ZaZ said: By the way, from these two seasons with Concord Rangers I figured some tips to improve the tactic. Basically, I noticed there are too many people by the edge of opponent's area, by the middle. Everyone goes up, including RPM, IWBs and even BPDs. \ Expand
Have you thought that it might be the reason why the tactic works so good?
And if you change it then the tactic might lose its edge.
Kyle said: Holidays test just seem unreliable in general, very dependent on how well other teams are doing, injuries to both player and AI and obviously sometimes you just get really lucky and is much easier to fluke 38 games than 456 or whatever the tests are. Expand
Metal said: I've made many changes to the attack so both attacking midfielders are exploiting the space to get on to driect through balls driven by the midfielder and wingers who now create centrally. In my view AM is more overpowered than the second striker in my opinion Expand
kyle4921 said: Does this tactic work in lower league still? I'm playing as Slough and promoted from the South league and National league in my first seasons using a different tactic and lost play offs in my first season in League Two. I've switched to this tactic in the pre season and I'm really struggling. I'm only 3 points outside of the relegation zone after 14 games. Is there something I'm doing wrong or does the tactic not work with bad teams anymore? My striker that was top goal scorer in the league last season has scored only 4 goals in 14 games. If you could offer any advice that would be appreciated. Expand
ta2199 said: As @ZaZ suggested, I would love to see how assymetric Blue would do with an playmaker help connect CM and SS together. And as you can see both CM and SS score a lots. Test Result:
Changes: 1 SS(A) → AP(A) (with PIs added) Formation change to assysmetric Expand
SS(A) -> AP(A) has been tested like a million times in many different tactics and it never made any significant difference, it was like 0.1% difference and most of time it was a negative difference.
Check other tested tactics and you see that many people have tried already AP instead of SS/AM in their tactics and it never did any good.
Also, people have tried already many other changes like:
CM(A) -> BBM/DM/BWM
IWB -> WB/FB/CWB
DW -> W
BPD -> CD
W(S) -> W(A)
and so on...
I suggest to learn from other people experience because a lot things have been tested very well in FM21.
goatmas said: Are you guys learning players traits? For example run into space on shadow strikers, get forward on central midfielder. And have you found any success/must have traits? Expand
Here's what @ZaZ said about traits in other thread
ZaZ said: In short, you only want traits that enforce what the tactic asks the player to do. Anything else has potential to disrupt the flow of the tactics.
For example, if a position has the instruction "hold back", then add "stay back at all times", but never "get further forward", since that would be opposite of what the tactic asks him to do. Expand
it's present, you missed it.
I can't see it too. Probably, @ZaZ removed it for some reason.
Have you thought that it might be the reason why the tactic works so good?
And if you change it then the tactic might lose its edge.
I want to get into the top 4 without signing in the first transfer window
what formation do you prefer to use with the team?
Ok, now it's a proper way to share your tactic when it's based on someone else's work.
P.S. adding a link to ZaZ's Orange tactic would be nice too.
Then I'd say it's a great result
What is Leicester's media prediction ?
It'll be tested at some point. There are a lot of other tactics await to be tested.
If you want to bring more attention to this tactic then you'd better post some results with it instead just asking for a test.
OK, we forgive you!
Here's how a proper testing should be done - https://fm-arena.com/thread/652-fm-arena-tactic-testing-league/
It doesn't make sense sharing a FM22 tactic in FM21 sharing tactic section
Hi,
Could you write down all the changes you made?
Hi,
Look at these threads:
https://fm-arena.com/thread/1076-my-tactic-doesn-t-work-help-me-please/
https://fm-arena.com/thread/1074-mythbusters-the-ai-learns-your-tactic-tactics-only-work-for-one-season/
Hi,
Look at these:
https://fm-arena.com/thread/1076-my-tactic-doesn-t-work-help-me-please/
https://fm-arena.com/thread/1074-mythbusters-the-ai-learns-your-tactic-tactics-only-work-for-one-season/
Test Result:
Changes:
1 SS(A) → AP(A) (with PIs added)
Formation change to assysmetric
SS(A) -> AP(A) has been tested like a million times in many different tactics and it never made any significant difference, it was like 0.1% difference and most of time it was a negative difference.
Check other tested tactics and you see that many people have tried already AP instead of SS/AM in their tactics and it never did any good.
Also, people have tried already many other changes like:
CM(A) -> BBM/DM/BWM
IWB -> WB/FB/CWB
DW -> W
BPD -> CD
W(S) -> W(A)
and so on...
I suggest to learn from other people experience because a lot things have been tested very well in FM21.
Yup, that's correct.
Here's what @ZaZ said about traits in other thread
ZaZ said: In short, you only want traits that enforce what the tactic asks the player to do. Anything else has potential to disrupt the flow of the tactics.
For example, if a position has the instruction "hold back", then add "stay back at all times", but never "get further forward", since that would be opposite of what the tactic asks him to do.