IF KKTW ATTACK MANY GOALS"
For God sake... that's madness
Like I said that's your opinion.
I do add a version number if the same points total is achieved. I'm not going to change how I name my tactics, you're the only person that seems to have an issue with it.
I've been posting tactics using this naming method for years and you're the first person to moan about it.
"the points names" complete makes no sense and I always wonder what's the point in putting them in tactic names.
Ok well that's your opinion mate, but I prefer to put the points in the name as it helps me identify the tactic, I think it provides a more unique identifier than v1 or v2
The "points" thing looks unlogical, ambiguous and unnecessary.
The "versions" thing look clean and nice.
I just really don't get.
what's the difference?
Changes -
Higher tempo changed to Standard tempo
As always, Holiday tested, AM in charge of training, I put locked Haaland into the AF position and he bagged 90 in all comps
We need to get a 451 into the 60s!!
Changes -
Mentality dropped to balanced
Removed distribute quickly
Just wanted to wish you, your families and the team a very merry Christmas and a happy new year.
Thank you for all the hard work you've put in this year delivering outstanding testing
All the best
Chris
Changes -
Removed fairly wide
Removed prevent GK short distribution
Removed get stuck in
Removed step up more
Barely any transfers made, just Ilic and Suarez for the first team -
Updated screenshots after last game of season
No editor used
https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-fm-arena-picks-tactics-for-the-testing/
https://imgur.com/a/fLebpnB
Yeah looks good mate
And yes im noob about tac changes etc. just download and play
Stick the role on support and add the player instructions what are on the attacking role on the support role, you would probably need to only add get further forward, the player instructions the creator added should stay even when changing the role duty
Just stick the attacking PIs on the support role, should play somewhat similar